Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Claim 2.1 and determinacy: a uniform confinement box

Proved
AngelDevil.uniform_confinement

by Yuxuan Xu · Oct 18, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

angel-problemcombinatoricsgame-theory

For each positive integer power, if no single Angel strategy survives against every Devil, there is a positive integer radius and one Devil strategy such that every safe finite play remains inside that box. The radius and Devil are chosen before the Angel strategy and play length. This target includes the introductory determinacy observation as well as Claim 2.1; neither is assumed as an extra hypothesis.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_AngelDevil_Game
open AngelDevil
Formal statement
theorem AngelDevil.uniform_confinement (p : Nat) (hp : 0 < p)
    (h : ¬ AngelWins p) : ∃ N, 0 < N ∧ ∃ D : DevilStrategy,
    ∀ A n, (∀ m, m < n →
      Jump p (current (play A D m)) (current (play A D (m+1))) ∧
      some (current (play A D (m+1))) ∉ (play A D (m+1)).burned) →
      InBox N (current (play A D n)) := by sorry
Source
Andras Mathe, The Angel of power 2 wins, CPC 16 (2007), 363-374; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548306008303; author manuscript internal pagination. Claim 2.1, p. 2, and the introductory determinacy observation, p. 1.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me