Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Quadratic chaotic inflation: ns=1−42N+1n_s = 1-\frac{4}{2N+1}ns​=1−2N+14​ and r=162N+1r = \frac{16}{2N+1}r=2N+116​

Proved
NewMinimalStandardModel.quadratic_chaotic_inflation_predictions

by Lucas · Oct 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cosmologyinflationmathematical-physics

Let m>0m>0m>0 and MPl>0M_{\rm Pl}>0MPl​>0, and let V(φ)=12m2φ2V(\varphi)=\tfrac12 m^2\varphi^2V(φ)=21​m2φ2. Let φend=2 MPl\varphi_{\rm end}=\sqrt2\,M_{\rm Pl}φend​=2​MPl​, let φ∗>φend\varphi_*>\varphi_{\rm end}φ∗​>φend​, and let

N=1MPl2∫φendφ∗V(ψ)V′(ψ) dψN = \frac{1}{M_{\rm Pl}^2}\int_{\varphi_{\rm end}}^{\varphi_*}\frac{V(\psi)}{V'(\psi)}\,d\psiN=MPl2​1​∫φend​φ∗​​V′(ψ)V(ψ)​dψ

be the number of e-folds between φ∗\varphi_*φ∗​ and φend\varphi_{\rm end}φend​. Then

  1. ϵ(φend)=1\epsilon(\varphi_{\rm end}) = 1ϵ(φend​)=1 (inflation ends at φend\varphi_{\rm end}φend​);
  2. ns(φ∗)=1−6ϵ(φ∗)+2η(φ∗)=1−42N+1n_s(\varphi_*) = 1 - 6\epsilon(\varphi_*) + 2\eta(\varphi_*) = 1-\dfrac{4}{2N+1}ns​(φ∗​)=1−6ϵ(φ∗​)+2η(φ∗​)=1−2N+14​;
  3. r(φ∗)=16 ϵ(φ∗)=162N+1r(\varphi_*) = 16\,\epsilon(\varphi_*) = \dfrac{16}{2N+1}r(φ∗​)=16ϵ(φ∗​)=2N+116​;
  4. if N=50N = 50N=50, then ∣ns−0.96∣<0.005|n_s - 0.96| < 0.005∣ns​−0.96∣<0.005 and ∣r−0.16∣<0.005|r-0.16|<0.005∣r−0.16∣<0.005.

This is the closed-form content behind the paper's predictions ns≃0.96n_s\simeq 0.96ns​≃0.96 and r≃0.16r\simeq0.16r≃0.16 for the φ2\varphi^2φ2 chaotic inflation model.

Formalization Note The paper quotes the numerical values (citing Ellis–Raidal–Yanagida) without stating the number of e-folds; the value N=50N=50N=50 in item 4 is the conventional choice that reproduces them, and items 2–3 hold for every NNN.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NewMinimalStandardModel_Defs
Formal statement
namespace NewMinimalStandardModel

theorem quadratic_chaotic_inflation_predictions (m Mpl φstar N : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m)
    (hMpl : 0 < Mpl) (hφ : Real.sqrt 2 * Mpl < φstar)
    (hN : efolds (quadraticPotential m) Mpl (Real.sqrt 2 * Mpl) φstar = N) :
    slowRollEpsilon (quadraticPotential m) Mpl (Real.sqrt 2 * Mpl) = 1 ∧
    spectralIndex (quadraticPotential m) Mpl φstar = 1 - 4 / (2 * N + 1) ∧
    tensorToScalarRatio (quadraticPotential m) Mpl φstar = 16 / (2 * N + 1) ∧
    (N = 50 →
      |spectralIndex (quadraticPotential m) Mpl φstar - 0.96| < 0.005 ∧
      |tensorToScalarRatio (quadraticPotential m) Mpl φstar - 0.16| < 0.005) := by sorry

end NewMinimalStandardModel
Source
H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li, H. Murayama, The new Minimal Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 117-123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.026, Eq. (5) p. 119 and p. 122 left column ("The spectrum index of the φ² chaotic inflation model is predicted to be 0.96 ... The tensor-to-scalar ratio is 0.16 [21]")
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) - same agent that drafted the statements; NON-BLIND, not an independent auditor

NON-BLIND READ-BACK — NOT INDEPENDENT TESTIMONY. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statement, with full knowledge of the source paper and of the intended meaning. It was not produced by a blind, independent auditor and must not be treated as independent evidence of faithfulness. Reviewers should compare the Lean code against the source themselves.

For all reals m,MPl,φ∗,Nm, M_{\rm Pl}, \varphi_*, Nm,MPl​,φ∗​,N with m>0m>0m>0, MPl>0M_{\rm Pl}>0MPl​>0 and 2 MPl<φ∗\sqrt2\,M_{\rm Pl}<\varphi_*2​MPl​<φ∗​, write V(φ)=m2φ2/2V(\varphi)=m^2\varphi^2/2V(φ)=m2φ2/2 and assume

1MPl2∫2MPlφ∗V(ψ)V′(ψ) dψ=N\frac{1}{M_{\rm Pl}^2}\int_{\sqrt2 M_{\rm Pl}}^{\varphi_*}\frac{V(\psi)}{V'(\psi)}\,d\psi = NMPl2​1​∫2​MPl​φ∗​​V′(ψ)V(ψ)​dψ=N

(Mathlib derivative and interval integral; division by zero is 000). Then all of the following hold: (1) MPl22(V′(2MPl)/V(2MPl))2=1\frac{M_{\rm Pl}^2}{2}\big(V'(\sqrt2M_{\rm Pl})/V(\sqrt2M_{\rm Pl})\big)^2 = 12MPl2​​(V′(2​MPl​)/V(2​MPl​))2=1; (2) 1−6ϵ(φ∗)+2η(φ∗)=1−42N+11 - 6\epsilon(\varphi_*) + 2\eta(\varphi_*) = 1 - \frac{4}{2N+1}1−6ϵ(φ∗​)+2η(φ∗​)=1−2N+14​, where ϵ(φ)=MPl22(V′(φ)/V(φ))2\epsilon(\varphi)=\frac{M_{\rm Pl}^2}{2}(V'(\varphi)/V(\varphi))^2ϵ(φ)=2MPl2​​(V′(φ)/V(φ))2 and η(φ)=MPl2V′′(φ)/V(φ)\eta(\varphi)=M_{\rm Pl}^2V''(\varphi)/V(\varphi)η(φ)=MPl2​V′′(φ)/V(φ); (3) 16 ϵ(φ∗)=162N+116\,\epsilon(\varphi_*) = \frac{16}{2N+1}16ϵ(φ∗​)=2N+116​ (real division; NNN is a real number, not restricted to integers, and is determined by the hypothesis); (4) if N=50N=50N=50 then ∣1−6ϵ(φ∗)+2η(φ∗)−0.96∣<0.005|1-6\epsilon(\varphi_*)+2\eta(\varphi_*) - 0.96|<0.005∣1−6ϵ(φ∗​)+2η(φ∗​)−0.96∣<0.005 and ∣16ϵ(φ∗)−0.16∣<0.005|16\epsilon(\varphi_*)-0.16|<0.005∣16ϵ(φ∗​)−0.16∣<0.005.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me