Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
Active

Block Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity

How much larger can block sensitivity be than sensitivity for a total Boolean function?

For a total Boolean function f:{0,1}n→{0,1}f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}f:{0,1}n→{0,1}, a block of coordinates is sensitive at xxx if flipping every bit in that block changes f(x)f(x)f(x). Let s(f,x)s(f,x)s(f,x) count sensitive singletons and bs(f,x)bs(f,x)bs(f,x) be the maximum number of pairwise disjoint sensitive blocks. Define s(f)=max⁡xs(f,x)s(f)=\max_x s(f,x)s(f)=maxx​s(f,x) and bs(f)=max⁡xbs(f,x)bs(f)=\max_x bs(f,x)bs(f)=maxx​bs(f,x).

This campaign seeks larger exponents α\alphaα for which there exists an infinite family of total Boolean functions fk:{0,1}nk→{0,1}f_k:\{0,1\}^{n_k}\to\{0,1\}fk​:{0,1}nk​→{0,1}, indexed by k=1,2,…k=1,2,\ldotsk=1,2,…, satisfying

s(fk)→∞,bs(fk)≥s(fk)α−o(1)as k→∞.s(f_k)\to\infty,\qquad bs(f_k)\ge s(f_k)^{\alpha-o(1)}\quad\text{as }k\to\infty.s(fk​)→∞,bs(fk​)≥s(fk​)α−o(1)as k→∞.

Here o(1)o(1)o(1) denotes a quantity tending to zero as k→∞k\to\inftyk→∞. Higher is better. The classical exponent is 222, and Huang's bound gives a ceiling of 444.

OpenAI's construction achieves an exponent strictly greater than 222.

One sufficient way to establish an exponent α\alphaα is to find a single total Boolean function fff with s(f)>1s(f)>1s(f)>1 and bs(f)≥s(f)αbs(f)\ge s(f)^\alphabs(f)≥s(f)α. Input and output normalization followed by self-composition then yields the required asymptotic family.

Submit an entryLog in to start a draft.

Progress

9 missions
Best formalized bound≥ 2.05

Block Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Reach 2.05Solved Oct 16, 2026

Formalized missions form a staircase from the weakest to the best value, one slot per mission at uniform spacing. A date in parentheses is later than the date of a better result. Open missions follow the history as unconnected circles labeled Today, ordered from less to more ambitious values. Select a point to highlight its mission on this page. Press plus or minus to zoom the timeline, zero to show the full history, and the arrow keys to move along it while zoomed.Lower bound2.002.052.10(Oct 16)Oct 15(Oct 15)Oct 15Oct 16Oct 16Oct 16TodayTodayBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Classical Quadratic Bound, ≥ 2, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: OpenAI Baseline, ≥ 2.000252407, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Depth-20 Improvement, ≥ 2.006470828, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Reach 2.007, ≥ 2.007, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Reach 2.0205, ≥ 2.0205, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: α ≥ 2.0391, ≥ 2.0391, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Reach 2.05, ≥ 2.05, formalizedBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Reach 2.0635, ≥ 2.0635, open missionBlock Sensitivity vs. Sensitivity: Reach 2.10, ≥ 2.1, open mission
Formalized resultsOpen missions(Date) Formalized after a better resultCtrl + scroll to zoomPinch to zoom
Select a point to explore a mission

Missions

Completed7

Open2

Top contributors

RankContributorAccepted solutionsSubmitted problems
1SCShuze Chen3196
2MAmarwahaha2336
3LSLeo Shaposhnik812
4ABabhishekdpseok21
5BW@bwdaugherty11
5RKRobin Kothari11
7WUwurtle010

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me