Relatively compact symmetric perturbations: Kato–Rellich plus Weyl
OpenTeschlQM.OneParticle.relativelyCompact_perturbationmathematical-physicsschrodinger-operatorsspectral-theory
Let be a complex Hilbert space, let be self-adjoint and bounded from below, and let be symmetric and relatively compact with respect to . Then:
- ;
- is self-adjoint and bounded from below;
- ;
- every core of is a core of .
Proof outline: a relatively compact has -bound (Lemma 6.22). Kato–Rellich (Theorem 6.4) then gives self-adjointness, the lower bound and the preservation of cores. Since is compact, Weyl's theorem (Theorem 6.19) gives equality of the essential spectra.
Here , where is the set of isolated eigenvalues of finite multiplicity.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_Shared_resolventSet import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_OneParticle_essentialSpectrum import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_Shared_IsRelativelyCompact import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_OneParticle_IsBoundedBelow
Formal statement
namespace TeschlQM.OneParticle
open scoped InnerProductSpace
/-- Teschl, Lemma 6.22, Theorem 6.4 (Kato–Rellich) and Lemma 6.23 / Theorem 6.19 (Weyl), as used
in the proof of Theorem 10.2. Let `A` be self-adjoint and bounded below, and let `K` be symmetric
and relatively compact with respect to `A`. Then `A + K` has domain `𝔇(A)`, is self-adjoint and
bounded below, `σ_ess(A + K) = σ_ess(A)`, and every core of `A` is a core of `A + K`. -/
theorem relativelyCompact_perturbation {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H]
[InnerProductSpace ℂ H] [CompleteSpace H] (A K : H →ₗ.[ℂ] H) (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A)
(hAbdd : IsBoundedBelow A)
(hK : ∀ x y : K.domain, ⟪K x, (y : H)⟫_ℂ = ⟪(x : H), K y⟫_ℂ)
(hrc : TeschlQM.Shared.IsRelativelyCompact K A) :
(A + K).domain = A.domain ∧ IsSelfAdjoint (A + K) ∧ IsBoundedBelow (A + K) ∧
essentialSpectrum (A + K) = essentialSpectrum A ∧
∀ S : Submodule ℂ H, A.HasCore S → (A + K).HasCore S := by sorry
end TeschlQM.OneParticle
Source
Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, AMS GSM 99, 2009, Lemma 6.22, Theorem 6.4, Theorem 6.19 and Lemma 6.23 (pp. 135–148), as combined in the proof of Theorem 10.2, p. 222