Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proposition 9 — under D, and D.1 or J_N = T^N(J̄) for all N, the DP algorithm converges: J_∞ = J*

Proved
MonotoneDP.Decrease.prop9_dp_convergence

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

dynamic-programmingp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1value-iteration

In the abstract dynamic programming model of Bertsekas (1977), the dynamic programming algorithm generates T(Jˉ),T2(Jˉ),…T(\bar J),T^2(\bar J),\dotsT(Jˉ),T2(Jˉ),…, where T(J)(x)=inf⁡u∈U(x)H(x,u,J)T(J)(x)=\inf_{u\in U(x)}H(x,u,J)T(J)(x)=infu∈U(x)​H(x,u,J), and its limit is

J∞(x)=lim⁡N→∞TN(Jˉ)(x)(x∈S).(49)J_\infty(x)=\lim_{N\to\infty}T^N(\bar J)(x)\qquad(x\in S).\tag{49}J∞​(x)=N→∞lim​TN(Jˉ)(x)(x∈S).(49)

Let JNJ_NJN​ be the optimal value function of the NNN-stage problem (36) and J∗=inf⁡π∈ΠJπJ^*=\inf_{\pi\in\Pi}J_\piJ∗=infπ∈Π​Jπ​ the optimal value function. Suppose Assumption D holds, and that either

  1. Assumption D.1 holds, or
  2. JN=TN(Jˉ)J_N=T^N(\bar J)JN​=TN(Jˉ) for all N=1,2,…N=1,2,\dotsN=1,2,….

Then

J∞=J∗.J_\infty=J^*.J∞​=J∗.

That is, under uniform decrease the value iteration started from Jˉ\bar JJˉ converges to the optimal value function. Under the uniform increase assumption the analogous statement can fail even for simple deterministic problems.

Formalization Note J∞J_\inftyJ∞​ is limUnder atTop of the sequence TN(Jˉ)(x)T^N(\bar J)(x)TN(Jˉ)(x), which is nonincreasing under D and so converges in [−∞,∞][-\infty,\infty][−∞,∞].

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_MonotoneDP_Decrease_Model
import Definitions.Def_MonotoneDP_Decrease_Assumptions
Formal statement
namespace MonotoneDP.Decrease

/-- Bertsekas (1977), p. 456, Proposition 9: let D hold and assume that either D.1 holds or else
`J_N = T^N(J̄)` for all `N = 1, 2, …`, where `J_N` is the optimal value function of the `N`-stage
problem (36). Then `J_∞ = J*`, where `J_∞(x) = lim_N T^N(J̄)(x)` (49). -/
theorem prop9_dp_convergence {S C : Type*} (m : Model S C) (hD : m.AssumptionD)
    (h : m.AssumptionD1 ∨ ∀ N : ℕ, 1 ≤ N → m.JN N = (m.T)^[N] m.Jbar) :
    m.Jinf = m.Jstar := by sorry

end MonotoneDP.Decrease
Source
Bertsekas, Monotone Mappings with Application in Dynamic Programming, SIAM J. Control Optim. 15 (1977), p. 456 (PDF p. 19), Proposition 9; eq. (49) on pp. 455–456. DOI 10.1137/0315031
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me