Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 4.18, reduced case (Fig. 2, Cases 1–3) — expected make-span at most 7/4 · t_opt

Proved
AlgMechDesign.Randomized.reduced_case_bound

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

inequalityp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1randomized-mechanismscheduling

Let β=4/3\beta = 4/3β=4/3 and a,b,c,d≥0a, b, c, d \ge 0a,b,c,d≥0. Consider the four-task instance of Fig. 2 for two agents: task k1k_1k1​ with times (a,βa)(a, \beta a)(a,βa), k2k_2k2​ with (b,βb)(b, \beta b)(b,βb), l1l_1l1​ with (c,βc)(c, \beta c)(c,βc) and l2l_2l2​ with (βd,d)(\beta d, d)(βd,d) for agents (1,2)(1, 2)(1,2). The mechanism gives k1,k2k_1, k_2k1​,k2​ to agent 1 and gives each of l1,l2l_1, l_2l1​,l2​ to either agent with probability 1/21/21/2; the optimal allocation gives k1,l1k_1, l_1k1​,l1​ to agent 1 and k2,l2k_2, l_2k2​,l2​ to agent 2. If both agents finish at the same time under the optimal allocation, topt=a+c=βb+dt_{opt} = a + c = \beta b + dtopt​=a+c=βb+d, then the expected make-span over the four equally likely allocations satisfies

tbmw=14(max⁡(a+b+c+βd, 0)+max⁡(a+b+c, d)+max⁡(a+b+βd, βc)+max⁡(a+b, βc+d))≤74(a+c).t_{bmw} = \tfrac14\Big(\max(a+b+c+\beta d,\ 0) + \max(a+b+c,\ d) + \max(a+b+\beta d,\ \beta c) + \max(a+b,\ \beta c + d)\Big) \le \tfrac74 (a + c).tbmw​=41​(max(a+b+c+βd, 0)+max(a+b+c, d)+max(a+b+βd, βc)+max(a+b, βc+d))≤47​(a+c).

This is the case to which the paper reduces Lemma 4.18; zero times represent instances with fewer than four tasks.

Formalization Note The three cases of the paper are combined into one inequality with explicit maxima, with β=4/3\beta = 4/3β=4/3 substituted.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace AlgMechDesign.Randomized

/-- The reduced case of Lemma 4.18 (Fig. 2, Cases 1–3, pp. 184–185), with `β = 4/3`: tasks
`k₁, k₂` (times `(a, βa)` and `(b, βb)`) go to agent 1, while `l₁` (times `(c, βc)`) and `l₂`
(times `(βd, d)`) are each allocated to either agent with probability `1/2`. If opt's two
finishing times agree, `a + c = βb + d`, the expected make-span is at most `7/4 · (a + c)`. -/
theorem reduced_case_bound (a b c d : ℝ) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hd : 0 ≤ d)
    (hopt : a + c = 4 / 3 * b + d) :
    (1 / 4 : ℝ) * (max (a + b + c + 4 / 3 * d) 0 + max (a + b + c) d +
        max (a + b + 4 / 3 * d) (4 / 3 * c) + max (a + b) (4 / 3 * c + d)) ≤
      7 / 4 * (a + c) := by sorry

end AlgMechDesign.Randomized
Source
Nisan, Ronen, Algorithmic Mechanism Design, Games Econ. Behav. 35, 2001, pp. 184–185, proof of Lemma 4.18, Fig. 2 and Cases 1–3
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me