Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Corollary 2.6 — ZD=ZRZ_D = Z_RZD​=ZR​ for all weights w≥0w \ge 0w≥0

Proved
SingleMachineSched.LPRelax.corollary_2_6

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

linear-programminglp-relaxationmean-busy-timep2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1schedulingtime-indexed

Let nnn jobs have integral processing times pj>0p_j > 0pj​>0, integral release dates rj≥0r_j \ge 0rj​≥0 and weights wj≥0w_j \ge 0wj​≥0, and let the horizon T∈NT \in \mathbb NT∈N bound the makespan of some feasible nonpreemptive schedule. Then the preemptive time-indexed relaxation (D) with horizon TTT and the mean busy time relaxation (R) have the same optimal value:

ZD=ZR.Z_D = Z_R .ZD​=ZR​.

Both are lower bounds on the optimum of 1 ∣ rj ∣ ∑wjCj1\,|\,r_j\,|\,\sum w_j C_j1∣rj​∣∑wj​Cj​. The equality means that the pseudopolynomial LP (D) and the exponentially constrained LP (R) give the same bound, and that both are attained by the LP schedule; the approximation results of the paper are measured against this common value.

Formalization Note No ordering of the jobs is assumed: the statement holds for every nonnegative weight vector, and the LP schedule does not appear in it. The paper takes TTT to be an upper bound on the makespan of an optimal schedule; here TTT is only required to bound the makespan of some feasible nonpreemptive schedule (with real start times), which every such TTT does, so the statement covers the paper's. The paper's second sentence, that the common value can be computed in O(nlog⁡n)O(n \log n)O(nlogn) time, is a running-time claim and is not formalized.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SingleMachineSched_Shared_RelaxationR
import Definitions.Def_SingleMachineSched_LPRelax_RelaxationD
Formal statement
namespace SingleMachineSched.LPRelax

/-- Corollary 2.6: for any nonnegative weights, the preemptive time-indexed relaxation (D) and
the mean busy time relaxation (R) have the same optimal value, `Z_D = Z_R`. -/
theorem corollary_2_6 {n : ℕ} (p r : Fin n → ℕ) (w : Fin n → ℝ) (T : ℕ)
    (hp : ∀ j, 0 < p j) (hw : ∀ j, 0 ≤ w j) (hT : IsMakespanBound p r T) :
    zD p r w T = Shared.zR p r w := by sorry

end SingleMachineSched.LPRelax
Source
Goemans, Queyranne, Schulz, Skutella & Wang, Single Machine Scheduling with Release Dates, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 15(2) (2002), p. 173, Corollary 2.6
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me