Lemma A.1 — is non-decreasing
ProvedDemandResponse.SecondBest.lemmaA1_F0demand-responsep2o-batch-pfp1ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1principal-agentstochastic-control
Let be the total cost of volatility borne by the producer when the unit cost of volatility is and the payment rate for volatility reduction is ((A.10)), and let
Then for every real ,
and is non-decreasing on .
The lemma eliminates the volatility payment from the producer's problem: the optimal equals minus the producer's unit cost of volatility, and what remains is a monotone function of that cost. This is what turns the producer's HJB equation (A.11) into a scalar minimisation over .
Formalization Note. The statement is for every real , without a sign hypothesis; for the point lies outside , but so the identity still holds.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_DemandResponse_SecondBest_Hamiltonian
Formal statement
namespace DemandResponse.SecondBest
/-- Lemma A.1 (arXiv:1810.09063v3, p. 29): `F₀(q) = f₀(q, -q) = -2 H_v(-q)`, and `F₀` is
non-decreasing. Stated for every real `q`. -/
theorem lemmaA1_F0 {N d : ℕ} (P : Params N d) :
(∀ q : ℝ, F0 P q = f0 P q (-q) ∧ f0 P q (-q) = -2 * Hv P (-q)) ∧ Monotone (F0 P) := by sorry
end DemandResponse.SecondBest
Source
arXiv:1810.09063v3, Appendix A.3, (A.10) and Lemma A.1 (p. 29)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.