Eq. (4):
ProvedChenBullwhip.Centralized.eq_4bullwhip-effectinventoryp2o-batch-pfp1bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1supply-chain
For the retailer's moving-average order-up-to policy with window , lead-time parameter , safety factor and constant , the order satisfies, for every period and every outcome,
The two moving averages and share all but their first and last terms. The identity reduces the order to two demands periods apart plus a safety-stock correction, and it is the starting point of the variance computation behind Theorem 2.2.
Formalization Note This is a pathwise identity: it holds for every outcome and its proof uses no distributional fact. The demand model is on a probability space. is real division and is assumed.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_ChenBullwhip_Centralized_AR1Demand import Definitions.Def_ChenBullwhip_Centralized_Policy
Formal statement
namespace ChenBullwhip.Centralized
theorem eq_4 {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] {P : MeasureTheory.Measure Ω}
[MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure P]
(X : AR1Demand P) (C z : ℝ) (L p : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (t : ℤ) (ω : Ω) :
X.order C z L p t ω
= (L : ℝ) * ((X.D (t - 1) ω - X.D (t - p - 1) ω) / p) + X.D (t - 1) ω
+ z * (X.sigmaHat C p t ω - X.sigmaHat C p (t - 1) ω)
∧ X.order C z L p t ω
= (1 + (L : ℝ) / p) * X.D (t - 1) ω - ((L : ℝ) / p) * X.D (t - p - 1) ω
+ z * (X.sigmaHat C p t ω - X.sigmaHat C p (t - 1) ω) := by sorry
end ChenBullwhip.Centralized
Source
Chen, Drezner, Ryan and Simchi-Levi, Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain, Management Science 46 (2000), p. 438, Eq. (4)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.