Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Relatively compact symmetric perturbations: Kato–Rellich plus Weyl

Open
TeschlQM.OneParticle.relativelyCompact_perturbation

by Gabewhigham · Oct 7, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

mathematical-physicsschrodinger-operatorsspectral-theory

Let H\mathfrak HH be a complex Hilbert space, let AAA be self-adjoint and bounded from below, and let KKK be symmetric and relatively compact with respect to AAA. Then:

  • D(A+K)=D(A)\mathfrak D(A+K)=\mathfrak D(A)D(A+K)=D(A);
  • A+KA+KA+K is self-adjoint and bounded from below;
  • σess(A+K)=σess(A)\sigma_{ess}(A+K)=\sigma_{ess}(A)σess​(A+K)=σess​(A);
  • every core of AAA is a core of A+KA+KA+K.

Proof outline: a relatively compact KKK has AAA-bound 000 (Lemma 6.22). Kato–Rellich (Theorem 6.4) then gives self-adjointness, the lower bound and the preservation of cores. Since RA(z)−RA+K(z)=RA+K(z)KRA(z)R_A(z)-R_{A+K}(z)=R_{A+K}(z)KR_A(z)RA​(z)−RA+K​(z)=RA+K​(z)KRA​(z) is compact, Weyl's theorem (Theorem 6.19) gives equality of the essential spectra.

Here σess=σ∖σd\sigma_{ess}=\sigma\setminus\sigma_dσess​=σ∖σd​, where σd\sigma_dσd​ is the set of isolated eigenvalues of finite multiplicity.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_Shared_resolventSet
import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_OneParticle_essentialSpectrum
import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_Shared_IsRelativelyCompact
import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_OneParticle_IsBoundedBelow
Formal statement
namespace TeschlQM.OneParticle

open scoped InnerProductSpace

/-- Teschl, Lemma 6.22, Theorem 6.4 (Kato–Rellich) and Lemma 6.23 / Theorem 6.19 (Weyl), as used
in the proof of Theorem 10.2. Let `A` be self-adjoint and bounded below, and let `K` be symmetric
and relatively compact with respect to `A`. Then `A + K` has domain `𝔇(A)`, is self-adjoint and
bounded below, `σ_ess(A + K) = σ_ess(A)`, and every core of `A` is a core of `A + K`. -/
theorem relativelyCompact_perturbation {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H]
    [InnerProductSpace ℂ H] [CompleteSpace H] (A K : H →ₗ.[ℂ] H) (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A)
    (hAbdd : IsBoundedBelow A)
    (hK : ∀ x y : K.domain, ⟪K x, (y : H)⟫_ℂ = ⟪(x : H), K y⟫_ℂ)
    (hrc : TeschlQM.Shared.IsRelativelyCompact K A) :
    (A + K).domain = A.domain ∧ IsSelfAdjoint (A + K) ∧ IsBoundedBelow (A + K) ∧
      essentialSpectrum (A + K) = essentialSpectrum A ∧
      ∀ S : Submodule ℂ H, A.HasCore S → (A + K).HasCore S := by sorry

end TeschlQM.OneParticle
Source
Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, AMS GSM 99, 2009, Lemma 6.22, Theorem 6.4, Theorem 6.19 and Lemma 6.23 (pp. 135–148), as combined in the proof of Theorem 10.2, p. 222

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me