Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Corollary 3 (Secret Key Capacity of Degraded DMBCs)

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76.degraded_capacity

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let S,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,Z be finite nonempty alphabets and let W(x,y,z∣s)W(x,y,z\mid s)W(x,y,z∣s) be a normalized discrete memoryless broadcast channel. All entropies and information quantities are in bits. For an input law ppp, information quantities below use exactly the induced law p(s)W(x,y,z∣s)p(s)W(x,y,z\mid s)p(s)W(x,y,z∣s).

Alice draws a uniform finite message MMM, uses a possibly stochastic encoder to excite nnn channel uses, and observes (M,Xn)(M,X^n)(M,Xn). A public forward message Φ=ϕ(M,Xn)\Phi=\phi(M,X^n)Φ=ϕ(M,Xn) is visible to Bob and Eve. Their keys are KA=kA(M,Xn)K_A=k_A(M,X^n)KA​=kA​(M,Xn) and KB=kB(Yn,Φ)K_B=k_B(Y^n,\Phi)KB​=kB​(Yn,Φ). All design maps are fixed publicly before observations. Message and public alphabets follow the fixed-rate ceiling convention; the key alphabet at rate RRR has exactly 2⌈nR⌉2^{\lceil nR\rceil}2⌈nR⌉ labels. A weakly achievable rate RRR has one sequence of such codes with disagreement tending to zero, I(KA;Zn,Φ)/n→0I(K_A;Z^n,\Phi)/n\to0I(KA​;Zn,Φ)/n→0, and lim inf⁡H(KA)/n≥R\liminf H(K_A)/n\ge RliminfH(KA​)/n≥R.

Let Λ:S→[0,L]\Lambda:S\to[0,L]Λ:S→[0,L] be bounded and nonnegative, and let Γ>0\Gamma>0Γ>0 be admissible, meaning that a normalized input law of expected cost at most Γ\GammaΓ exists. Every operational code obeys n−1∑iΛ(Si)≤Γn^{-1}\sum_i\Lambda(S_i)\le\Gamman−1∑i​Λ(Si​)≤Γ almost surely; each single-letter optimization obeys ∑sp(s)Λ(s)≤Γ\sum_s p(s)\Lambda(s)\le\Gamma∑s​p(s)Λ(s)≤Γ. Excitation and public rates are unrestricted.

Assume the channel is degraded in Bob's favor. Physical degradation is (X,S)−Y−Z(X,S)-Y-Z(X,S)−Y−Z. Stochastic degradation permits a coupling W′(x,y,z∣s)=WXY(x,y∣s)d(z∣y)W'(x,y,z\mid s)=W_{XY}(x,y\mid s)d(z\mid y)W′(x,y,z∣s)=WXY​(x,y∣s)d(z∣y) preserving both WXYW_{XY}WXY​ and WXZW_{XZ}WXZ​ for a normalized kernel ddd. Then

CSK(Γ)=max⁡p: EΛ(S)≤Γ{I(X,S;Y)−I(X,S;Z)}.C_{\rm SK}(\Gamma)=\max_{p:\,\mathbb E\Lambda(S)\le\Gamma}\{I(X,S;Y)-I(X,S;Z)\}.CSK​(Γ)=p:EΛ(S)≤Γmax​{I(X,S;Y)−I(X,S;Z)}.

The maximum is attained.

This specializes the operational capacity to a single input-law optimization.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P76
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76

noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators

open Filter Set

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

-- Exact pinned primitives, inspected at their definitions before reuse.

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P56 (IsLaw)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier30.P12 (IsStochastic)

variable {S X Y Z : Type} [Fintype S] [Fintype X] [Fintype Y] [Fintype Z]
  [Nonempty S] [Nonempty X] [Nonempty Y] [Nonempty Z]

variable {n u w : ℕ}

/-- PDF p.5, Corollary 3, (12): stochastic degradation preserves Alice's X. -/
theorem degraded_capacity (W : DMBC S X Y Z) (cost : S → ℝ) (Gamma : ℝ)
    (hcost : AdmissibleCost cost Gamma) (hdeg : SenderExcitedDegraded W) :
    ∃ p : S → ℝ, CostFeasibleInput cost Gamma p ∧
      IsGreatest {v | ∃ q, CostFeasibleInput cost Gamma q ∧ v = advantage W q}
        (advantage W p) ∧ senderExcitedCapacity W cost (some Gamma) = (advantage W p : EReal) := by sorry

end

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76
Source
The Sender-Excited Secret Key Agreement Model: Capacity, Reliability and Secrecy Exponents, arXiv:1107.4148v4, PDF p. 5, Corollary 3 (Secret Key Capacity of Degraded DMBCs)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let S,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,Z be finite nonempty alphabets, let Ws(x,y,z)≥0W_s(x,y,z)\ge0Ws​(x,y,z)≥0 sum to 111 for each sss, and let c:S→Rc:S\to\mathbb Rc:S→R, Γ∈R\Gamma\in\mathbb RΓ∈R satisfy Γ>0\Gamma>0Γ>0, 0≤c(s)≤L0\le c(s)\le L0≤c(s)≤L for some real LLL and every sss, and the existence of a probability law on SSS of expected cost at most Γ\GammaΓ. Suppose also that there exists a stochastic kernel d(y,z)≥0d(y,z)\ge0d(y,z)≥0, with ∑zd(y,z)=1\sum_zd(y,z)=1∑z​d(y,z)=1 for every yyy, such that

∑yWs(x,y,z)=∑y(∑tWs(x,y,t))d(y,z)for every s,x,z.\sum_y W_s(x,y,z) =\sum_y\left(\sum_t W_s(x,y,t)\right)d(y,z) \quad\text{for every }s,x,z.y∑​Ws​(x,y,z)=y∑​(t∑​Ws​(x,y,t))d(y,z)for every s,x,z.

Then there exists a probability law ppp on SSS with ∑sp(s)c(s)≤Γ\sum_sp(s)c(s)\le\Gamma∑s​p(s)c(s)≤Γ whose value A(p)=Ip((X,S);Y)−Ip((X,S);Z)A(p)=I_p((X,S);Y)-I_p((X,S);Z)A(p)=Ip​((X,S);Y)−Ip​((X,S);Z), computed in bits under p(s)Ws(x,y,z)p(s)W_s(x,y,z)p(s)Ws​(x,y,z), is greatest among all such cost-feasible laws, and the extended-real sender-excited capacity equals A(p)A(p)A(p). This capacity is the supremum of nonnegative real rates RRR admitting codes at every positive length NNN, each with a uniform message m<MNm<M_Nm<MN​, a conditional excitation distribution eN,me_{N,m}eN,m​, a public function FN(m,xN)F_N(m,x^N)FN​(m,xN), Alice’s key KA(m,xN)K_A(m,x^N)KA​(m,xN), and Bob’s key KB(yN,FN(m,xN))K_B(y^N,F_N(m,x^N))KB​(yN,FN​(m,xN)). Fixed nonnegative constants rM,rP,rKr_M,r_P,r_KrM​,rP​,rK​ must give message and public-range sizes 2⌈NrM⌉+,2⌈NrP⌉+2^{\lceil Nr_M\rceil_+},2^{\lceil Nr_P\rceil_+}2⌈NrM​⌉+​,2⌈NrP​⌉+​ and key-range size at most 2NrK2^{Nr_K}2NrK​; every excitation word with positive encoder probability must have total cost at most NΓN\GammaNΓ. Under weights MN−1eN,m(sN)∏iWsi(xi,yi,zi)M_N^{-1}e_{N,m}(s^N)\prod_iW_{s_i}(x_i,y_i,z_i)MN−1​eN,m​(sN)∏i​Wsi​​(xi​,yi​,zi​), eventual H(KA)/N≥R−εH(K_A)/N\ge R-\varepsilonH(KA​)/N≥R−ε must hold for every ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, key disagreement must tend to zero, and I(KA;(ZN,FN))/NI(K_A;(Z^N,F_N))/NI(KA​;(ZN,FN​))/N must tend to zero.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me