Corollary 4 (19): WPICC is not contained in GW
OpenQAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P29.wpicc_not_contained_in_globalAll Bell scenarios have independent finite, nonempty Alice and Bob input and output alphabets. A behavior is a nonnegative conditional output law normalized at every input pair; imposes both no-signaling marginal identities. Processing uses one initial box with rules and randomness fixed independently of the supplied behavior. There exist initial and final scenarios and a WPICC wiring for which no global wiring has the same action on every no-signaling input:
This is non-inclusion of classes of operations on their common domain, rather than a distinction between declared domain types. WPICC uses Appendix A’s fixed no-preparation LOSR branch and random adaptive preparation branches in which at least one party measures before the final inputs.
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P29
noncomputable section
open scoped BigOperators ENNReal
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P29
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Advance50.P47
(Box IsCorrelation IsNoSignaling HasLocalModel TwoLocalBoxes losrTransform
correlationMixture)
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P56 (IsLaw)
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P47 (Law)
/-- PDF p.6, Corollary 4, (19). Nonmembership means that no global wiring
agrees on every NS input, independently of raw extensions outside that domain. -/
theorem wpicc_not_contained_in_global :
∃ (s t : BellScenario) (w : BellOperation s t), IsWPICC w ∧ ¬ HasGWRestriction w := by sorry
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P29
end
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol
There exist scenarios and an operation between their real behavior arrays with the following two properties. First, on all nonsignaling source correlations, is a probability mixture, with a probability mass function on an arbitrary type, of deterministic preparations: either choose each source input from its own target input and each final output from its own target input and source outcome; or fix Alice’s input first and, for each Alice outcome, either choose Bob’s input from his target input while Alice’s output ignores Bob’s outcome, or fix Bob’s input and permit both outputs to depend on Bob’s outcome; or use the symmetric Bob-first construction. In these cases each final output can depend on its own target input and the stated available outcomes, and the resulting array sums the selected source entries with indicators enforcing those outputs. Second, there are no nonnegative normalized kernels and such that, for every nonsignaling correlation ,
Here all four sizes of each scenario are positive integers, and a nonsignaling correlation is a nonnegative array normalized over outputs at each input pair, with Bob’s marginal independent of Alice’s input and Alice’s marginal independent of Bob’s input. The claim concerns agreement on this set; it does not require any particular behavior of elsewhere.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.