Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Every NPT state is distillable via PPT-preserving channels

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P43.npt_distillable

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All operators act on a finite bipartite space Cd⊗Cd\mathbb C^d\otimes\mathbb C^dCd⊗Cd in a fixed product basis. Write Γ=T2\Gamma=T_2Γ=T2​ for Bob's partial transpose and Pm=∣ψm⟩⟨ψm∣P_m=|\psi_m\rangle\langle\psi_m|Pm​=∣ψm​⟩⟨ψm​∣, where ∣ψm⟩=m−1/2∑i∣ii⟩|\psi_m\rangle=m^{-1/2}\sum_i|ii\rangle∣ψm​⟩=m−1/2∑i​∣ii⟩. A density operator is positive semidefinite with complex trace exactly one. An admissible PPT map is complex-linear, positive and trace preserving, and ΓoutTΓin\Gamma_{\rm out}T\Gamma_{\rm in}Γout​TΓin​ is positive on every positive operator. A PPT channel is additionally completely positive; complete positivity of the transpose-conjugated map is not required. Fidelity means the overlap tr⁡(PmT(ρ))\operatorname{tr}(P_m T(\rho))tr(Pm​T(ρ)).

Let d≥1d\ge1d≥1 and let ρ\rhoρ be a density operator with ρΓ≱0\rho^\Gamma\not\ge0ρΓ≥0. Then for every 0<η<10<\eta<10<η<1 there are a positive integer nnn and a PPT channel TTT from nnn copies to two qubits such that

tr⁡ ⁣(P2T(ρ⊗n))≥1−η.\operatorname{tr}\!\left(P_2 T(\rho^{\otimes n})\right)\ge1-\eta.tr(P2​T(ρ⊗n))≥1−η.

The copies are grouped as Alice's registers versus Bob's registers. This is qualitative distillability with vanishing singlet error; no rate is specified.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P43
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P43

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P04
  (gamma copies bellProjector negativeProjector werner)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P30 (IsPositiveMap)

/-- PDF p.2, Theorem 1 (abstract p.1; conclusion p.3): all finite-dimensional NPT
states are distillable through PPT-preserving channels, in the qualitative many-copy sense.
The single-copy threshold witness is stated separately and is not substituted for this goal. -/
theorem npt_distillable (d : ℕ) (hd : 0 < d)
    (rho : Matrix (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d) ℂ)
    (hrho : IsDensityMatrix rho) (hnpt : ¬ (gamma rho).PosSemidef) :
    IsPositiveConjugatePPTDistillable rho := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P43

end
Source
Distillability via protocols respecting the positivity of partial transpose, arXiv:quant-ph/0104095v2, PDF p. 2, Theorem 1
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every natural number d>0d>0d>0 and every positive semidefinite complex matrix ρ\rhoρ of trace one indexed by {0,…,d−1}2\{0,\ldots,d-1\}^2{0,…,d−1}2, assume that Γ(ρ)\Gamma(\rho)Γ(ρ) is not positive semidefinite, where (ΓX)(a,b),(a′,b′)=X(a,b′),(a′,b)(\Gamma X)_{(a,b),(a',b')}=X_{(a,b'),(a',b)}(ΓX)(a,b),(a′,b′)​=X(a,b′),(a′,b)​. Then for every real η\etaη with 0<η<10<\eta<10<η<1, there exist a positive natural number nnn and a complex-linear map TTT from matrices on {0,…,d−1}n×{0,…,d−1}n\{0,\ldots,d-1\}^n\times\{0,\ldots,d-1\}^n{0,…,d−1}n×{0,…,d−1}n to matrices on {0,1}2\{0,1\}^2{0,1}2 such that TTT preserves positive semidefiniteness, preserves the trace of every matrix, satisfies Γ(T(Γ(X)))⪰0\Gamma(T(\Gamma(X)))\succeq0Γ(T(Γ(X)))⪰0 whenever X⪰0X\succeq0X⪰0, and is completely positive, meaning that applying TTT to each matrix block of any positive semidefinite matrix with any finite ancillary index set {0,…,r−1}\{0,\ldots,r-1\}{0,…,r−1}, including r=0r=0r=0, preserves positive semidefiniteness. These choices satisfy

1−η≤Re⁡tr⁡ ⁣(B2T(ρ[n])),(ρ[n])(a,b),(a′,b′)=∏t=0n−1ρ(at,bt),(at′,bt′),1-\eta\le \operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}\!\left(B_2T(\rho^{[n]})\right), \qquad (\rho^{[n]})_{(a,b),(a',b')}= \prod_{t=0}^{n-1}\rho_{(a_t,b_t),(a'_t,b'_t)},1−η≤Retr(B2​T(ρ[n])),(ρ[n])(a,b),(a′,b′)​=t=0∏n−1​ρ(at​,bt​),(at′​,bt′​)​,

where B2B_2B2​ has entry 12\tfrac1221​ when both its row pair and its column pair have equal components, and zero otherwise. The allowed case d=1d=1d=1 has no matrix satisfying the non-positive-partial-transpose hypothesis.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me