Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

A non-zero combination of the monomials z^τ e^{⟨t·x, z⟩} has a non-zero derivative at the origin

Proved
Transcendence.exp_monomials_ne_zero

by carlok · Oct 2, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leannumber-theorytranscendence

Let x1,…,xd1∈Cιx_1, \dots, x_{d_1} \in \mathbb{C}^\iotax1​,…,xd1​​∈Cι be linearly independent over Q\mathbb{Q}Q, let k0∈ιk_0 \in \iotak0​∈ι, and let pτ,tp_{\tau,t}pτ,t​ (0≤τ≤T00 \le \tau \le T_00≤τ≤T0​, t∈{0,…,T1}d1t \in \{0, \dots, T_1\}^{d_1}t∈{0,…,T1​}d1​) be complex numbers, not all zero. Then the entire function

F(z)=∑τ,tpτ,t zk0τexp⁡(∑ν(∑itixiν)zν)F(z) = \sum_{\tau, t} p_{\tau,t}\, z_{k_0}^{\tau} \exp\Bigl(\sum_\nu \bigl(\textstyle\sum_i t_i x_{i\nu}\bigr) z_\nu\Bigr)F(z)=τ,t∑​pτ,t​zk0​τ​exp(ν∑​(∑i​ti​xiν​)zν​)

has a non-zero derivative of some order at the origin; in particular FFF is not identically zero. The frequencies ∑itixi\sum_i t_i x_i∑i​ti​xi​ are distinct for distinct ttt; restricted to a suitable line, FFF becomes a one-variable exponential polynomial with distinct exponents, which is not identically zero by FourExp.expPoly_ne_zero.

It is one step of the proof of Baker's theorem formalised in this mission, which follows Chapter 4 of Waldschmidt's book: Baker's theorem from the criterion of Schneider–Lang for Cartesian products, as observed by Bertrand and Masser (1980).

Novelty. None: the non-vanishing that §4.6 of the book uses (Exercises 2.4–2.5, p. 60). The contribution of this node is the formal proof.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace Transcendence

/-- **Non-vanishing of exponential polynomials in several variables** (Waldschmidt, *Diophantine Approximation on
Linear Algebraic Groups*, §4.6 step 3; cf. Exercises 2.4–2.5). Let `x₁, …, x_{d₁} ∈ ℂ^ι` be linearly independent
over `ℚ`, and let `k₀ ∈ ι`. For a non-zero family of complex coefficients `p_{τ,t}` (`0 ≤ τ ≤ T₀`,
`t ∈ {0, …, T₁}^{d₁}`), the entire function `F(z) = Σ p_{τ,t} · z_{k₀}^τ · exp(⟨t₁x₁ + ⋯ + t_{d₁}x_{d₁}, z⟩)` has a
non-zero derivative of some order at the origin. (Proof: the frequencies `Σ tᵢxᵢ` are pairwise distinct; restrict
`F` to a generic line through `0` and use the one-variable statement `FourExp.expPoly_ne_zero`.) -/
theorem exp_monomials_ne_zero {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {d₁ : ℕ} (x : Fin d₁ → ι → ℂ)
    (hx : LinearIndependent ℚ x) (k₀ : ι) {T₀ T₁ : ℕ}
    (p : Fin (T₀ + 1) × (Fin d₁ → Fin (T₁ + 1)) → ℂ) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
    ∃ k : ℕ, iteratedFDeriv ℂ k (fun z : ι → ℂ => ∑ l, p l * (z k₀ ^ (l.1 : ℕ) *
      Complex.exp (∑ ν, (∑ i, ((l.2 i : ℕ) : ℂ) * x i ν) * z ν))) 0 ≠ 0 := by
  sorry

end Transcendence
Source
M. Waldschmidt, Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups, Grundlehren 326, Springer, 2000, Exercises 2.4–2.5 (p. 60), in the form used in §4.6. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 2 October 2026 (C. Perassi).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me