Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Fast planes missing their asymptotic orbit project to proper embeddings

Open
FiniteEnergyPlane.isProperEmbedding_proj_of_isFastPlane

by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesfredholm-theorypseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. Let P=(x,T)P=(x,T)P=(x,T) be a periodic Reeb orbit and uuu a fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞ whose SSS-component proj∘u\mathrm{proj}\circ uproj∘u does not meet x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R). Then proj∘u:C→S∖x(R)\mathrm{proj}\circ u:\mathbb{C}\to S\setminus x(\mathbb{R})proj∘u:C→S∖x(R) is a proper embedding.

Formalization Note The puncture at ∞\infty∞ is IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1 (nondegenerate in the sense of Hryniewicz 2014, Definition 2.9); "fast" is IsFastPlane, "embedded" is IsEmbeddedPlane. "Proper embedding of C\mathbb{C}C into S∖x(R)S\setminus x(\mathbb{R})S∖x(R)" is stated as: proj∘u\mathrm{proj}\circ uproj∘u is injective, its derivative is injective at every point, and (proj∘u)−1(K)(\mathrm{proj}\circ u)^{-1}(K)(proj∘u)−1(K) is bounded for every compact K⊂R4K\subset\mathbb{R}^4K⊂R4 disjoint from x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R). The plane uuu is not assumed to be embedded.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Lemma 6.22. Let `u` be a fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to
`P` at `∞` whose `S`-component `proj H ∘ u` does not meet `x(ℝ)`. Then `proj H ∘ u` is a proper
embedding of `ℂ` into `S \ x(ℝ)`: it is injective, its derivative is injective at every point, and
the preimage of every compact set disjoint from `x(ℝ)` is bounded. -/
theorem isProperEmbedding_proj_of_isFastPlane (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (P : ReebOrbit H) (u : ℂ → V 1) (hu : IsFastPlane H J u)
    (huP : IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1) (hmiss : ∀ z, proj H (u z) ∉ Set.range P.x) :
    Function.Injective (proj H ∘ u) ∧
      (∀ z, Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ (proj H ∘ u) z)) ∧
      ∀ K : Set (V 1), IsCompact K → Disjoint K (Set.range P.x) →
        Bornology.IsBounded ((proj H ∘ u) ⁻¹' K) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Lemma 6.22; H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, E. Zehnder, Properties of pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectisations II: Embedding controls and algebraic invariants, Geom. Funct. Anal. 5 (1995), 270–328, doi:10.1007/BF01895669, Theorem 2.3
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

FiniteEnergyPlane.isProperEmbedding_proj_of_isFastPlane

Statement. Let H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R be a Hamiltonian with strictly star-shaped level S={H=1}S=\{H=1\}S={H=1}, let JJJ be a compatible structure on ξ\xiξ, let PPP be a Reeb orbit of HHH with image P\mathcal{P}P, and let u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 be a map such that

  • uuu is a fast plane for (H,J)(H,J)(H,J);
  • uuu has a nondegenerate end at infinity at PPP, i.e. NE(u,P)\mathrm{NE}(u,P)NE(u,P);
  • pr(u(z))∉P\mathrm{pr}(u(z))\notin\mathcal{P}pr(u(z))∈/P for every z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}z∈C.

Then the map pr∘u:C→R4\mathrm{pr}\circ u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4pr∘u:C→R4 satisfies all three of:

  1. pr∘u\mathrm{pr}\circ upr∘u is injective;
  2. for every z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}z∈C, the real-linear map D(pr∘u)(z):C→R4D(\mathrm{pr}\circ u)(z):\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4D(pr∘u)(z):C→R4 is injective;
  3. for every compact K⊂R4K\subset\mathbb{R}^4K⊂R4 with K∩P=∅K\cap\mathcal{P}=\emptysetK∩P=∅, the preimage (pr∘u)−1(K)⊂C(\mathrm{pr}\circ u)^{-1}(K)\subset\mathbb{C}(pr∘u)−1(K)⊂C is bounded.

The compact set KKK in item 3 is any compact subset of R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 disjoint from P\mathcal{P}P; it is not required to lie in SSS (the preimage only depends on K∩pr(u(C))K\cap\mathrm{pr}(u(\mathbb{C}))K∩pr(u(C))). PPP is not assumed prime, and no Conley–Zehnder bound on PPP and no embeddedness of uuu is assumed. The prime orbit in the definition of "fast plane" is existentially quantified and is not stated to equal PPP. The conclusion does not assert continuity of the inverse or any statement about the closure of the image beyond item 3.

Meaning of every symbol used above

Ambient space and linear structures. R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 has coordinates y=(y0,y1,y2,y3)y=(y_0,y_1,y_2,y_3)y=(y0​,y1​,y2​,y3​). The fixed linear maps and forms are

j0(v)=(−v1,  v0,  −v3,  v2),ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2,λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v),j_0(v)=(-v_1,\;v_0,\;-v_3,\;v_2),\qquad \omega_0(u,v)=\langle j_0u,v\rangle=u_0v_1-u_1v_0+u_2v_3-u_3v_2,\qquad \lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\,\omega_0(x,v),j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​),ω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​,λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v),

where ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle⟨⋅,⋅⟩ is the Euclidean dot product.

The Hamiltonian HHH (hypothesis "strictly star-shaped level"). H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every y≠0y\neq 0y=0 there is exactly one r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x)>0dHx​(x)>0 at every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1. Write S={H=1}S=\{H=1\}S={H=1}. Nothing is assumed about H(0)H(0)H(0). Further notation:

  • ∇H(x)\nabla H(x)∇H(x) is the vector of partial derivatives, XH(x)=j0∇H(x)X_H(x)=j_0\nabla H(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x);
  • the Reeb field is R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1 XH(x)R(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}\,X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x), with the convention 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0 (so R(x)=0R(x)=0R(x)=0 wherever λx(XH(x))=0\lambda_x(X_H(x))=0λx​(XH​(x))=0);
  • ξx={v∈R4: λx(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0}\xi_x=\{v\in\mathbb{R}^4:\ \lambda_x(v)=0 \text{ and } dH_x(v)=0\}ξx​={v∈R4: λx​(v)=0 and dHx​(v)=0}.

The structure JJJ (hypothesis "compatible on ξ\xiξ"). J:R4→EndR(R4)J:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathbb{R}^4)J:R4→EndR​(R4) is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every x∈Sx\in Sx∈S and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​:

Jxv∈ξx,JxJxv=−v,v≠0⇒ω0(v,Jxv)>0,ω0(Jxv,Jxw)=ω0(v,w).J_xv\in\xi_x,\qquad J_xJ_xv=-v,\qquad v\neq0\Rightarrow \omega_0(v,J_xv)>0,\qquad \omega_0(J_xv,J_xw)=\omega_0(v,w).Jx​v∈ξx​,Jx​Jx​v=−v,v=0⇒ω0​(v,Jx​v)>0,ω0​(Jx​v,Jx​w)=ω0​(v,w).

No condition is imposed on JxJ_xJx​ outside ξx\xi_xξx​, nor for x∉Sx\notin Sx∈/S.

Radial coordinates. For y∈R4y\in\mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 let σ(y)\sigma(y)σ(y) be a (chosen) r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if such an rrr exists, and σ(y)=1\sigma(y)=1σ(y)=1 otherwise; for y≠0y\neq0y=0 this rrr is the unique one from the star-shapedness hypothesis. Put

pr(y)=σ(y) y,a(y)=−12log⁡σ(y).\mathrm{pr}(y)=\sigma(y)\,y,\qquad a(y)=-\tfrac12\log\sigma(y).pr(y)=σ(y)y,a(y)=−21​logσ(y).

For y≠0y\neq0y=0, pr(y)\mathrm{pr}(y)pr(y) is the point of SSS on the ray through yyy and y=e2a(y) pr(y)y=e^{2a(y)}\,\mathrm{pr}(y)y=e2a(y)pr(y); always pr(0)=0\mathrm{pr}(0)=0pr(0)=0.

The Reeb orbit PPP. PPP consists of a map xP:R→R4x_P:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4xP​:R→R4 and a number TP>0T_P>0TP​>0 such that xP(τ)∈Sx_P(\tau)\in SxP​(τ)∈S, xP′(τ)=R(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau)=R(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=R(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau+T_P)=x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ. The period TPT_PTP​ is not required to be the minimal period. Its image is P=xP(R)⊂R4\mathcal{P}=x_P(\mathbb{R})\subset\mathbb{R}^4P=xP​(R)⊂R4. A Reeb orbit QQQ is called prime if xQ(τ)≠xQ(0)x_Q(\tau)\neq x_Q(0)xQ​(τ)=xQ​(0) for all 0<τ<TQ0<\tau<T_Q0<τ<TQ​.

The almost complex structure J~\tilde JJ~ on R4\mathbb{R}^4R4. For y∈R4y\in\mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 let x=pr(y)x=\mathrm{pr}(y)x=pr(y), r=σ(y)r=\sigma(y)r=σ(y), and define the linear forms α(v)=r dHx(v)2 dHx(x)\alpha(v)=\dfrac{r\,dH_x(v)}{2\,dH_x(x)}α(v)=2dHx​(x)rdHx​(v)​ and β(v)=r λx(v)\beta(v)=r\,\lambda_x(v)β(v)=rλx​(v) (division by 000 gives 000). Then

J~(y)v=α(v) r−1R(x)−β(v) 2y+Jx ⁣(v−α(v) 2y−β(v) r−1R(x)).\tilde J(y)v=\alpha(v)\,r^{-1}R(x)-\beta(v)\,2y+J_x\!\big(v-\alpha(v)\,2y-\beta(v)\,r^{-1}R(x)\big).J~(y)v=α(v)r−1R(x)−β(v)2y+Jx​(v−α(v)2y−β(v)r−1R(x)).

Plane coordinates. For f:C→Ff:\mathbb{C}\to Ff:C→F and z=s+itz=s+itz=s+it, ∂sf(z)=Df(z) 1\partial_sf(z)=Df(z)\,1∂s​f(z)=Df(z)1 and ∂tf(z)=Df(z) i\partial_tf(z)=Df(z)\,i∂t​f(z)=Df(z)i, where Df(z)Df(z)Df(z) is the real derivative (taken to be 000 where fff is not differentiable). For a map u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 write au=a∘ua_u=a\circ uau​=a∘u and wu=pr∘uw_u=\mathrm{pr}\circ uwu​=pr∘u.

Finite-energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C. uuu is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on C\mathbb{C}C; u(z)≠0u(z)\neq0u(z)=0 for every zzz; at every zzz, uuu is differentiable and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z)) ∂tu(z)=0\partial_su(z)+\tilde J(u(z))\,\partial_tu(z)=0∂s​u(z)+J~(u(z))∂t​u(z)=0; and E(u)<∞E(u)<\inftyE(u)<∞, where

E(u)=sup⁡φ∫Cmax⁡ ⁣(0, eφ(z)) dz∈[0,∞],E(u)=\sup_{\varphi}\int_{\mathbb{C}}\max\!\big(0,\,e_\varphi(z)\big)\,dz\in[0,\infty],E(u)=φsup​∫C​max(0,eφ​(z))dz∈[0,∞], eφ=φ′(au)(∂sau λwu(∂twu)−∂tau λwu(∂swu))+φ(au) ω0(∂swu,∂twu),e_\varphi=\varphi'(a_u)\big(\partial_sa_u\,\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_tw_u)-\partial_ta_u\,\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_sw_u)\big)+\varphi(a_u)\,\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u),eφ​=φ′(au​)(∂s​au​λwu​​(∂t​wu​)−∂t​au​λwu​​(∂s​wu​))+φ(au​)ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​),

the supremum ranging over all C∞C^\inftyC∞, nondecreasing φ:R→[0,1]\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]φ:R→[0,1] (the integral is the Lebesgue integral of the nonnegative part).

Nondegenerate end at infinity at an orbit QQQ (written NE(u,Q)\mathrm{NE}(u,Q)NE(u,Q)). With c∞(s,t)=e2πse2πitc_\infty(s,t)=e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi it}c∞​(s,t)=e2πse2πit, there exist d,c∈Rd,c\in\mathbb{R}d,c∈R and b>0b>0b>0 such that, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞, uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R,

a(u(c∞(s,t)))−TQ s−d  →  0,ebs ∥pr(u(c∞(s,t)))−xQ(TQt+c)∥  →  0.a\big(u(c_\infty(s,t))\big)-T_Q\,s-d\;\to\;0,\qquad e^{bs}\,\Big\|\mathrm{pr}\big(u(c_\infty(s,t))\big)-x_Q(T_Qt+c)\Big\|\;\to\;0 .a(u(c∞​(s,t)))−TQ​s−d→0,ebs​pr(u(c∞​(s,t)))−xQ​(TQ​t+c)​→0.

("Uniformly" means: for every ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 there is s0s_0s0​ with the quantity at most ε\varepsilonε in absolute value/norm for all s≥s0s\ge s_0s≥s0​ and all ttt.)

The function π∂s\pi\partial_sπ∂s​. For x∈R4x\in\mathbb{R}^4x∈R4 define e1(x)=∣x∣−1(q2(x)−dHx(q2(x))dHx(x)x)e_1(x)=|x|^{-1}\big(q_2(x)-\tfrac{dH_x(q_2(x))}{dH_x(x)}x\big)e1​(x)=∣x∣−1(q2​(x)−dHx​(x)dHx​(q2​(x))​x) and e2(x)=∣x∣−1(q1(x)−dHx(q1(x))dHx(x)x)e_2(x)=|x|^{-1}\big(q_1(x)-\tfrac{dH_x(q_1(x))}{dH_x(x)}x\big)e2​(x)=∣x∣−1(q1​(x)−dHx​(x)dHx​(q1​(x))​x) with q1(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)q_1(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)q1​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), q2(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)q_2(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)q2​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​) and ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm (again 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0), and the complex coordinate ζx(v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+i ω0(e1(x),v)∈C\zeta_x(v)=\omega_0(v,e_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(e_1(x),v)\in\mathbb{C}ζx​(v)=ω0​(v,e2​(x))+iω0​(e1​(x),v)∈C. Then

π∂su(z)=ζwu(z)(∂swu(z)−λwu(z)(∂swu(z)) R(wu(z)))∈C.\pi\partial_s u(z)=\zeta_{w_u(z)}\Big(\partial_sw_u(z)-\lambda_{w_u(z)}\big(\partial_sw_u(z)\big)\,R\big(w_u(z)\big)\Big)\in\mathbb{C}.π∂s​u(z)=ζwu​(z)​(∂s​wu​(z)−λwu​(z)​(∂s​wu​(z))R(wu​(z)))∈C.

Winding of a loop. A map f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C has winding k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z}k∈Z if fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}θ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t)f(t)=|f(t)|e^{i\theta(t)}f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all ttt and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1)-\theta(0)=2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.

Fast plane. u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 is a fast plane if all three hold:

  1. uuu is a finite-energy curve on C\mathbb{C}C;
  2. there exists some prime Reeb orbit QQQ (not necessarily equal to PPP) with NE(u,Q)\mathrm{NE}(u,Q)NE(u,Q);
  3. the zero set Z={z∈C:π∂su(z)=0}Z=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\pi\partial_su(z)=0\}Z={z∈C:π∂s​u(z)=0} is finite, and there are integers kzk_zkz​ (z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z) with ∑z∈Zkz=0\sum_{z\in Z}k_z=0∑z∈Z​kz​=0 such that for each z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z there is r>0r>0r>0 with π∂su≠0\pi\partial_su\neq0π∂s​u=0 on the closed disc B‾(z,r)\overline{B}(z,r)B(z,r) minus zzz, and for every ρ∈(0,r)\rho\in(0,r)ρ∈(0,r) the loop t↦π∂su(z+ρe2πit)t\mapsto\pi\partial_su(z+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦π∂s​u(z+ρe2πit) has winding kzk_zkz​. (If ZZZ is empty this condition holds automatically.)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me