Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§3.2, first display of p. 23 — the summed inequality at x = x*

Proved
NonconvexAG.StochComposite.eq_xstar

by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

accelerated-gradientcomposite-optimizationnonconvex-optimizationp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

In the setting of the summed inequality (last display of p. 22), assume also Assumption 2 with constant MMM and ∥x0∥≤M\|x_0\|\le M∥x0​∥≤M. Then along every realization of the oracle samples and for every x∗∈Kx^*\in Kx∗∈K,

Φ(xNag)−Φ(x∗)ΓN+∑k=1N1−LΨβk4βkΓk∥xkag−xkmd∥2≤∥x0−x∗∥22λ1+∑k=1NαkΓk⟨δˉk,x∗−xk−1⟩+LfΓN(∥x∗∥2+2M2)+∑k=1Nβk∥δˉk∥2Γk(1−LΨβk).\frac{\Phi(x^{ag}_N)-\Phi(x^*)}{\Gamma_N}+\sum_{k=1}^N\frac{1-L_\Psi\beta_k}{4\beta_k\Gamma_k}\|x^{ag}_k-x^{md}_k\|^2\le\frac{\|x_0-x^*\|^2}{2\lambda_1}+\sum_{k=1}^N\frac{\alpha_k}{\Gamma_k}\langle\bar\delta_k,x^*-x_{k-1}\rangle+\frac{L_f}{\Gamma_N}\big(\|x^*\|^2+2M^2\big)+\sum_{k=1}^N\frac{\beta_k\|\bar\delta_k\|^2}{\Gamma_k(1-L_\Psi\beta_k)} .ΓN​Φ(xNag​)−Φ(x∗)​+k=1∑N​4βk​Γk​1−LΨ​βk​​∥xkag​−xkmd​∥2≤2λ1​∥x0​−x∗∥2​+k=1∑N​Γk​αk​​⟨δˉk​,x∗−xk−1​⟩+ΓN​Lf​​(∥x∗∥2+2M2)+k=1∑N​Γk​(1−LΨ​βk​)βk​∥δˉk​∥2​.

Formalization Note Pathwise. The paper sets x=x∗x=x^*x=x∗, an optimal solution; only x∗∈Kx^*\in Kx∗∈K is used, so that is the hypothesis. ∥x0∥≤M\|x_0\|\le M∥x0​∥≤M is added as in (2.52).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ConvexOptAlg_SmoothGD_Defs
import Definitions.Def_GhadimiLan_RSG_Model
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexAG_StochComposite_ProxMap
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexAG_StochComposite_RSAG
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open scoped InnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace NonconvexAG.StochComposite

open GhadimiLan.RSG (E)
open ConvexOptAlg.SmoothGD

/-- §3.2, first display of p. 23: the summed inequality at `x = x*`, with the `L_f`-terms bounded
by (2.16) and (2.52), along Algorithm 4, for every realization `ω`, every `N ≥ 1` and every
point `x*` of the domain `K` of `𝒳`, under Assumption 2, `‖x₀‖ ≤ M`, and (2.9), (2.10) for
`k = 1, …, N`. -/
theorem eq_xstar {n : ℕ} (f h : E n → ℝ) (gf gh : E n → E n) (Lf Lh : ℝ)
    (hf : IsBetaSmooth f gf Lf) (hh : IsBetaSmooth h gh Lh) (hhc : ConvexOn ℝ Set.univ h)
    (Ψ : E n → ℝ) (gΨ : E n → E n) (LΨ : ℝ) (hΨ : Ψ = fun x => f x + h x)
    (hgΨ : gΨ = fun x => gf x + gh x) (hLΨ : LΨ = Lf + Lh)
    (K : Set (E n)) (X : E n → ℝ) (hX : ConvexOn ℝ K X)
    (P : E n → E n → ℝ → E n) (hP : IsProxMap K X P) {Ξ : Type*} (G : E n → Ξ → E n)
    (α β lam : ℕ → ℝ) (m : ℕ → ℕ) (hstep : RSAGStepsizes α β lam m) (x0 : E n)
    (M : ℝ) (hA2 : Assumption2 P M) (hx0 : ‖x0‖ ≤ M)
    {Ω : Type*} (ξ : ℕ → Ω → Ξ)
    (N : ℕ) (hN : 1 ≤ N) (h29 : ∀ k ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N, α k * lam k ≤ β k ∧ LΨ * β k < 1)
    (h210 : ∀ k ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N, 2 ≤ k →
      α k / (lam k * NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α k) ≤ α (k - 1) / (lam (k - 1) * NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α (k - 1))) :
    let Φ : E n → ℝ := fun x => Ψ x + X x
    let xk : ℕ → Ω → E n := xSeq G P α β lam m x0 ξ
    let xag : ℕ → Ω → E n := xagSeq G P α β lam m x0 ξ
    let xmd : ℕ → Ω → E n := xmdSeq G P α β lam m x0 ξ
    let δ : ℕ → Ω → E n := deltaBar G gΨ P α β lam m x0 ξ
    ∀ ω : Ω, ∀ xstar ∈ K,
      (Φ (xag N ω) - Φ xstar) / NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α N +
          ∑ k ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N,
            (1 - LΨ * β k) / (4 * β k * NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α k) * ‖xag k ω - xmd k ω‖ ^ 2 ≤
        ‖x0 - xstar‖ ^ 2 / (2 * lam 1) +
          ∑ k ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N, α k / NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α k * inner ℝ (δ k ω) (xstar - xk (k - 1) ω) +
          Lf / NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α N * (‖xstar‖ ^ 2 + 2 * M ^ 2) +
          ∑ k ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N, β k * ‖δ k ω‖ ^ 2 / (NonconvexAG.Smooth.Gamma α k * (1 - LΨ * β k)) := by sorry

end NonconvexAG.StochComposite
Source
Ghadimi & Lan, Accelerated Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Nonlinear and Stochastic Programming, arXiv:1310.3787v1, p. 23, §3.2, first display of the page
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 9, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me