Isotropic correspondence and complete-positive realization
OpenQAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P43.isotropic_correspondenceAll operators act on a finite bipartite space in a fixed product basis. Write for Bob's partial transpose and , where . A density operator is positive semidefinite with complex trace exactly one. An admissible PPT map is complex-linear, positive and trace preserving, and is positive on every positive operator. A PPT channel is additionally completely positive; complete positivity of the transpose-conjugated map is not required. Fidelity means the overlap .
Let and . For a Hermitian operator satisfying and , construct and
This construction gives a one-to-one correspondence between these operators and admissible PPT maps of the two-coefficient isotropic form. The maps are channels and obey for every density operator . More generally, every positive complex-linear map of this isotropic form, even before imposing trace preservation, is completely positive.
This identifies the exact admissible witness operators with realizable channels.
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P43
noncomputable section
open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P43
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P04
(gamma copies bellProjector negativeProjector werner)
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P30 (IsPositiveMap)
/-- PDF p.2, discussion after Lemma 1, (3)–(5): exact one-to-one correspondence,
with B=(I-A)/(m^2-1), and complete positivity of positive maps of isotropic form.
The fidelity is an overlap, not root fidelity. -/
theorem isotropic_correspondence (d m : ℕ) (hd : 0 < d) (hm : 2 ≤ m) :
(∀ T : Matrix (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d) ℂ →ₗ[ℂ]
Matrix (Fin m × Fin m) (Fin m × Fin m) ℂ,
(IsPPTMap T ∧ HasIsotropicForm T) ↔
∃! A : Matrix (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d) ℂ,
RainsFeasibleEffect m A ∧ isotropicPreparation m A = T) ∧
(∀ A B : Matrix (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d) ℂ,
IsPositiveMap (isotropicRaw m A B) →
Entanglement.IsCompletelyPositive (isotropicRaw m A B)) ∧
(∀ A : Matrix (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d) ℂ, RainsFeasibleEffect m A →
IsPositiveConjugatePPTChannel (isotropicPreparation m A) ∧
∀ rho : Matrix (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d) ℂ,
IsDensityMatrix rho → effectProb (bellProjector m) (isotropicPreparation m A rho) = effectProb A rho) := by sorry
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P43
end
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol
For every pair of natural numbers and , index the input matrices by and the output matrices by . On either space define , and let have entry when both row and column pairs have equal components, and entry zero otherwise. Write
Call feasible when and , , , and are all positive semidefinite. For every complex-linear map between these matrix spaces, the conjunction that sends positive semidefinite matrices to positive semidefinite matrices, preserves the trace of every matrix, satisfies for every , and equals for some input matrices , is equivalent to the existence of exactly one feasible input matrix such that . Moreover, for every pair of arbitrary complex input matrices , positivity of implies its complete positivity. Finally, every feasible gives a map that is positive, trace preserving, completely positive, and satisfies for every ; for every positive semidefinite input matrix with ,
Here complete positivity means that, for every natural number , including , applying the map to each matrix block of any positive semidefinite matrix indexed by an -element auxiliary index and the input index produces a positive semidefinite matrix.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.