Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The SDP measure bounds PPT distillable entanglement

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P83.upperBound

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let ρ\rhoρ be a positive semidefinite, trace-one operator on arbitrary nonzero finite-dimensional complex spaces A⊗BA\otimes BA⊗B. Partial transpose TBT_BTB​ is taken in a fixed product basis. For k>0k>0k>0, let FΓ(ρ,k)F_\Gamma(\rho,k)FΓ​(ρ,k) be the maximum of Re⁡Tr⁡(ρQ)\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}(\rho Q)ReTr(ρQ) subject to 0≤Q≤I0\le Q\le I0≤Q≤I and −I/k≤TB(Q)≤I/k-I/k\le T_B(Q)\le I/k−I/k≤TB​(Q)≤I/k. Define EΓ(ρ)E_\Gamma(\rho)EΓ​(ρ) as the supremum of real rates rrr for which FΓ(ρ⊗n,2nr)→1F_\Gamma(\rho^{\otimes n},2^{nr})\to1FΓ​(ρ⊗n,2nr)→1. Define W(ρ)W(\rho)W(ρ) by SDP (7), maximizing Re⁡Tr⁡(TB(ρ)R)\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}(T_B(\rho)R)ReTr(TB​(ρ)R) over Hermitian RRR with ∥R∥∞≤1\|R\|_\infty\le1∥R∥∞​≤1 and TB(R)≥0T_B(R)\ge0TB​(R)≥0, and put EW(ρ)=log⁡2W(ρ)E_W(\rho)=\log_2W(\rho)EW​(ρ)=log2​W(ρ). Then every achievable rate rrr satisfies r≤EW(ρ)r\le E_W(\rho)r≤EW​(ρ), and

EΓ(ρ)≤EW(ρ).E_\Gamma(\rho)\le E_W(\rho).EΓ​(ρ)≤EW​(ρ).

This gives an upper bound on vanishing-error PPT distillation without assuming that its supremum rate is achieved.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P83
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P83

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P11 (Loewner)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P32 (partialTranspose)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P34 (supportProjector)

variable {A B C D : Type*}

variable [Fintype A] [Fintype B] [Fintype C] [Fintype D]

variable [DecidableEq A] [DecidableEq B] [DecidableEq C] [DecidableEq D]

/-- Theorem 1, PDF p.3: every achievable rate, hence its supremum, is bounded
by E_W. There is no assumption that E_Gamma itself is achievable. -/
theorem upperBound [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B]
    (rho : Matrix (A × B) (A × B) ℂ) (hrho : IsDensityMatrix rho) :
    (∀ r : ℝ, PPTAchievableRate rho r → r ≤ entanglementW rho) ∧
      entanglementGamma rho ≤ entanglementW rho := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P83

end
Source
Improved Semidefinite Programming Upper Bound on Distillable Entanglement, arXiv:1601.07940v4, PDF p. 3, Theorem 1; abstract seed: the new upper bound
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let A,BA,BA,B be finite nonempty types with decidable equality, and let ρ\rhoρ be a complex matrix indexed by A×BA\times BA×B that is positive semidefinite and has trace 111. For a matrix XXX on this space, write X(a,b),(a′,b′)Γ=X(a,b′),(a′,b)X^\Gamma_{(a,b),(a',b')}=X_{(a,b'),(a',b)}X(a,b),(a′,b′)Γ​=X(a,b′),(a′,b)​, let ∥⋅∥op\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{op}}∥⋅∥op​ be the operator norm induced by the Euclidean norm, and write X≤YX\le YX≤Y when Y−XY-XY−X is positive semidefinite. Define

w(ρ)=sup⁡R=R†, ∥R∥op≤1RΓ≥0Re⁡tr⁡(ρΓR),W(ρ)=log⁡2w(ρ),w(\rho)=\sup_{\substack{R=R^\dagger,\ \|R\|_{\mathrm{op}}\le1\\R^\Gamma\ge0}} \operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(\rho^\Gamma R), \qquad W(\rho)=\log_2 w(\rho),w(ρ)=R=R†, ∥R∥op​≤1RΓ≥0​sup​Retr(ρΓR),W(ρ)=log2​w(ρ),

and, for real kkk, define

F(ρ,k)=sup⁡k>0, 0≤Q≤I−k−1I≤QΓ≤k−1IRe⁡tr⁡(ρQ).F(\rho,k)= \sup_{\substack{k>0,\ 0\le Q\le I\\-k^{-1}I\le Q^\Gamma\le k^{-1}I}} \operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(\rho Q).F(ρ,k)=k>0, 0≤Q≤I−k−1I≤QΓ≤k−1I​sup​Retr(ρQ).

Here the supremum defining FFF is over matrices QQQ, with the displayed condition k>0k>0k>0 part of feasibility. For each natural nnn, let ρ[n]\rho^{[n]}ρ[n] have entries ρ(x,y),(x′,y′)[n]=∏i=0n−1ρ(xi,yi),(xi′,yi′)\rho^{[n]}_{(x,y),(x',y')}=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1}\rho_{(x_i,y_i),(x'_i,y'_i)}ρ(x,y),(x′,y′)[n]​=∏i=0n−1​ρ(xi​,yi​),(xi′​,yi′​)​, indexed by An×BnA^n\times B^nAn×Bn. A real rate rrr is called achievable here precisely when F(ρ[n],2nr)→1F(\rho^{[n]},2^{nr})\to1F(ρ[n],2nr)→1 as n→∞n\to\inftyn→∞, and put Γ(ρ)=sup⁡{r∈R:r is achievable}\Gamma(\rho)=\sup\{r\in\mathbb R:r\text{ is achievable}\}Γ(ρ)=sup{r∈R:r is achievable}. The theorem asserts both that every such real rrr satisfies r≤W(ρ)r\le W(\rho)r≤W(ρ) and that Γ(ρ)≤W(ρ)\Gamma(\rho)\le W(\rho)Γ(ρ)≤W(ρ). Achievability imposes no separate condition r≥0r\ge0r≥0, and the sequence includes n=0n=0n=0, whose matrix is the one-dimensional matrix with entry 111.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me