Positive pure-loss coherent model balance at every nonzero transmission
ProvedQAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakenext100.P72.pureLossCoherentNoThresholdprove2quantum
Let and , and set . Define the signed coherent and EPR model expressions by
For the positive root , the source's high-modulation coherent inequality holds. The finite-modulation product also satisfies , and
These signed model expressions remain positive for arbitrarily small positive . The statement excludes both zero transmission and zero coherent modulation; it asserts no loss-independent positive yield and no general attack reduction.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakenext100_P72
Formal statement
noncomputable section
open Filter
open scoped Topology
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakenext100.P72
/-- Grosshans--Grangier, PDF p.4, III.C, (53), linked to the finite-V
expressions (44), (54)--(57). Positive transmission and nonzero coherent
modulation are explicit; no positive rate is asserted at G=0. -/
theorem pureLossCoherentNoThreshold
(G V : ℝ) (hG : 0 < G) (hGloss : G ≤ 1) (hV : 1 < V) :
1 - G < noiseThreshold G 1 ∧
varianceProduct G ((1 - G) / G) V 1 < 1 ∧
0 < coherentExpression G ((1 - G) / G) V ∧
coherentExpression G ((1 - G) / G) V = eprExpression G ((1 - G) / G) V ∧
coherentExpression G ((1 - G) / G) V = lossExpression G V := by sorry
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakenext100.P72
end
Source
Reverse reconciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continuous variables, arXiv:quant-ph/0204127v1, PDF p. 4, III.C, (53): pure-loss coherent protocols have no 3 dB threshold
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol
For every with and , put , and define
Then the following five claims hold simultaneously:
The endpoint is included, while is excluded.
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.