Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Uniform L^p bounds and L^p convergence of truncated singular integrals

Proved
DbarRegularity.truncatedSingularIntegral_lp

by Mazecto · Oct 11, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

calderon-zygmundcauchy-riemannelliptic-regularityharmonic-analysissingular-integrals

Let KKK be a measurable function on Rd\mathbb{R}^dRd and B≥0B\ge0B≥0 such that

∣K(x)∣≤B∣x∣−d (x≠0),∫∣x∣≥2∣y∣∣K(x−y)−K(x)∣ dx≤B (y≠0),∫R1<∣x∣<R2K(x) dx=0 (0<R1<R2<∞).|K(x)|\le B|x|^{-d}\ (x\ne0),\qquad \int_{|x|\ge2|y|}|K(x-y)-K(x)|\,dx\le B\ (y\ne0),\qquad \int_{R_1<|x|<R_2}K(x)\,dx=0\ (0<R_1<R_2<\infty).∣K(x)∣≤B∣x∣−d (x=0),∫∣x∣≥2∣y∣​∣K(x−y)−K(x)∣dx≤B (y=0),∫R1​<∣x∣<R2​​K(x)dx=0 (0<R1​<R2​<∞).

Rd\mathbb{R}^dRd carries Lebesgue measure mmm, and ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p∥⋅∥p​ is the Lp(Rd)L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)Lp(Rd) norm. Let 1<p<∞1<p<\infty1<p<∞ and for f∈Lp(Rd)f\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^d)f∈Lp(Rd) and ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 put

Tεf(x)=∫∣y∣≥εf(x−y)K(y) dy.T_\varepsilon f(x)=\int_{|y|\ge\varepsilon}f(x-y)K(y)\,dy .Tε​f(x)=∫∣y∣≥ε​f(x−y)K(y)dy.

Then there is a constant ApA_pAp​, independent of fff and ε\varepsilonε, such that ∥Tεf∥p≤Ap∥f∥p\|T_\varepsilon f\|_p\le A_p\|f\|_p∥Tε​f∥p​≤Ap​∥f∥p​ for all f∈Lpf\in L^pf∈Lp and ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0. Moreover, for each f∈Lpf\in L^pf∈Lp the limit Tf=lim⁡ε→0TεfTf=\lim_{\varepsilon\to0}T_\varepsilon fTf=limε→0​Tε​f exists in the LpL^pLp norm, and ∥Tf∥p≤Ap∥f∥p\|Tf\|_p\le A_p\|f\|_p∥Tf∥p​≤Ap​∥f∥p​.

Formalization Note TεfT_\varepsilon fTε​f is the Bochner integral ∫ y in {y | ε ≤ ‖y‖}, …; for f∈Lpf\in L^pf∈Lp it converges absolutely at every xxx. The limit ε→0\varepsilon\to0ε→0 is taken along 𝓝[>] 0, and the limit operator is the function g. ENNReal.ofReal p is the exponent, so p<∞p<\inftyp<∞. The second condition on KKK is a lower Lebesgue integral ∫⁻, so it also asserts integrability. Measurability of KKK is assumed as AEStronglyMeasurable K volume. The constant A : ℝ≥0 depends on KKK and ppp (Stein: independent of fff and ε\varepsilonε).

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_DbarRegularity_Setting
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
Formal statement
namespace DbarRegularity

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal ContDiff

/-- Stein, *Singular Integrals*, Chapter II, § 3.2, Theorem 2 (p. 35): let `K` on `ℝ^d` satisfy
`|K(x)| ≤ B |x|^{-d}` for `x ≠ 0`, `∫_{|x| ≥ 2|y|} |K(x - y) - K(x)| dx ≤ B` for `y ≠ 0`
(conditions (18)), and `∫_{R₁ < |x| < R₂} K(x) dx = 0` for `0 < R₁ < R₂` (condition (19)). For
`1 < p < ∞` and `f ∈ L^p` let `T_ε f (x) = ∫_{|y| ≥ ε} f(x - y) K(y) dy`. Then
`‖T_ε f‖_p ≤ A_p ‖f‖_p` with `A_p` independent of `f` and `ε` (inequality (21)), and for each
`f ∈ L^p` the limit `T f = lim_{ε → 0} T_ε f` exists in `L^p` and also satisfies (21). -/
theorem truncatedSingularIntegral_lp {d : ℕ} (K : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) → ℂ) (B : ℝ)
    (hKm : AEStronglyMeasurable K volume)
    (hK1 : ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ‖K x‖ ≤ B / ‖x‖ ^ d)
    (hK2 : ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → ∫⁻ x in {x | 2 * ‖y‖ ≤ ‖x‖}, ‖K (x - y) - K x‖ₑ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal B)
    (hK3 : ∀ R₁ R₂ : ℝ, 0 < R₁ → R₁ < R₂ → ∫ x in {x | R₁ < ‖x‖ ∧ ‖x‖ < R₂}, K x = 0)
    (p : ℝ) (hp : 1 < p) :
    ∃ A : ℝ≥0,
      (∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∀ f : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) → ℂ, MemLp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume →
        eLpNorm (fun x => ∫ y in {y | ε ≤ ‖y‖}, f (x - y) * K y) (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume
          ≤ A * eLpNorm f (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume) ∧
      ∀ f : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) → ℂ, MemLp f (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume →
        ∃ g : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) → ℂ, MemLp g (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume ∧
          Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ => eLpNorm
              ((fun x => ∫ y in {y | ε ≤ ‖y‖}, f (x - y) * K y) - g) (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume)
            (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) ∧
          eLpNorm g (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume ≤ A * eLpNorm f (ENNReal.ofReal p) volume := by sorry

end DbarRegularity
Source
E. M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton Mathematical Series 30, Princeton University Press (1970), ISBN 0-691-08079-8, Chapter II, § 3.2, Theorem 2, p. 35
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: DbarRegularity.truncatedSingularIntegral_lp

Setting. d∈Nd\in\mathbb Nd∈N (implicit), kernel K:Rd→CK:\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb CK:Rd→C, real BBB, real p>1p>1p>1 (used as ENNReal.ofReal p ∈(1,∞)\in(1,\infty)∈(1,∞)), Lebesgue measure.

Hypotheses.

  • KKK a.e.-strongly measurable;
  • (size) ∣K(x)∣≤B/∣x∣d|K(x)|\le B/|x|^d∣K(x)∣≤B/∣x∣d for all x≠0x\ne0x=0;
  • (Hörmander) for all y≠0y\ne0y=0: ∫{x: 2∣y∣≤∣x∣}−∣K(x−y)−K(x)∣ dx≤max⁡(B,0)\int^-_{\{x:\,2|y|\le|x|\}}|K(x-y)-K(x)|\,dx\le\max(B,0)∫{x:2∣y∣≤∣x∣}−​∣K(x−y)−K(x)∣dx≤max(B,0) (lower integral, so a true [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞] value);
  • (cancellation) for all 0<R1<R20<R_1<R_20<R1​<R2​: ∫{R1<∣x∣<R2}K(x) dx=0\int_{\{R_1<|x|<R_2\}}K(x)\,dx=0∫{R1​<∣x∣<R2​}​K(x)dx=0 (Bochner);
  • p>1p>1p>1.

Definitions used. MemLp, eLpNorm, Bochner set integral, Tendsto … (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) in [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞]. Write Tεf(x)=∫{∣y∣≥ε}f(x−y)K(y) dyT_\varepsilon f(x)=\int_{\{|y|\ge\varepsilon\}}f(x-y)K(y)\,dyTε​f(x)=∫{∣y∣≥ε}​f(x−y)K(y)dy.

Conclusion. ∃A∈[0,∞)\exists A\in[0,\infty)∃A∈[0,∞) such that (i) ∀ε>0 ∀f∈Lp: ∥Tεf∥p≤A∥f∥p\forall\varepsilon>0\ \forall f\in L^p:\ \|T_\varepsilon f\|_p\le A\|f\|_p∀ε>0 ∀f∈Lp: ∥Tε​f∥p​≤A∥f∥p​; and (ii) ∀f∈Lp ∃g∈Lp\forall f\in L^p\ \exists g\in L^p∀f∈Lp ∃g∈Lp with ∥Tεf−g∥p→0\|T_\varepsilon f-g\|_p\to0∥Tε​f−g∥p​→0 as ε→0+\varepsilon\to0^+ε→0+ and ∥g∥p≤A∥f∥p\|g\|_p\le A\|f\|_p∥g∥p​≤A∥f∥p​.

Quantifier order: K,B,d,pK,B,d,pK,B,d,p (and hypotheses) →\to→ AAA →\to→ ε\varepsilonε, fff →\to→ ggg. So AAA is uniform in ε\varepsilonε and fff (it may depend on KKK; Stein's dependence only on p,B,dp,B,dp,B,d is stronger, but the weaker form is still the standard content).

Degenerate cases. B<0B<0B<0, d≥1d\ge1d≥1: the size bound is impossible, so the statement is vacuous (harmless). d=0d=0d=0: the space is the point {0}\{0\}{0}; the size and Hörmander hypotheses are vacuous, the annulus {R1<0<R2}\{R_1<0<R_2\}{R1​<0<R2​} is empty so cancellation holds; {∣y∣≥ε}=∅\{|y|\ge\varepsilon\}=\emptyset{∣y∣≥ε}=∅, so Tεf=0T_\varepsilon f=0Tε​f=0, and (i),(ii) hold with g=0g=0g=0. Harmless and true.

Remarks. For d≥1d\ge1d≥1, ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0: ∣K∣1∣y∣≥ε≤B∣y∣−d1∣y∣≥ε∈Lp′|K|\mathbf 1_{|y|\ge\varepsilon}\le B|y|^{-d}\mathbf 1_{|y|\ge\varepsilon}\in L^{p'}∣K∣1∣y∣≥ε​≤B∣y∣−d1∣y∣≥ε​∈Lp′ (p′<∞p'<\inftyp′<∞, dp′>ddp'>ddp′>d), so by Hölder y↦f(x−y)K(y)y\mapsto f(x-y)K(y)y↦f(x−y)K(y) is integrable on {∣y∣≥ε}\{|y|\ge\varepsilon\}{∣y∣≥ε} for every xxx: the Bochner integral is genuine, no junk. On annuli KKK is bounded and the annulus has finite measure, so the cancellation integral is genuine. The Hörmander set includes only xxx with ∣x∣≥2∣y∣>0|x|\ge2|y|>0∣x∣≥2∣y∣>0, so x≠0≠x−yx\ne0\ne x-yx=0=x−y.

Soundness checks.

  1. Bochner junk: none (shown above for both integrals). ENNReal.ofReal B =0=0=0 for B<0B<0B<0 is consistent with the vacuous case. ofReal p with p>1p>1p>1 is a genuine exponent; p=∞p=\inftyp=∞ excluded. Real division by ∥x∥d\|x\|^d∥x∥d only for x≠0x\ne0x=0. AAA is ℝ≥0, so finite. Hypotheses satisfiable for B≥0B\ge0B≥0 (e.g. K=0K=0K=0; or Riesz kernels xj/∣x∣d+1x_j/|x|^{d+1}xj​/∣x∣d+1 with BBB large); conclusion non-trivial.
  2. AAA chosen before ε\varepsilonε and fff: uniform bound as in Stein Ch. II Thm 2, inequality (21); existence of the LpL^pLp limit as ε→0+\varepsilon\to0^+ε→0+ with the same bound is the second part of that theorem. Plausibly TRUE as written.

Verdict: no mis-formalization observed

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 13, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 13, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me