Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proposition 3 / Eqs.(17),(18): one-shot cost from an SDP

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P65.oneShot_trace_sdp

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All systems have finite positive dimension and fixed computational bases. Matrix order is Loewner order and logarithms are base two.

For a CPTP channel N:A→B\mathcal N:A\to BN:A→B and ε≥0\varepsilon\ge0ε≥0, let tε(N)t_\varepsilon(\mathcal N)tε​(N) be the infimum of Tr⁡VB\operatorname{Tr}V_BTrVB​ over Hermitian Y,J,VBY,J,V_BY,J,VB​ with Tr⁡BY≤εIA\operatorname{Tr}_B Y\le\varepsilon I_ATrB​Y≤εIA​, Y≥J−JNY\ge J-J_{\mathcal N}Y≥J−JN​, Y≥0Y\ge0Y≥0, J≥0J\ge0J≥0, Tr⁡BJ=IA\operatorname{Tr}_B J=I_ATrB​J=IA​, and J≤IA⊗VBJ\le I_A\otimes V_BJ≤IA​⊗VB​. Then

SNS,ε(1)(N)=log⁡2⌈tε(N)⌉.S_{\rm NS,\varepsilon}^{(1)}(\mathcal N)=\log_2\left\lceil\sqrt{t_\varepsilon(\mathcal N)}\right\rceil.SNS,ε(1)​(N)=log2​⌈tε​(N)​⌉.

The trace infimum is attained by a feasible triple. Integer resource rounding is applied after optimizing the linear objective; the communication cost is its logarithmic postprocessing.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P65
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open Filter QAlgorithms

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder Topology

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P65

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P09 (transposeBob)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P35 (maxRelative)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Independent2.P01 (dampingKraus damping)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Gap48.P33 (phaseFlipChannel)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P06 (Below)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P34 (choi)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P62 (Stochastic)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P63 (Mat)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P67 (IsSubnormalized purifiedDistance)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P69 (replacer permute)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P71 (diamond channelPower channelRelative)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P39 (quantumMutualInformation)

variable {A B C D R : Type} [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A]
  [Fintype B] [DecidableEq B] [Fintype C] [DecidableEq C]
  [Fintype D] [DecidableEq D] [Fintype R] [DecidableEq R]

variable [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B] [Nonempty C] [Nonempty D] [Nonempty R]

/-- Proposition 3, Eqs.(17)--(18), PDF p.6. The trace SDP optimum is attained;
root/ceiling/log are subsequent scalar operations. -/
theorem oneShot_trace_sdp (N : Superop A B) (hN : IsChannel N) (e : ℝ) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
    oneUseSimulationCost .ns N e = roundedTraceCost (traceValue N e) ∧
    ∃ Y J : Mat (A × B), ∃ V : Mat B,
      traceFeasible N e Y J V ∧ V.trace.re = traceValue N e := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P65

end
Source
Quantum Channel Simulation and the Channel's Smooth Max-Information, arXiv:1807.05354v2, PDF p. 6, Proposition 3 / Eqs.(17),(18): one-shot cost from an SDP
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For finite index types A,BA,BA,B, with decidable equality, every channel N:A→BN:A\to BN:A→B and every real e≥0e\ge0e≥0 satisfy the following equality and attainment statement. A channel here admits a finite Kraus representation X↦∑iKiXKi†X\mapsto\sum_iK_iXK_i^\daggerX↦∑i​Ki​XKi†​ with ∑iKi†Ki=I\sum_iK_i^\dagger K_i=I∑i​Ki†​Ki​=I. For each positive integer mmm, let Em(N)E_m(N)Em​(N) be the infimum of 12∥W(P)−N∥⋄\tfrac12\|\mathcal W(P)-N\|_\diamond21​∥W(P)−N∥⋄​ over channels P:A×{0,…,m−1}→{0,…,m−1}×BP:A\times\{0,\ldots,m-1\}\to\{0,\ldots,m-1\}\times BP:A×{0,…,m−1}→{0,…,m−1}×B whose output marginals depend only on the respective input marginals, through channels, on every matrix, where

W(P)(X)b,b′=∑u,v=0m−1P(X⊗∣u⟩⟨v∣)(u,b),(v,b′).\mathcal W(P)(X)_{b,b'} =\sum_{u,v=0}^{m-1}P(X\otimes|u\rangle\langle v|)_{(u,b),(v,b')}.W(P)(X)b,b′​=u,v=0∑m−1​P(X⊗∣u⟩⟨v∣)(u,b),(v,b′)​.

Here ∥Δ∥⋄=sup⁡∥X∥1≤1∥(idA⊗Δ)(X)∥1\|\Delta\|_\diamond=\sup_{\|X\|_1\le1}\|(\mathrm{id}_A\otimes\Delta)(X)\|_1∥Δ∥⋄​=sup∥X∥1​≤1​∥(idA​⊗Δ)(X)∥1​, over all matrices XXX on A×AA\times AA×A, and ∥X∥1=Re⁡tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=RetrX†X​. Let tet_ete​ be the real infimum of Re⁡tr⁡V\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}VRetrV over matrices Y,JY,JY,J on A×BA\times BA×B and Hermitian matrices VVV on BBB satisfying

Y≥0,eIA−Tr⁡BY≥0,Y−J+JN≥0,J≥0,Tr⁡BJ=IA,IA⊗V−J≥0,Y\ge0,\quad eI_A-\operatorname{Tr}_B Y\ge0,\quad Y-J+J_N\ge0,\quad J\ge0,\quad \operatorname{Tr}_B J=I_A,\quad I_A\otimes V-J\ge0,Y≥0,eIA​−TrB​Y≥0,Y−J+JN​≥0,J≥0,TrB​J=IA​,IA​⊗V−J≥0,

where JN((a,b),(a′,b′))=N(∣a⟩⟨a′∣)b,b′J_N((a,b),(a',b'))=N(|a\rangle\langle a'|)_{b,b'}JN​((a,b),(a′,b′))=N(∣a⟩⟨a′∣)b,b′​, and partial traces sum matching indices. Then

inf⁡m∈N, m>0Em(N)≤elog⁡2m=log⁡2⌈te⌉N,\inf_{\substack{m\in\mathbb N,\ m>0\\E_m(N)\le e}}\log_2m =\log_2\left\lceil\sqrt{t_e}\right\rceil_{\mathbb N},m∈N, m>0Em​(N)≤e​inf​log2​m=log2​⌈te​​⌉N​,

and there exist Y,J,VY,J,VY,J,V satisfying exactly these constraints with Re⁡tr⁡V=te\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}V=t_eRetrV=te​. The hypothesis allows e≥1e\ge1e≥1. The ceiling is the natural-number ceiling; real square root and logarithm retain their total definitions, so square root of a nonpositive number is 000 and log⁡20=0\log_2 0=0log2​0=0.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me