A host algebra of a topological group G is a C^-algebra whose representations are in one-to-one correspondence with certain continuous unitary representations of G. In this paper we present an approach to host algebras for infinite dimensional Lie groups which is based on complex involutive semigroups. Any locally bounded absolute value αon such a semigroup S leads in a natural way to a C^-algebra C^(S,α), and we describe a setting which permits us to conclude that this C^-algebra is a host algebra for a Lie group G. We further explain how to attach to any such host algebra an invariant weak-*-closed convex set in the dual of the Lie algebra of G enjoying certain nice convex geometric properties. If G is the additive group of a locally convex space, we describe all host algebras arising this way. The general non-commutative case is left for the future.
This mission is the statement-level formalization of A complex semigroup approach to group algebras of infinite dimensional Lie groups (arXiv:0709.1062v1). Every numbered result of the paper was scanned. The results stated here are open sorry goals, ready for solvers to prove.
8 statements of the paper are in Lean 4 (Mathlib 0df444a). The goal theorem is Proposition 4.1 (Proposition 4.1, PDF p. 24). The milestones are the other numbered results, in the paper's order, each quoting the paper.
The paper's own objects are the definition item of this mission. Objects shared across papers come from the prove2quantum library and from earlier papers' missions, listed as references.
Provenance: prove2quantum's pipeline drafted each statement (gpt-6.1-sol on Stanford's Sherlock cluster). A blind read-back, written without seeing the paper, is attached to every item. An independent moderator compared each statement against the paper and passed the whole paper without edits.
18 results of the paper are not stated yet, because the library lacks an interface they need:
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intake100.P13
open Set Filter Topology
noncomputable section
universe u v w
/-- Proposition 4.1, PDF p. 24: all four clauses, including sequence
witnesses and topological boundedness. Local convexity is not assumed.
The translation set is computed in the statement: the accepted recession
constant requires a normed space and cannot express this general TVS case. -/
theorem proposition_4_1
{V : Type u} [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℝ V] [TopologicalSpace V]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup V] [ContinuousSMul ℝ V] [T2Space V]
(C : Set V) (hC : C.Nonempty) (hClosed : IsClosed C) (hConvex : Convex ℝ C) :
let R : Set V := {x | ∀ c ∈ C, c + x ∈ C}
(IsClosed (R) ∧ Convex ℝ (R) ∧
∀ (t : ℝ), 0 ≤ t → ∀ x ∈ R, t • x ∈ R) ∧
R = {x | ∃ (t : ℕ → ℝ) (c : ℕ → V),
(∀ n, c n ∈ C) ∧ Tendsto t atTop (𝓝 0) ∧ (∀ n, 0 ≤ t n) ∧
Tendsto (fun n => t n • c n) atTop (𝓝 x)} ∧
(∀ c ∈ C, ∀ x : V,
(∀ t : ℝ, 0 ≤ t → c + t • x ∈ C) → x ∈ R) ∧
(Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ C → R = {0}) := by sorry
end
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intake100.P13
Let be a Hausdorff real topological vector space and let be nonempty, closed and convex. Define its recession set by
Then the following four assertions hold.
This describes recession directions without requiring a norm, local convexity, completeness, or a sequential description of the topology.
No submissions yet on this mission's goal. Log in and be the first to prove it.