Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 7.2, p. 31 — Semi-APGM (Algorithm 2) has ℒ_{k+1} ≤ ℒ_k/(1 + α_k), (87) and (88)

Proved
NAGFlow.APGM.theorem_7_2

by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

accelerated-gradientconvergence-ratelyapunov-functionp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1proximal-gradient

Let VVV be a real Hilbert space and consider min⁡x∈Vf(x)=h(x)+g(x)\min_{x\in V} f(x)=h(x)+g(x)minx∈V​f(x)=h(x)+g(x) (110), where h∈Sμ,L1,1h\in\mathcal S^{1,1}_{\mu,L}h∈Sμ,L1,1​ with 0≤μ≤L<∞0\le\mu\le L<\infty0≤μ≤L<∞ and g:V→R∪{+∞}g:V\to\mathbb R\cup\{+\infty\}g:V→R∪{+∞} is proper, closed and convex. Let x∗∈dom⁡gx^*\in\operatorname{dom}gx∗∈domg be a minimiser of fff. Let (αk,γk,xk,yk,wk,vk)(\alpha_k,\gamma_k,x_k,y_k,w_k,v_k)(αk​,γk​,xk​,yk​,wk​,vk​) be generated by Algorithm 2 (Semi-APGM) with γ0>0\gamma_0>0γ0​>0, η=1/L\eta=1/Lη=1/L, v0∈Vv_0\in Vv0​∈V and x0∈dom⁡gx_0\in\operatorname{dom}gx0​∈domg, and let

Lk=f(xk)−f(x∗)+γk2∥vk−x∗∥2.\mathcal L_k=f(x_k)-f(x^*)+\frac{\gamma_k}{2}\|v_k-x^*\|^2 .Lk​=f(xk​)−f(x∗)+2γk​​∥vk​−x∗∥2.

Then

Lk+1≤Lk1+αk∀ k∈N,(116)\mathcal L_{k+1}\le\frac{\mathcal L_k}{1+\alpha_k}\qquad\forall\,k\in\mathbb N,\qquad(116)Lk+1​≤1+αk​Lk​​∀k∈N,(116)

for all k≥0k\ge0k≥0

Lk≤L0×min⁡{4L(γ0 k+2L)2, (1+min⁡{γ0,μ}L)−k},(87)\mathcal L_k\le\mathcal L_0\times\min\left\{\frac{4L}{(\sqrt{\gamma_0}\,k+2\sqrt L)^2},\ \left(1+\sqrt{\frac{\min\{\gamma_0,\mu\}}{L}}\right)^{-k}\right\},\qquad(87)Lk​≤L0​×min⎩⎨⎧​(γ0​​k+2L​)24L​, (1+Lmin{γ0​,μ}​​)−k⎭⎬⎫​,(87)

and for all k≥1k\ge1k≥1

Lk≤Cγ0,L×min⁡{4k2, (1+min⁡{γ0,μ}L)1−k},Cγ0,L:=Lγ0(f(x0)−f(x∗))+L2∥v0−x∗∥2.(88),(89)\mathcal L_k\le C_{\gamma_0,L}\times\min\left\{\frac{4}{k^2},\ \left(1+\sqrt{\frac{\min\{\gamma_0,\mu\}}{L}}\right)^{1-k}\right\},\qquad C_{\gamma_0,L}:=\frac{L}{\gamma_0}\big(f(x_0)-f(x^*)\big)+\frac L2\|v_0-x^*\|^2 .\qquad(88),(89)Lk​≤Cγ0​,L​×min⎩⎨⎧​k24​, (1+Lmin{γ0​,μ}​​)1−k⎭⎬⎫​,Cγ0​,L​:=γ0​L​(f(x0​)−f(x∗))+2L​∥v0​−x∗∥2.(88),(89)

The theorem gives an accelerated proximal gradient method with one proximal evaluation per iteration whose rate covers the convex case (μ=0\mu=0μ=0, rate O(L/k2)O(L/k^2)O(L/k2)) and the strongly convex case (μ>0\mu>0μ>0, linear rate (1+min⁡{γ0,μ}/L)−k(1+\sqrt{\min\{\gamma_0,\mu\}/L})^{-k}(1+min{γ0​,μ}/L​)−k) in one statement, exactly as Theorem 5.1 does for smooth fff.

Formalization Note. ggg is encoded by its domain D=dom⁡gD=\operatorname{dom}gD=domg and its real values on DDD; values off DDD are never used. Hypotheses made explicit: 0<L0<L0<L (the page divides by LLL and takes L\sqrt LL​), γ0>0\gamma_0>0γ0​>0 and αk>0\alpha_k>0αk​>0 (Algorithm 2's input and step 2), x∗x^*x∗ a minimiser of fff over dom⁡g\operatorname{dom} gdomg (argmin f≠∅f\neq\emptysetf=∅, p. 2), and x0∈dom⁡gx_0\in\operatorname{dom}gx0​∈domg, which is added: if x0∉dom⁡gx_0\notin\operatorname{dom}gx0​∈/domg then L0=Cγ0,L=+∞\mathcal L_0=C_{\gamma_0,L}=+\inftyL0​=Cγ0​,L​=+∞ and (87)–(88) are void on the page. The page's "(110) f∈Sμ,L1,1f\in\mathcal S^{1,1}_{\mu,L}f∈Sμ,L1,1​" is read as h∈Sμ,L1,1h\in\mathcal S^{1,1}_{\mu,L}h∈Sμ,L1,1​, as in (104) and Lemma 7.1, since f=h+gf=h+gf=h+g is nonsmooth. Powers with negative exponent are integer powers of positive reals; 4/k24/k^24/k2 is stated for k≥1k\ge1k≥1, as on the page.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NAGFlow_APGM_Setting
Formal statement
namespace NAGFlow.APGM

/-- Theorem 7.2 (Luo & Chen, arXiv:1909.03145v4, p. 31). Let `h ∈ S^{1,1}_{μ,L}` with
`0 ≤ μ ≤ L < ∞`, let `g : V → ℝ ∪ {+∞}` be proper, closed and convex (encoded by `(g, D)`,
`D = dom g`), `f = h + g`, and let `x* ∈ dom g` be a minimiser of `f`. For every run
`(α, γ, x, y, w, v)` of Algorithm 2 (Semi-APGM) started at `x₀ ∈ dom g`, with
`ℒ_k = f(x_k) − f(x*) + (γ_k/2)‖v_k − x*‖²`:
(116) `ℒ_{k+1} ≤ ℒ_k/(1 + α_k)` for every `k ∈ ℕ`;
(87) `ℒ_k ≤ ℒ₀ · min{4L/(√γ₀ k + 2√L)², (1 + √(min{γ₀, μ}/L))^{−k}}` for every `k ≥ 0`;
(88) `ℒ_k ≤ C_{γ₀,L} · min{4/k², (1 + √(min{γ₀, μ}/L))^{1−k}}` for every `k ≥ 1`, where
(89) `C_{γ₀,L} = (L/γ₀)(f(x₀) − f(x*)) + (L/2)‖v₀ − x*‖²`. -/
theorem theorem_7_2 {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [CompleteSpace V]
    (h : V → ℝ) (gradh : V → V) (μ L : ℝ) (hh : NAGFlow.PredCorr.IsS11 h gradh μ L)
    (g : V → ℝ) (D : Set V) (hg : IsProperClosedConvex g D)
    (xstar : V) (hxstar : xstar ∈ D) (hmin : ∀ z ∈ D, (h + g) xstar ≤ (h + g) z)
    (α γ : ℕ → ℝ) (x y w v : ℕ → V) (hrun : IsAPGMRun gradh g D μ L α γ x y w v)
    (hx0 : x 0 ∈ D) :
    (∀ k : ℕ, NAGFlow.PredCorr.lyap (h + g) xstar x v γ (k + 1) ≤ NAGFlow.PredCorr.lyap (h + g) xstar x v γ k / (1 + α k)) ∧
      (∀ k : ℕ, NAGFlow.PredCorr.lyap (h + g) xstar x v γ k ≤
        NAGFlow.PredCorr.lyap (h + g) xstar x v γ 0 *
          min (4 * L / (Real.sqrt (γ 0) * k + 2 * Real.sqrt L) ^ 2)
            ((1 + Real.sqrt (min (γ 0) μ / L)) ^ (-(k : ℤ)))) ∧
      (∀ k : ℕ, 1 ≤ k → NAGFlow.PredCorr.lyap (h + g) xstar x v γ k ≤
        (L / γ 0 * ((h + g) (x 0) - (h + g) xstar) + L / 2 * ‖v 0 - xstar‖ ^ 2) *
          min (4 / (k : ℝ) ^ 2) ((1 + Real.sqrt (min (γ 0) μ / L)) ^ (1 - (k : ℤ)))) := by sorry

end NAGFlow.APGM
Source
Luo & Chen, arXiv:1909.03145v4, Theorem 7.2 and (116), p. 31; Algorithm 2, p. 30; (87)–(89), p. 21; (110), p. 28
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me