Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 3.5 — Algorithm GIN converges to a limit point near which ∥sk∥≤Γ(1−ηk)∥F(xk)∥\|s_k\|\le\Gamma(1-\eta_k)\|F(x_k)\|∥sk​∥≤Γ(1−ηk​)∥F(xk​)∥

Proved
GlobalInexactNewton.Backtracking.theorem_3_5

by mikedeng1 · Oct 6, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

global-convergenceinexact-newtonp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let EEE be a finite-dimensional real normed space and F:E→EF:E\to EF:E→E continuously differentiable. Assume that Algorithm GIN with parameter t∈(0,1)t\in(0,1)t∈(0,1) does not break down, with iterates xkx_kxk​, levels ηk\eta_kηk​ and steps sk=xk+1−xks_k=x_{k+1}-x_ksk​=xk+1​−xk​. Let x∗x_*x∗​ be a limit point of (xk)(x_k)(xk​) for which there is a constant Γ\GammaΓ, independent of kkk, with

∥sk∥≤Γ(1−ηk) ∥F(xk)∥(3.2)\|s_k\|\le\Gamma(1-\eta_k)\,\|F(x_k)\| \tag{3.2}∥sk​∥≤Γ(1−ηk​)∥F(xk​)∥(3.2)

whenever xkx_kxk​ is sufficiently near x∗x_*x∗​ and kkk is sufficiently large. Then xk→x∗x_k\to x_*xk​→x∗​.

No invertibility of F′(x∗)F'(x_*)F′(x∗​) is assumed, and the theorem does not claim F(x∗)=0F(x_*)=0F(x∗​)=0. It complements Theorem 3.3 and gives the convergence part of Theorem 5.2.

Formalization Note The paper says "sufficiently near" and "sufficiently large"; we state: there exist Γ∈R\Gamma\in\mathbb RΓ∈R, δ>0\delta>0δ>0 and KKK such that (3.2) holds for every k≥Kk\ge Kk≥K with ∥xk−x∗∥<δ\|x_k-x_*\|<\delta∥xk​−x∗​∥<δ. Γ\GammaΓ is chosen before kkk ("independent of kkk").

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_GlobalInexactNewton_Backtracking_Method
open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace GlobalInexactNewton.Backtracking

/-- Eisenstat–Walker (1994), p. 401, Theorem 3.5: assume Algorithm GIN does not break down. If
`x_*` is a limit point of `{x_k}` such that there is a `Γ` independent of `k` for which (3.2)
`‖s_k‖ ≤ Γ (1 - η_k) ‖F(x_k)‖` whenever `x_k` is sufficiently near `x_*` and `k` is sufficiently
large, then `x_k → x_*`. "Sufficiently near / large" is `∃ δ > 0, ∃ K`, after `∃ Γ`. No invertibility
of `F'(x_*)` is assumed. -/
theorem theorem_3_5 {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
    (F : E → E) (hF : ContDiff ℝ 1 F) (t : ℝ) (x : ℕ → E) (η : ℕ → ℝ)
    (hrun : IsGINRun F t x η) (xstar : E) (hlim : MapClusterPt xstar atTop x)
    (hΓ : ∃ Γ : ℝ, ∃ δ > 0, ∃ K : ℕ, ∀ k ≥ K, x k ∈ Metric.ball xstar δ →
      ‖x (k + 1) - x k‖ ≤ Γ * (1 - η k) * ‖F (x k)‖) :
    Tendsto x atTop (𝓝 xstar) := by sorry

end GlobalInexactNewton.Backtracking
Source
Eisenstat and Walker, Globally Convergent Inexact Newton Methods, SIAM J. Optim. 4(2) (1994), p. 401, Theorem 3.5
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me