lean_workbook_plus_78699
Proved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Provedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let be a prime. Prove that the following equation has solution in \n
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_78699 (p : ℕ) (hp : 3 < p) (hp1 : p.Prime) : ∃ x y z : ℕ, x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 * p^2 + 1 := by sorry
Positive-integer witnesses in the prose become unrestricted natural numbers.
A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.
Proposed corrected statement
Require 0<x, 0<y, and 0<z for the three natural witnesses, preserving primality and p>3.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_78699 (p : ℕ) (hp : 3 < p) (hp1 : p.Prime) : ∃ x y z : ℕ, x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 * p^2 + 1 := by sorry