Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Theorem 4, (A.5)–(A.6) — breakpoint utility representation

Proved
InfFisher.Linear.utility_set_eq_breakpoints

by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

convex-optimizationfair-divisionfisher-marketp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

For normalized linear valuations on [0,1][0,1][0,1] with intercepts 2≥d1≥⋯≥dn≥02\ge d_1\ge\cdots\ge d_n\ge02≥d1​≥⋯≥dn​≥0, membership in the feasible utility set is equivalent to nonnegative utilities and the existence of intermediate breakpoints in [0,1][0,1][0,1] whose interval utility formulas dominate each coordinate:

ui≤ci2(ai2−ai−12)+di(ai−ai−1),a0=0, an=1.u_i\le\frac{c_i}{2}(a_i^2-a_{i-1}^2)+d_i(a_i-a_{i-1}),\quad a_0=0,\ a_n=1.ui​≤2ci​​(ai2​−ai−12​)+di​(ai​−ai−1​),a0​=0, an​=1.

This is the first breakpoint reformulation in the proof of Theorem 4, immediately before the introduction of the auxiliary zi,wiz_i,w_izi​,wi​ variables in (A.6). The displayed inequalities themselves force the breakpoints into order under the stated valuation assumptions.

Formalization Note Lean buyer iii uses endpoints ai,ai+1a_i,a_{i+1}ai​,ai+1​; n≥1n\ge1n≥1 excludes the inconsistent zero buyer endpoint case.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_InfFisher_Linear_Setting
Formal statement
namespace InfFisher.Linear

open MeasureTheory

/-- Gao–Kroer, proof of Theorem 4, (A.5)–(A.6): a breakpoint description of `U`. -/
theorem utility_set_eq_breakpoints {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (c d : ℕ → ℝ)
    (hnorm : ∀ i < n, c i / 2 + d i = 1)
    (hd : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → j < n → d j ≤ d i)
    (hd2 : d 0 ≤ 2) (hd0 : 0 ≤ d (n - 1)) :
    ∀ u : Fin n → ℝ,
      u ∈ feasUtil (volume.restrict (Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)) (linVal c d n) ↔
        (∀ i, 0 ≤ u i) ∧
        ∃ a : ℕ → ℝ,
          a 0 = 0 ∧ a n = 1 ∧
          (∀ k, 1 ≤ k → k ≤ n - 1 → 0 ≤ a k ∧ a k ≤ 1) ∧
          ∀ i : Fin n,
            u i ≤ c i.val / 2 * (a (i.val + 1) ^ 2 - a i.val ^ 2) +
              d i.val * (a (i.val + 1) - a i.val) := by sorry

end InfFisher.Linear
Source
Gao & Kroer, Infinite-Dimensional Fisher Markets and Tractable Fair Division, arXiv:2010.03025v5, proof of Theorem 4, (A.5)–(A.6), pp. a10–a11 (PDF 45–46)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me