Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Endpoint-support peeling: h(n,d)≤h(n−d,d)+h(n−1,d−1)h(n,d)\le h(n-d,d)+h(n-1,d-1)h(n,d)≤h(n−d,d)+h(n−1,d−1) for connected layer families

Proved
Hirsch.clf_endpoint_peeling

by elmismisimoxhunca · Sep 7, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

combinatoricsconnected-layer-familieshirsch-conjecture

Let h(n,d)h(n,d)h(n,d) be any monotone (in nnn) upper bound for the height L+1L+1L+1 of connected layer families of rank ddd on at most nnn symbols. Then for every family of rank d≥1d\ge1d≥1 on nnn symbols,

L+1≤h(n−d, d)+h(n−1, d−1).L+1\le h(n-d,\,d)+h(n-1,\,d-1).L+1≤h(n−d,d)+h(n−1,d−1).

Proof. Fix a base TTT of the last layer and let ttt be the first layer containing any symbol of TTT. The ttt earlier layers avoid all ddd symbols of TTT, hence form a family on at most n−dn-dn−d symbols: t≤h(n−d,d)t\le h(n-d,d)t≤h(n−d,d). A symbol x∈Tx\in Tx∈T present in layer ttt is present in the last layer, so by the interval axiom its star meets every layer from ttt onward; restricting to the star and deleting xxx yields a family of rank d−1d-1d−1 on at most n−1n-1n−1 symbols of height L−t+1≤h(n−1,d−1)L-t+1\le h(n-1,d-1)L−t+1≤h(n−1,d−1).

This is the justified one-sided analogue of the Kalai--Kleitman recursion. Its exact majorant is a cumulative restricted-partition function, which is superpolynomial, so the recurrence alone does not give a polynomial bound.

Formalization Note The bound h is quantified over all families via hmax; V is restricted to Type so that families on subtypes of V can be formed.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_Hirsch_clf
Formal statement
namespace Hirsch

theorem clf_endpoint_peeling
    (h : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ)
    (hmax : ∀ (V : Type) [DecidableEq V] [Fintype V] (d : ℕ) (F : CLF V d),
      F.len + 1 ≤ h (Fintype.card V) d)
    (hmono : ∀ n n' d, n ≤ n' → h n d ≤ h n' d)
    {V : Type} [DecidableEq V] [Fintype V] (d : ℕ) (hd : 1 ≤ d) (F : CLF V d) :
    F.len + 1 ≤ h (Fintype.card V - d) d + h (Fintype.card V - 1) (d - 1) := by sorry

end Hirsch
Source
Campaign research notes (2026-09-06), Prove2Me mission 'The Polynomial Hirsch Conjecture', discussion thread; independently audited on-paper proofs, note 'deep_astra_clf' Theorem 5.1; compare G. Kalai, D. Kleitman, Bull. AMS 26 (1992), the Lemma

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactJoin Slack© 2026 Prove2Me