Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proposition 3.1

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P20.complete_quantum_presheaf_trivial

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let HHH be a complex Hilbert space of dimension greater than one, and let SSS be a complete presheaf on its lattice of closed subspaces, with every fibre nonempty. Then

#S(U)=1for every closed subspace U.\#S(U)=1\qquad\text{for every closed subspace }U.#S(U)=1for every closed subspace U.

Source correction. The printed proposition omits the dimension condition. The proof uses three distinct lines in a plane; in dimension one, a nonsingleton fibre at HHH and singleton fibre at 000 is a counterexample. The gluing condition includes empty covers.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P20
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P20

open Set TopologicalSpace

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Next46.P33 (Projection)

open scoped Topology

universe u v

/-- Proposition 3.1; de Groote, Observables I, PDF p./pp. 34.
Source correction: dim H > 1 is required by the three-line proof; printed statement omits it.
-/
theorem complete_quantum_presheaf_trivial {H : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace ℂ H] [CompleteSpace H]
    (hdim : 1 < Module.rank ℂ H) (S : LatticePresheaf (ClosedSubmodule ℂ H))
    (hS : IsCompletePresheaf S) (hne : ∀ U, Nonempty (S.Fiber U)) :
    ∀ U, ∃! s : S.Fiber U, True := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P20

end
Source
Observables I: Stone Spectra, arXiv:math-ph/0509020v1, PDF p. 34, Proposition 3.1
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let HHH be a complete complex inner product space, equipped with its normed additive commutative group structure, whose dimension as a complex vector space, expressed as the cardinal rank⁡CH\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb C}HrankC​H, is strictly greater than 111; infinite dimension is allowed. Suppose that to each closed complex linear subspace U⊆HU\subseteq HU⊆H a type S(U)S(U)S(U) is assigned, with a restriction map ρU,V:S(V)→S(U)\rho_{U,V}:S(V)\to S(U)ρU,V​:S(V)→S(U) for every inclusion U⊆VU\subseteq VU⊆V, such that ρU,U\rho_{U,U}ρU,U​ is the identity and ρU,V∘ρV,W=ρU,W\rho_{U,V}\circ\rho_{V,W}=\rho_{U,W}ρU,V​∘ρV,W​=ρU,W​ for nested subspaces. Assume that for every UUU, every set C\mathcal CC of closed subspaces whose supremum—its closed linear span—is UUU, and every choice sV∈S(V)s_V\in S(V)sV​∈S(V) for V∈CV\in\mathcal CV∈C, agreement of the restrictions of sVs_VsV​ and sWs_WsW​ to V∩WV\cap WV∩W whenever V∩W≠{0}V\cap W\ne\{0\}V∩W={0} implies the existence of exactly one s∈S(U)s\in S(U)s∈S(U) restricting to every sVs_VsV​. This compatibility requirement imposes no condition on pairs with zero intersection, and the gluing assumption includes the empty cover of the zero subspace. If, in addition, every S(U)S(U)S(U) is nonempty, then for every closed subspace UUU there exists exactly one element of S(U)S(U)S(U). No algebraic structure on these types of sections is assumed.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me