Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 14: depolarizing quantum and private capacities through the leading quadratic-log correction

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50.depolarizing_capacities_expansion

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All systems are nonzero finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces. A channel is complex-linear, completely positive and trace preserving. Its receiver and full complementary channel are obtained from the same isometric dilation. Write Q(N)Q(N)Q(N) and P(N)P(N)P(N) for the unassisted operational quantum and private capacities, allowing arbitrary collective codes over independent uses with vanishing reliability error and environmental leakage. Write Ic(N)=max⁡ρ[S(N(ρ))−S(Nc(ρ))]I_c(N)=\max_\rho[S(N(\rho))-S(N^c(\rho))]Ic​(N)=maxρ​[S(N(ρ))−S(Nc(ρ))], where the maximum includes every density operator. Entropies and logarithms are in bits, with 0log⁡0=00\log 0=00log0=0. The diamond norm has no factor 1/21/21/2.

Let Dp(ρ)=(1−p)ρ+p3(XρX+YρY+ZρZ)D_p(\rho)=(1-p)\rho+\frac p3(X\rho X+Y\rho Y+Z\rho Z)Dp​(ρ)=(1−p)ρ+3p​(XρX+YρY+ZρZ) and set b(p)=1−h(p)−plog⁡23b(p)=1-h(p)-p\log_2 3b(p)=1−h(p)−plog2​3, where hhh is binary entropy in bits. There exist KQ,KP≥0K_Q,K_P\ge0KQ​,KP​≥0 and 0<δ≤10<\delta\le10<δ≤1 such that for every 0<p<δ0<p<\delta0<p<δ,

b(p)≤Q(Dp)≤b(p)−169(6+2)p2log⁡2p+KQp2,b(p)\le Q(D_p)\le b(p)-\frac{16}{9}(6+\sqrt2)p^2\log_2p+K_Qp^2,b(p)≤Q(Dp​)≤b(p)−916​(6+2​)p2log2​p+KQ​p2, b(p)≤P(Dp)≤b(p)−163(6+2)p2log⁡2p+KPp2.b(p)\le P(D_p)\le b(p)-\frac{16}{3}(6+\sqrt2)p^2\log_2p+K_Pp^2.b(p)≤P(Dp​)≤b(p)−316​(6+2​)p2log2​p+KP​p2.

Both lower and upper bounds are retained. The displayed hashing expression is used only in the low-noise regime.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P50
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50

variable {A B E F : Type}

variable [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] [Fintype B] [DecidableEq B]

variable [Fintype E] [DecidableEq E] [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F]

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P67
  (IsIsometry receiverChannel complementaryChannel maximumCoherentInformation
    dilationPower idealJoint)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P80 (log2)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P69 (diamond choi)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P07 (fullTracePrivateCapacity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier18.P17 (clock)

/-- Theorem 14, PDF p.15: both lower and upper bounds for both operational
capacities, with the factor-three private/quantum leading correction. -/
theorem depolarizing_capacities_expansion :
    ∃ Kq Kp : ℝ, 0 ≤ Kq ∧ 0 ≤ Kp ∧ ∃ delta : ℝ, 0 < delta ∧ delta ≤ 1 ∧
      ∀ p ∈ Set.Ioo 0 delta,
        (depolarizingHashing p ≤ dilationQuantumCapacity (depolarizingDilation p) ∧
          dilationQuantumCapacity (depolarizingDilation p) ≤ depolarizingHashing p -
            (16 / 9 : ℝ) * (6 + Real.sqrt 2) * p ^ 2 * log2 p + Kq * p ^ 2) ∧
        (depolarizingHashing p ≤ fullTracePrivateCapacity (depolarizingDilation p) ∧
          fullTracePrivateCapacity (depolarizingDilation p) ≤ depolarizingHashing p -
            (16 / 3 : ℝ) * (6 + Real.sqrt 2) * p ^ 2 * log2 p + Kp * p ^ 2) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50

end
Source
Quantum and private capacities of low-noise channels, arXiv:1705.04335v3, PDF p. 15, Theorem 14: depolarizing quantum and private capacities through the leading quadratic-log correction
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For 0<p<10<p<10<p<1, let Vp:C2→C2⊗C4V_p:\mathbb C^2\to\mathbb C^2\otimes\mathbb C^4Vp​:C2→C2⊗C4 have entries (Vp)b,j;a=wj(p)(σj)ba(V_p)_{b,j;a}=\sqrt{w_j(p)}(\sigma_j)_{ba}(Vp​)b,j;a​=wj​(p)​(σj​)ba​, where w(p)=(1−p,p/3,p/3,p/3)w(p)=(1-p,p/3,p/3,p/3)w(p)=(1−p,p/3,p/3,p/3) and (σ0,σ1,σ2,σ3)(\sigma_0,\sigma_1,\sigma_2,\sigma_3)(σ0​,σ1​,σ2​,σ3​) are respectively the identity and the usual Pauli X,Y,ZX,Y,ZX,Y,Z matrices. Write Np(X)=Tr⁡E(VpXVp†)N_p(X)=\operatorname{Tr}_{E}(V_pXV_p^\dagger)Np​(X)=TrE​(Vp​XVp†​), log⁡2x=log⁡x/log⁡2\log_2x=\log x/\log2log2​x=logx/log2, h2(p)=[−plog⁡p−(1−p)log⁡(1−p)]/log⁡2h_2(p)=[-p\log p-(1-p)\log(1-p)]/\log2h2​(p)=[−plogp−(1−p)log(1−p)]/log2, and H(p)=1−h2(p)−plog⁡23H(p)=1-h_2(p)-p\log_2 3H(p)=1−h2​(p)−plog2​3. Define Q(Vp)Q(V_p)Q(Vp​) as the supremum of nonnegative rates rrr for which there is, for every integer n≥0n\ge0n≥0, a positive integer MnM_nMn​ and encoding and decoding channels through Np⊗nN_p^{\otimes n}Np⊗n​, such that their entanglement transmission fidelities tend to 111 and, for every s>0s>0s>0, eventually r−s≤log⁡2Mn/nr-s\le\log_2M_n/nr−s≤log2​Mn​/n. The fidelity is

Re⁡Tr⁡ ⁣[∣ΦMn⟩⟨ΦMn∣(id⁡⊗Decn∘Np⊗n∘Encn)(∣ΦMn⟩⟨ΦMn∣)],∣ΦM⟩=M−1/2∑m=0M−1∣m,m⟩.\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}\!\left[ |\Phi_{M_n}\rangle\langle\Phi_{M_n}| (\operatorname{id}\otimes\mathrm{Dec}_n\circ N_p^{\otimes n}\circ\mathrm{Enc}_n) (|\Phi_{M_n}\rangle\langle\Phi_{M_n}|)\right], \quad |\Phi_M\rangle=M^{-1/2}\sum_{m=0}^{M-1}|m,m\rangle.ReTr[∣ΦMn​​⟩⟨ΦMn​​∣(id⊗Decn​∘Np⊗n​∘Encn​)(∣ΦMn​​⟩⟨ΦMn​​∣)],∣ΦM​⟩=M−1/2m=0∑M−1​∣m,m⟩.

Here and below a channel is a finite Kraus sum with ∑jKj†Kj=I\sum_jK_j^\dagger K_j=I∑j​Kj†​Kj​=I. Define P(Vp)P(V_p)P(Vp​) as the supremum of nonnegative rates rrr such that, for every ϵ,s>0\epsilon,s>0ϵ,s>0, all sufficiently large positive nnn admit M>0M>0M>0, input density matrices ρm\rho_mρm​, and positive semidefinite decoding matrices FjF_jFj​ summing to III, with r−s≤log⁡2M/nr-s\le\log_2M/nr−s≤log2​M/n and

∥Ω−1M∑m∣m,m⟩⟨m,m∣⊗ΩE∥1<ϵ,Ω=1M∑m,j∣m,j⟩⟨m,j∣⊗Tr⁡Bn ⁣[(Fj⊗I)Vp⊗nρm(Vp⊗n)†],ΩE=Tr⁡m,jΩ.\left\|\Omega-\frac1M\sum_m|m,m\rangle\langle m,m|\otimes\Omega_E\right\|_1<\epsilon, \quad \Omega=\frac1M\sum_{m,j}|m,j\rangle\langle m,j| \otimes\operatorname{Tr}_{B^n}\!\left[(F_j\otimes I)V_p^{\otimes n}\rho_m(V_p^{\otimes n})^\dagger\right], \quad \Omega_E=\operatorname{Tr}_{m,j}\Omega .​Ω−M1​m∑​∣m,m⟩⟨m,m∣⊗ΩE​​1​<ϵ,Ω=M1​m,j∑​∣m,j⟩⟨m,j∣⊗TrBn​[(Fj​⊗I)Vp⊗n​ρm​(Vp⊗n​)†],ΩE​=Trm,j​Ω.

A density matrix is positive semidefinite with trace 111, and ∥X∥1=Re⁡Tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=ReTrX†X​; the private error uses this full trace norm. There exist real Kq,Kp≥0K_q,K_p\ge0Kq​,Kp​≥0 and 0<δ≤10<\delta\le10<δ≤1 such that every 0<p<δ0<p<\delta0<p<δ satisfies

H(p)≤Q(Vp)≤H(p)−169(6+2)p2log⁡2p+Kqp2,H(p)≤P(Vp)≤H(p)−163(6+2)p2log⁡2p+Kpp2.H(p)\le Q(V_p)\le H(p)-\frac{16}{9}(6+\sqrt2)p^2\log_2p+K_qp^2, \qquad H(p)\le P(V_p)\le H(p)-\frac{16}{3}(6+\sqrt2)p^2\log_2p+K_pp^2.H(p)≤Q(Vp​)≤H(p)−916​(6+2​)p2log2​p+Kq​p2,H(p)≤P(Vp​)≤H(p)−316​(6+2​)p2log2​p+Kp​p2.

The quantum code sequence includes a zeroth block, although its limiting rate condition concerns large nnn; real division by zero at that block is interpreted as 000.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me