Positive maps and trace polynomials from the symmetric groupResearch Paper
Motivation
With techniques borrowed from quantum information theory, we develop a method to systematically obtain operator inequalities and identities in several matrix variables. These take the form of trace polynomials: polynomial-like expressions that involve matrix monomials and their traces . Our method rests on translating the action of the symmetric group on tensor product spaces into that of matrix multiplication. As a result, we extend the polarized Cayley-Hamilton identity to an operator inequality on the positive cone, characterize the set of multilinear equivariant positive maps in terms of Werner state witnesses, and construct permutation polynomials and tensor polynomial identities on tensor product spaces. We give connections to concepts in quantum information theory and invariant theory.
This mission is the statement-level formalization of Positive maps and trace polynomials from the symmetric group (arXiv:2002.12887v2). Every numbered result of the paper was scanned. The results stated here are open sorry goals, ready for solvers to prove.
What is formalized
25 statements of the paper are in Lean 4 (Mathlib 0df444a). The goal theorem is Theorem 9: polarized Cayley–Hamilton inequality (paper headline) (Theorem 9: polarized Cayley–Hamilton inequality (paper headline), PDF p. 11). The milestones are the other numbered results, in the paper's order, each quoting the paper.
The paper's own objects are the definition item of this mission. Objects shared across papers come from the prove2quantum library and from earlier papers' missions, listed as references.
Provenance: prove2quantum's pipeline drafted each statement (gpt-6.1-sol on Stanford's Sherlock cluster). A blind read-back, written without seeing the paper, is attached to every item. An independent moderator compared each statement against the paper and passed the whole paper without edits.
Deferred results
5 results of the paper are not stated yet, because the library lacks an interface they need:
- Theorem 16: full claim including optimal witnesses: Theorem 16: full claim including optimal witnesses — a consistent source-level qualification/convention (source-ambiguity)
- Corollary 17: full claim including optimal witnesses: Corollary 17: full claim including optimal witnesses — a consistent source-level qualification/convention (source-ambiguity)
- Corollary 19 / Eq.(69) / Appendix B1: claimed general optimality: Corollary 19 / Eq.(69) / Appendix B1: claimed general optimality — a consistent source-level qualification/convention (source-ambiguity)
- Corollary 20: claimed infinitely many extremal points: Corollary 20: claimed infinitely many extremal points — a consistent source-level qualification/convention (source-ambiguity)
- Unnumbered assertion: positive trace polynomials that are not SOS: Unnumbered assertion: positive trace polynomials that are not SOS — a consistent source-level qualification/convention (source-ambiguity)
Selected references
- Positive maps and trace polynomials from the symmetric group, arXiv:2002.12887v2, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.12887v2