(13) — coercivity of the numerical Hamiltonian in the discrete gradient
ProvedMFGPlanning.Penalized.eq_13finite-differencesmean-field-gamesp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1
Assume the numerical Hamiltonian satisfies the coercivity hypothesis (G5). Then
that is: for every there is such that every grid function with has a grid point with .
This is the form in which (G5) is used to bound the discrete value function: it makes the functional of (57) coercive in the proof of Proposition 3.
Formalization Note is the maximum over all grid points and all four components of . Only (G5) is assumed, as on the page.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_MFGPlanning_Penalized_Grid import Definitions.Def_MFGPlanning_Penalized_Hyp
Formal statement
namespace MFGPlanning.Penalized
/-- (13), hal-00465404v1, §2, p. 5 (PDF 6): the coercivity (G₅) implies
lim_{‖[D_hU]‖_∞ → ∞} max_{i,j} g(x_{i,j}, [D_hU]_{i,j}) / ‖[D_hU]‖_∞ = +∞.
Formalization Note: the limit is written as "for every R there is L such that
‖[D_hU]‖_∞ ≥ L implies max_{i,j} g(x_{i,j}, [D_hU]_{i,j}) ≥ R ‖[D_hU]‖_∞", and the maximum over
grid points as an existential. Only (G₅) is assumed, as on the page. -/
theorem eq_13 (d : Data) (hG5 : G5 d) :
∀ R : ℝ, ∃ L : ℝ, ∀ U : Pt d → ℝ, L ≤ supNormDh d U →
∃ p : Pt d, R * supNormDh d U ≤ d.g p (Dh d U p) := by sorry
end MFGPlanning.Penalized
Source
Achdou, Camilli, Capuzzo-Dolcetta, Mean field games: numerical methods for the planning problem, hal-00465404v1 (2010), §2, eq. (13), p. 5
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.