Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Corollary 15: equality in the extremal-face regime

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95.corollary15

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let λ=(λ1,…,λd)\lambda=(\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_d)λ=(λ1​,…,λd​) be a finite probability vector: every entry is nonnegative and the entries sum to one. Write ρλ=∑i,jλiλj∣ii⟩⟨jj∣\rho_\lambda=\sum_{i,j}\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}|ii\rangle\langle jj|ρλ​=∑i,j​λi​λj​​∣ii⟩⟨jj∣. All logarithms have base two. A PPT operation is a completely positive, trace-preserving map LLL such that ΓoutLΓin\Gamma_{\rm out}L\Gamma_{\rm in}Γout​LΓin​ is completely positive for arbitrary finite ancillary systems; Γ\GammaΓ transposes Bob in the fixed product basis. Assume in addition that all entries of λ\lambdaλ are strictly positive, so ddd is its Schmidt rank. For K≥2K\ge2K≥2, let T(K;λ)T(K;\lambda)T(K;λ) be the minimum of the Schmidt-coordinate primal SDP (20), defined independently of operational reachability. Its real variables sijs_{ij}sij​ for j≤ij\le ij≤i and aija_{ij}aij​ for j<ij<ij<i obey sij≥λiλj/(K+1)s_{ij}\ge\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}/(K+1)sij​≥λi​λj​​/(K+1) and aij≥λiλj/(K−1)a_{ij}\ge\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}/(K-1)aij​≥λi​λj​​/(K−1), and the matrix ∑i≥jsijσijΓ+∑i>jaijαijΓ\sum_{i\ge j}s_{ij}\sigma_{ij}^{\Gamma}+\sum_{i>j}a_{ij}\alpha_{ij}^{\Gamma}∑i≥j​sij​σijΓ​+∑i>j​aij​αijΓ​ is positive semidefinite. The objective is ∑sij+∑aij\sum s_{ij}+\sum a_{ij}∑sij​+∑aij​. Here σii=∣ii⟩⟨ii∣\sigma_{ii}=|ii\rangle\langle ii|σii​=∣ii⟩⟨ii∣, while the off-diagonal symmetric and antisymmetric projectors are (∣ij⟩±∣ji⟩)(⟨ij∣±⟨ji∣)/2(|ij\rangle\pm|ji\rangle)(\langle ij|\pm\langle ji|)/2(∣ij⟩±∣ji⟩)(⟨ij∣±⟨ji∣)/2. Write T1(K;λ)T_1(K;\lambda)T1​(K;λ) for the supremum of the dual objective (28) over feasible coordinates whose associated matrix has rank exactly one; attainment is not assumed. For a finite order ttt, StS_tSt​ is the Rényi entropy, with S0S_0S0​ the log support size, S1=−∑iλilog⁡2λiS_1=-\sum_i\lambda_i\log_2\lambda_iS1​=−∑i​λi​log2​λi​ (using 0log⁡20=00\log_2 0=00log2​0=0), and St=(1−t)−1log⁡2∑iλitS_t=(1-t)^{-1}\log_2\sum_i\lambda_i^tSt​=(1−t)−1log2​∑i​λit​ otherwise. The separate infinity order is S∞=−log⁡2max⁡iλiS_\infty=-\log_2\max_i\lambda_iS∞​=−log2​maxi​λi​. Arrange the probabilities in nondecreasing order. If

∑i=1d−1λi↑K−1>λd↑,\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{d-1}\sqrt{\lambda_i^\uparrow}}{K-1}>\sqrt{\lambda_d^\uparrow},K−1∑i=1d−1​λi↑​​​>λd↑​​,

then

T(K;λ)=T1(K;λ)=2S1/2(λ)−1K−1.T(K;\lambda)=T_1(K;\lambda)=\frac{2^{S_{1/2}(\lambda)}-1}{K-1}.T(K;λ)=T1​(K;λ)=K−12S1/2​(λ)−1​.

This identifies an extremal-face regime where the rank-one lower bound is tight.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P95
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

-- Exact primitives from the pinned accepted library; no local aliases.

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Claimed50.P28 (maximallyEntangledDensity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P27 (IsProbability)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P63 (logTwo)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P19 (outer)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P18 (bipartiteTensor)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P11 (Loewner)

/-- PDF p.7, Corollary 15: strict extremal-face regime, sum stopping before the
largest entry. Printed proof refers to nonexistent Lemma 25 and the erroneous
strong universal bound (25); the statement is retained, with that dependency flagged. -/
theorem corollary15 {d : ℕ} (K : ℕ) (hK : 2 ≤ K) (lam : Fin (d + 1) → ℝ)
    (hprob : IsProbability lam) (hpos : ∀ i, 0 < lam i) (hsorted : Monotone lam)
    (hregime : (∑ i : Fin (d + 1), if i.val < d then Real.sqrt (lam i) else 0) /
      ((K : ℝ) - 1) > Real.sqrt (lam (Fin.last d))) :
    primalValue K lam = rankOneValue K lam ∧
      rankOneValue K lam = (Real.rpow 2 (schmidtRenyi (1 / 2) lam) - 1) / ((K : ℝ) - 1) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P95

end
Source
Pure-state transformations and catalysis under operations that completely preserve positivity of partial transpose, arXiv:0801.4322v2, PDF p. 7, Corollary 15: equality in the extremal-face regime
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every natural number ddd, integer K≥2K\ge2K≥2, and probability vector λ=(λ0,…,λd)\lambda=(\lambda_0,\ldots,\lambda_d)λ=(λ0​,…,λd​) satisfying 0<λ0≤⋯≤λd0<\lambda_0\le\cdots\le\lambda_d0<λ0​≤⋯≤λd​ and ∑iλi=1\sum_i\lambda_i=1∑i​λi​=1, assume

∑i=0d−1λiK−1>λd.\frac{\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}\sqrt{\lambda_i}}{K-1}>\sqrt{\lambda_d}.K−1∑i=0d−1​λi​​​>λd​​.

Put Rλ=(∑i=0dλi)2R_\lambda=(\sum_{i=0}^d\sqrt{\lambda_i})^2Rλ​=(∑i=0d​λi​​)2 and B=(KRλ−1)/(K2−1)B=(K R_\lambda-1)/(K^2-1)B=(KRλ​−1)/(K2−1). On Cd+1⊗Cd+1\mathbb C^{d+1}\otimes\mathbb C^{d+1}Cd+1⊗Cd+1, define Sii=∣ii⟩⟨ii∣S_{ii}=|ii\rangle\langle ii|Sii​=∣ii⟩⟨ii∣, Sij=12(∣ij⟩+∣ji⟩)(⟨ij∣+⟨ji∣)S_{ij}=\frac12(|ij\rangle+|ji\rangle)(\langle ij|+\langle ji|)Sij​=21​(∣ij⟩+∣ji⟩)(⟨ij∣+⟨ji∣) and Aij=12(∣ij⟩−∣ji⟩)(⟨ij∣−⟨ji∣)A_{ij}=\frac12(|ij\rangle-|ji\rangle)(\langle ij|-\langle ji|)Aij​=21​(∣ij⟩−∣ji⟩)(⟨ij∣−⟨ji∣) for j<ij<ij<i. With (ΓX)(i,j),(k,l)=X(i,l),(k,j)(\Gamma X)_{(i,j),(k,l)}=X_{(i,l),(k,j)}(ΓX)(i,j),(k,l)​=X(i,l),(k,j)​, set Q(s,a)=∑j≤isijΓSij+∑j<iaijΓAijQ(s,a)=\sum_{j\le i}s_{ij}\Gamma S_{ij}+\sum_{j<i}a_{ij}\Gamma A_{ij}Q(s,a)=∑j≤i​sij​ΓSij​+∑j<i​aij​ΓAij​. Let VVV be the real infimum of ∑j≤isij+∑j<iaij\sum_{j\le i}s_{ij}+\sum_{j<i}a_{ij}∑j≤i​sij​+∑j<i​aij​ over real arrays with Q(s,a)⪰0Q(s,a)\succeq0Q(s,a)⪰0, sij≥λiλj/(K+1)s_{ij}\ge\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}/(K+1)sij​≥λi​λj​​/(K+1), and aij≥λiλj/(K−1)a_{ij}\ge\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}/(K-1)aij​≥λi​λj​​/(K−1). Let WWW be the real supremum of

B−∑j≤iμijλiλjK+1−∑j<itijλiλjK−1B-\sum_{j\le i}\frac{\mu_{ij}\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}}{K+1} -\sum_{j<i}\frac{t_{ij}\sqrt{\lambda_i\lambda_j}}{K-1}B−j≤i∑​K+1μij​λi​λj​​​−j<i∑​K−1tij​λi​λj​​​

over real arrays satisfying μij≤1\mu_{ij}\le1μij​≤1, tij≤1t_{ij}\le1tij​≤1, Q(μ,t)⪰0Q(\mu,t)\succeq0Q(μ,t)⪰0, and rank⁡Q(μ,t)=1\operatorname{rank}Q(\mu,t)=1rankQ(μ,t)=1. Then V=WV=WV=W and W=(Rλ−1)/(K−1)W=(R_\lambda-1)/(K-1)W=(Rλ​−1)/(K−1). When d=0d=0d=0, the displayed strict hypothesis is impossible, since its left side is an empty sum divided by K−1K-1K−1, hence zero.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me