Existence of a maximal drawable supergraph
ProvedWilliamsonShmoys.exists_maximal_planar_supergraph__p2m_cb03d114_7f2d_468d_a111_d39943cc6a95_a1approximation-algorithmsplanar-graphstreewidth
Every drawable graph on this finite vertex type has a drawable supergraph that has no strict drawable supergraph on the same vertices.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_WilliamsonShmoys_PlanarDrawingOn set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
theorem WilliamsonShmoys.exists_maximal_planar_supergraph__p2m_cb03d114_7f2d_468d_a111_d39943cc6a95_a1
{V : Type} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
(M : SimpleGraph V)
(hV : 3 ≤ Fintype.card V)
(hM : WilliamsonShmoys.HasPlanarDrawingOn M) :
∃ N : SimpleGraph V,
(∀ u v, M.Adj u v → N.Adj u v) ∧
WilliamsonShmoys.HasPlanarDrawingOn N ∧
(∀ P : SimpleGraph V,
(∀ u v, N.Adj u v → P.Adj u v) →
WilliamsonShmoys.HasPlanarDrawingOn P →
∀ u v, P.Adj u v → N.Adj u v) := by sorrySource
David P. Williamson and David B. Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2011, author electronic manuscript, Section 10.2, proof of Theorem 10.11, pp. 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921735. Bounded tree-width of the pieces: Robertson–Seymour (planar graphs of radius r have tree-width at most 3r+1) / Bodlaender (k-outerplanar graphs have tree-width at most 3k-1).