Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Zero-coupling and duplicate-label controls

Proved
IntegerWindingExponentialIndependence.degenerateControls

by lisamegawatts · Sep 19, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

linear-algebranumber-theorytranscendencewinding

For any complex β and any integer-valued label function that is not injective: first, zero coupling collapses every integer phase to one; second, the β-phase family indexed through the repeated labels is not linearly independent over ℚ̄. These are the two principal degeneracy controls for the capstone.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_IntegerWindingExponentialIndependence_CoreV1
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.AlgebraicClosure

set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
namespace IntegerWindingExponentialIndependence

theorem degenerateControls
    {ι : Type*} (β : ℂ) (winding : ι → ℤ)
    (hduplicate : ¬ Function.Injective winding) :
    (∀ n : ℤ, integerPhase 0 n = 1) ∧
    ¬ LinearIndependent (algebraicClosure ℚ ℂ)
      (fun i => integerPhase β (winding i)) := by sorry

end IntegerWindingExponentialIndependence
Source
Derived negative controls for the integer exponential character; Mathlib linear-independence definitions.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-5.6-sol

For every universe-polymorphic index type ι\iotaι, every complex number β\betaβ, and every function w:ι→Zw:\iota\to\mathbb Zw:ι→Z that is not injective, two statements hold simultaneously: for every integer nnn, exp⁡((n:C)⋅0)=1\exp((n:\mathbb C)\cdot0)=1exp((n:C)⋅0)=1; and the ι\iotaι-indexed family (exp⁡((w(i):C)β))i∈ι\bigl(\exp((w(i):\mathbb C)\beta)\bigr)_{i\in\iota}(exp((w(i):C)β))i∈ι​ is not linearly independent over the algebraic closure of Q\mathbb QQ inside C\mathbb CC. The first conjunct includes negative and zero nnn and is independent of β\betaβ, www, and ι\iotaι. The second imposes no algebraicity, transcendence, or nonzeroness hypothesis on β\betaβ. If ι\iotaι is empty or a subsingleton, no noninjective www exists, so the hypothesis cannot be supplied and the theorem is vacuous for such index types.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 22, 2026

  • Endorsed by lisamegawatts · Sep 22, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me