lean_workbook_plus_317
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Given , prove by induction that for all .
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_317 (j : ℕ → ℤ) (j_1 : j 0 = -2014) (h : ∀ n, j (n + 1) = 2 * j n) : ∀ n, j n = -1007 * 2 ^ n := by sorry
The source initial index1 was shifted to0 without adjusting the formula.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
With j₀=−2014 and j_(n+1)=2j_n prove j_n=−2014·2^n. Alternatively use j₁=−2014 and conclude−1007·2^n for n≥1.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_317 (j : ℕ → ℤ) (j_1 : j 0 = -2014) (h : ∀ n, j (n + 1) = 2 * j n) : ∀ n, j n = -1007 * 2 ^ n := by sorry