Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem E.5 — exact Markov criterion and linear seed bound

Proved
FSS23105365.exact_markov_complete

by YY · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

finite-staterandomized-ac0samplingzenodo-23105365-appendix-e

For every finite Markov chain MMM with a nonempty state set, arbitrary nonnegative real initial and transition weights, and normalized probability laws, exact sampling of every complete trajectory law by polynomial-size constant-depth circuits supplied with finitely many fair bits is possible if and only if every finite path probability is dyadic. Length-zero paths are included, so initial probabilities are part of this condition.

Whenever this condition holds, there exist natural constants D,C,kD,C,kD,C,k depending only on MMM, such that at every length n≥0n\ge0n≥0 an exact sampler has depth at most DDD, size at most C(n+1)kC(n+1)^kC(n+1)k and at most C(n+1)C(n+1)C(n+1) fair bits. Exactness requires every output to encode a trajectory and the probability of each full trajectory to match its Markov probability.

This statement groups the equivalence in Theorem E.5 together with its linear seed guarantee, stated in the motivation of Appendix E and established by its sufficiency construction. Both components are required for this milestone.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FSS23105365_FiniteState
set_option autoImplicit false
open FSS23105365
Formal statement
theorem FSS23105365.exact_markov_complete :
    (∀ (q : ℕ), 0 < q → ∀ (M : MarkovChain q), ExactPathAC0 M ↔ PathDyadic M) ∧
    (∀ (q : ℕ), 0 < q → ∀ (M : MarkovChain q), PathDyadic M →
      ∃ D C k : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ S : Circuit (Fin (n + 1) × Fin q),
        S.depth ≤ D ∧ S.size ≤ C * (n + 1) ^ k ∧
        S.randomBits ≤ C * (n + 1) ∧ ExactLaw S pathEncode (pathLaw M)) := by sorry
Source
Jiarui Zhang, Chengwei Liang, Haozhe Jiang, Binhang Yuan, Jingzhao Zhang, Revision Provably Reduces Sequential Computation in Diffusion Language Models, Zenodo preprint, 2026-10-02, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23105365, Theorem E.5, printed p. 35. Appendix E.1 third bullet and the sufficiency construction, for the linear seed guarantee.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by YY · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me