Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proposition 4.5 (Maximization) — xi(t)x^i(t)xi(t) maximizes pi(X,t−i)−ti(X)p^i(X,t^{-i}) - t^i(X)pi(X,t−i)−ti(X) over attainable XXX

Proved
AlgMechDesign.Additive.maximization

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

mechanism-designp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1scheduling

Let m=(x,p)m=(x,p)m=(x,p) be a truthful mechanism for task scheduling, ttt a positive type vector and iii an agent. For a set XXX of tasks write ti(X)=∑j∈Xtjit^i(X) = \sum_{j\in X} t^i_jti(X)=∑j∈X​tji​. Then for every set XXX that is attainable for agent iii against t−it^{-i}t−i (some positive declaration t′it'^it′i gives xi(t′i,t−i)=Xx^i(t'^i,t^{-i}) = Xxi(t′i,t−i)=X),

pi(X,t−i)−ti(X)  ≤  pi(xi(t),t−i)−ti(xi(t)).p^i(X,t^{-i}) - t^i(X) \;\le\; p^i\bigl(x^i(t),t^{-i}\bigr) - t^i\bigl(x^i(t)\bigr).pi(X,t−i)−ti(X)≤pi(xi(t),t−i)−ti(xi(t)).

That is, the mechanism allocates to agent iii a set of tasks maximizing the agent's utility at the offered prices; otherwise the agent would misreport to obtain the better set.

Formalization Note The paper states the maximization over all X⊆{1,…,k}X\subseteq\{1,\dots,k\}X⊆{1,…,k}. With the price 000 that Definition 12 assigns to unattainable sets this is false in general (a truthful mechanism may never give agent iii the empty set while paying it negative amounts, and then ∅\emptyset∅ with price 000 would beat xi(t)x^i(t)xi(t)). The statement here takes the maximum over attainable sets, which is what the paper's proof sketch establishes.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_Additive_Model
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_Additive_Price
Formal statement
namespace AlgMechDesign.Additive

open Finset

/-- Proposition 4.5 (Maximization), p. 178, over attainable sets: for a truthful mechanism, a
positive type vector `t` and an agent `i`, the set `xⁱ(t)` maximizes
`pⁱ(X, t⁻ⁱ) - tⁱ(X)` among all sets `X` that agent `i` can obtain against `t⁻ⁱ`. -/
theorem maximization {n k : ℕ} (alloc : (Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) → (Fin k → Fin n))
    (pay : (Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) → Fin n → ℝ) (htr : IsTruthful alloc pay)
    (t : Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) (ht : IsType t) (i : Fin n) (X : Finset (Fin k))
    (hX : IsAttainable alloc i t X) :
    price alloc pay i X t - ∑ j ∈ X, t i j ≤
      price alloc pay i (taskSet (alloc t) i) t - ∑ j ∈ taskSet (alloc t) i, t i j := by sorry

end AlgMechDesign.Additive
Source
Nisan, Ronen, Algorithmic Mechanism Design, Games Econ. Behav. 35, 2001, p. 178, Proposition 4.5 (Maximization), restricted to attainable sets
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me