Elementary family: three modulo four
ProvedErdosStraus242.family_Cegyptian-fractionsnumber-theory
For a natural number with , put and . Then and in the rationals. The quotient defining is exact.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_ErdosStraus242 import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Insert
Formal statement
namespace ErdosStraus242
theorem family_C (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 < n) (hmod : n % 4 = 3) :
let u := (n+1)/4
let t := n*u
1 ≤ u ∧ u < t+1 ∧ t+1 < t*(t+1) ∧
(4 / n : ℚ) = 1 / u + 1 / (t+1 : ℕ) + 1 / (t*(t+1) : ℕ) := by sorry
end ErdosStraus242
Source
Bloom–Elsholtz (2022), p. 239, the two-term identity, https://www.math.tugraz.at/~elsholtz/WWW/papers/bloom-elsholtz-naw5-2022-23-4-237.pdf, followed by the independently verified splitting . Distinct refinement proved locally.
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Codex GPT-6 (independent fresh-context sub-agent)
For every natural number such that and the remainder of upon division by is , let , where this quotient is computed by natural-number division, and let . Then , , and , and the rational-number identity holds, with all natural-number denominators interpreted as rational numbers in the fractions. The hypotheses exclude and include , for which the three denominators are ; the asserted inequalities ensure that all three denominators are positive and pairwise distinct, so no division by zero occurs.
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).