Finite maximal supergraph principle
DisprovedWilliamsonShmoys.finite_planar_supergraph_maximality__p2m_934089cc_df1f_4da4_b973_c115b2e35af8_a1approximation-algorithmsplanar-graphstreewidth
For any predicate on simple graphs over a finite linearly ordered vertex type, every graph satisfying the predicate has a supergraph satisfying it that is maximal among such supergraphs.
Preamble
import Mathlib set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
theorem WilliamsonShmoys.finite_planar_supergraph_maximality__p2m_934089cc_df1f_4da4_b973_c115b2e35af8_a1
{V : Type} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
(H : SimpleGraph V) (P : SimpleGraph V → Prop) (hP : P H) :
∃ K : SimpleGraph V,
H ≤ K ∧ P K ∧
∀ L : SimpleGraph V, H ≤ L → P L → L = K := by sorrySource
David P. Williamson and David B. Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2011, author electronic manuscript, Section 10.2, proof of Theorem 10.11, pp. 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921735. Bounded tree-width of the pieces: Robertson–Seymour (planar graphs of radius r have tree-width at most 3r+1) / Bodlaender (k-outerplanar graphs have tree-width at most 3k-1).