Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Imaginary coupling β=ib∈R\beta = ib \in \mathbb{R}β=ib∈R gives exactly c≤1c \le 1c≤1

Proved
LiouvilleFieldTheory.centralCharge_imaginary_coupling

by Lucas · Oct 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conformal-field-theoryliouville-theorymathematical-physics

Write the coupling constant as b=−iβb = -i\betab=−iβ, i.e. β=ib\beta = ibβ=ib. As β\betaβ ranges over the nonzero real numbers, the central charge c=1+6(b+1/b)2c = 1 + 6(b + 1/b)^2c=1+6(b+1/b)2 ranges exactly over the real numbers c≤1c \le 1c≤1:

{ 1+6(b+1b)2  :  b=−iβ, β∈R∖{0}}  =  (−∞,1]⊂C.\left\{\, 1 + 6\left(b + \tfrac1b\right)^2 \;:\; b = -i\beta,\ \beta \in \mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\} \right\} \;=\; (-\infty, 1] \subset \mathbb{C}.{1+6(b+b1​)2:b=−iβ, β∈R∖{0}}=(−∞,1]⊂C.

In the source, the three-point structure constant for c∈(−∞,1)c \in (-\infty, 1)c∈(−∞,1) is written in terms of β=ib∈R\beta = ib \in \mathbb{R}β=ib∈R; this statement records that real β\betaβ covers that range of central charges, and in fact produces exactly c∈(−∞,1]c \in (-\infty, 1]c∈(−∞,1] (the value c=1c = 1c=1 occurs at β=±1\beta = \pm 1β=±1).

Formalization Note Real numbers c≤1c \le 1c≤1 are encoded as complex numbers with zero imaginary part and real part at most 111.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_LiouvilleFieldTheory_kinematics
open Complex
Formal statement
namespace LiouvilleFieldTheory

theorem centralCharge_imaginary_coupling :
    {c : ℂ | ∃ β : ℝ, β ≠ 0 ∧ centralCharge (-I * β) = c} =
      {c : ℂ | c.im = 0 ∧ c.re ≤ 1} := by
  sorry

end LiouvilleFieldTheory
Source
Wikipedia, "Liouville field theory", revision oldid=1376996606 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liouville_field_theory&oldid=1376996606); section Correlation functions and DOZZ formula (p. 3): "For c ∈ (−∞, 1), the three-point structure constant is ... where β = ib ∈ ℝ".
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)

Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted the Lean statement, at the explicit request of the proposal owner. It was not produced by an independent, blind auditor, and the author knew the intended meaning while writing it. Reviewers must not treat it as independent confirmation of faithfulness; compare it against the Lean code directly.

The set of complex numbers of the form c(−iβ)=1+6(−iβ+(−iβ)−1)2c(-i\beta) = 1 + 6\bigl(-i\beta + (-i\beta)^{-1}\bigr)^2c(−iβ)=1+6(−iβ+(−iβ)−1)2 with β\betaβ a real number, β≠0\beta \neq 0β=0, is asserted to be equal to the set of complex numbers zzz with Im⁡z=0\operatorname{Im} z = 0Imz=0 and Re⁡z≤1\operatorname{Re} z \le 1Rez≤1 (non-strict inequality). Both inclusions are claimed: every such c(−iβ)c(-i\beta)c(−iβ) is real and at most 111, and every real number ≤1\le 1≤1 arises from some nonzero real β\betaβ.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me