Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Definitions for Topological Entanglement Entropy and Holography

Definition
QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P58

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

The objects the formalized statements of Topological Entanglement Entropy and Holography (arXiv:0805.1891) are stated in. Each was checked against the paper by a blind read-back and a moderator.

  • RotationalModel: The three reduced actions: (3.13), (3.17), and (4.8), PDF pp.9,10,15.
  • radialDegree: Radius power from the round angular factor; PDF pp.7,15.
  • warp: Coefficient multiplying the squared inverse-profile derivative; PDF pp.9,11,15.
  • warpDerivative: Derivative of the warp coefficient, used in the direct-profile equation.
  • profileDensity: Actual inverse-profile action density, with the source's z parametrization.
  • InverseEquation: Euler--Lagrange equation of the reduced inverse-profile action. This is (3.20) for D3 and the undivided variational form of (4.9) for D4.
  • DirectEquation: Direct-profile Euler--Lagrange equation, (3.7), (3.18), or (4.12). It also applies to annular graphs, whose inverse is not a single-valued function.
  • height: Invert the actual strictly decreasing radius graph on its physical interval. On that graph's range the defining set is a nonempty bounded singleton. Values outside the range are unused. This definition does not introduce a free inverse.
  • RegularGraph: Common regularity, anchoring, stationarity, and finite regulated area conditions. The ODE is imposed only at positive z strictly before the endpoint. A smooth extension through z=0 fixes total derivatives there without prescribing UV coefficients. The disk endpoint may have a singular inverse derivative.
  • IsDisk: Regular disk cap, with the direct profile constructed by inversion. The physical compactified disks have b<1; the singular joining limit is excluded. The zero axis slope is a one-sided derivative, not the derivative of a default extension. Source: PDF pp.7--10,16.
  • IsCylinder: Regular compactified cylinder, with positive endpoint radius and smooth inverse profile at z=1. This does not assume the endpoint expansion. Source: PDF pp.10--11,16.
  • IsProfile: The two regular source topologies, without claiming exactly two solutions.
  • regulatedAction: Unnormalized regulated action integral. Only positive cutoffs below b are used.
  • uv: UV subtraction in the inverse-profile integral; (3.15), (3.23), (4.17). For D3 the dimensionless compactification radius is 1/2.
  • conformalEntropy: Conformal reduced entropy, no end-cap term; (3.13), PDF p.9.
  • d3Entropy: Compactified D3 reduced entropy in the (3.17)/(3.23) normalization. The extra pi in (3.19) is not used.
  • D4Parameters: Independent positive D4 scales with alpha-prime=1; PDF pp.14,20.
  • d4U0: D4 tip scale U0=4pilambda/(9*R4^2), (4.2).
  • d4Newton: Ten-dimensional Newton constant from (4.26); used only for N>=1.
  • d4Prefactor: The explicitly reduced (4.8) prefactor, with R^6=(pi*lambda)^2. No incorrect round-sphere volume is assumed to derive this expression.
  • d4Entropy: D4 entropy for the source's reduced action (4.8).
  • conformalF: Corrected conformal variable x=1-r/R in (3.9). The printed x=1-R/r on PDF p.7 has the wrong sign in the physical interior.
  • FirstD4Coefficient: The first D4 large-radius coefficient equation (4.19), with regular endpoint and boundary data only. Its vanishing is a theorem conclusion, not a hypothesis.
  • SecondD4Coefficient: The next regular coefficient problem (4.20), after the leading coefficient vanishes.
  • d4G: The explicit regular coefficient (4.23), PDF p.20.
  • d4GPrime: Simplified derivative (4.22), including its regular value at z=1.
  • d4ConstantDensity: Radius-independent integrand of (4.24), before its disputed printed evaluation.
  • ShrinkingOscillations: Usual qualitative diminishing-envelope oscillation: a finite limit, with values strictly on both sides in every punctured neighborhood. No rate, exact decimal, or monotonicity of successive numerical extrema is added.
  • IsAnnulus: Nontrivial stationary annular surface, PDF pp.11,22--25 (and conformal pp.8--9). There is no global-minimality field.
Definition code
import Mathlib

/-!
Reduced rotational profile problems in Pakman--Parnachev, arXiv:0805.1891v2.
The actions below are the paper's explicitly chosen reduced actions, not a derivation
of their disputed absolute geometric normalization. All lengths in the compactified
models are dimensionless. Logarithms are natural. No claim identifies arbitrary
stationary profiles with global entropy minimizers.
-/

noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58

open Set Filter MeasureTheory
open scoped Topology

/-- The three reduced actions: (3.13), (3.17), and (4.8), PDF pp.9,10,15. -/
inductive RotationalModel where
  | conformal
  | d3
  | d4
  deriving DecidableEq

/-- Radius power from the round angular factor; PDF pp.7,15. -/
def radialDegree : RotationalModel → ℕ
  | .conformal => 1
  | .d3 => 1
  | .d4 => 2

/-- Coefficient multiplying the squared inverse-profile derivative; PDF pp.9,11,15. -/
def warp : RotationalModel → ℝ → ℝ
  | .conformal, _ => 1
  | .d3, z => 1 - z ^ 4
  | .d4, z => z * (1 - z ^ 3)

/-- Derivative of the warp coefficient, used in the direct-profile equation. -/
def warpDerivative : RotationalModel → ℝ → ℝ
  | .conformal, _ => 0
  | .d3, z => -4 * z ^ 3
  | .d4, z => 1 - 4 * z ^ 3

example : warp .d3 1 = 0 ∧ warp .d4 1 = 0 := by
  norm_num [warp]

example : radialDegree .d4 = 2 := by
  rfl

example : warpDerivative .d4 1 = -3 := by
  norm_num [warpDerivative]

/-- Actual inverse-profile action density, with the source's z parametrization. -/
def profileDensity (m : RotationalModel) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (z : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  r z ^ radialDegree m / z ^ 3 * Real.sqrt (1 + warp m z * deriv r z ^ 2)

example (c z : ℝ) : profileDensity .d3 (fun _ => c) z = c / z ^ 3 := by
  simp [profileDensity, radialDegree]

/-- Euler--Lagrange equation of the reduced inverse-profile action.
This is (3.20) for D3 and the undivided variational form of (4.9) for D4. -/
def InverseEquation (m : RotationalModel) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (z : ℝ) : Prop :=
  deriv (fun u => r u ^ radialDegree m * warp m u * deriv r u /
    (u ^ 3 * Real.sqrt (1 + warp m u * deriv r u ^ 2))) z =
  (radialDegree m : ℝ) * r z ^ (radialDegree m - 1) /
    z ^ 3 * Real.sqrt (1 + warp m z * deriv r z ^ 2)

/-- Direct-profile Euler--Lagrange equation, (3.7), (3.18), or (4.12).
It also applies to annular graphs, whose inverse is not a single-valued function. -/
def DirectEquation (m : RotationalModel) (Z : ℝ → ℝ) (t : ℝ) : Prop :=
  deriv (fun u => u ^ radialDegree m * deriv Z u /
    (Z u ^ 3 * Real.sqrt (warp m (Z u) + deriv Z u ^ 2))) t =
  t ^ radialDegree m *
    (warpDerivative m (Z t) /
      (2 * Z t ^ 3 * Real.sqrt (warp m (Z t) + deriv Z t ^ 2)) -
      3 * Real.sqrt (warp m (Z t) + deriv Z t ^ 2) / Z t ^ 4)

/-- Invert the actual strictly decreasing radius graph on its physical interval.
On that graph's range the defining set is a nonempty bounded singleton. Values
outside the range are unused. This definition does not introduce a free inverse. -/
def height (r : ℝ → ℝ) (b t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  sInf {z : ℝ | z ∈ Icc 0 b ∧ r z = t}

/-- Common regularity, anchoring, stationarity, and finite regulated area conditions.
The ODE is imposed only at positive z strictly before the endpoint. A smooth
extension through z=0 fixes total derivatives there without prescribing UV coefficients.
The disk endpoint may have a singular inverse derivative. -/
def RegularGraph (m : RotationalModel) (R b : ℝ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  0 < R ∧ 0 < b ∧ r 0 = R ∧ ContinuousOn r (Icc 0 b) ∧
  StrictAntiOn r (Icc 0 b) ∧
  (∀ z ∈ Ico 0 b, ContDiffAt ℝ 2 r z) ∧
  (∀ z ∈ Ioo 0 b, 0 < r z ∧ InverseEquation m r z) ∧
  (∀ a : ℝ, 0 < a → a < b → IntervalIntegrable (profileDensity m r) volume a b)

/-- Regular disk cap, with the direct profile constructed by inversion.
The physical compactified disks have b<1; the singular joining limit is excluded.
The zero axis slope is a one-sided derivative, not the derivative of a default extension.
Source: PDF pp.7--10,16. -/
def IsDisk (m : RotationalModel) (R b : ℝ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  RegularGraph m R b r ∧ r b = 0 ∧ (m = .conformal ∨ b < 1) ∧
  ContDiffOn ℝ 2 (height r b) (Ico 0 R) ∧
  HasDerivWithinAt (height r b) 0 (Ici 0) 0

/-- Regular compactified cylinder, with positive endpoint radius and smooth inverse
profile at z=1. This does not assume the endpoint expansion. Source: PDF pp.10--11,16. -/
def IsCylinder (m : RotationalModel) (R : ℝ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  (m = .d3 ∨ m = .d4) ∧ RegularGraph m R 1 r ∧
  0 < r 1 ∧ ContDiffAt ℝ 2 r 1

example : ¬ IsCylinder .conformal 1 (fun _ => 1) := by
  simp [IsCylinder]

/-- The two regular source topologies, without claiming exactly two solutions. -/
def IsProfile (m : RotationalModel) (R b : ℝ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  IsDisk m R b r ∨ (b = 1 ∧ IsCylinder m R r)

/-- Unnormalized regulated action integral. Only positive cutoffs below b are used. -/
def regulatedAction (m : RotationalModel) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  ∫ z in a..b, profileDensity m r z

/-- UV subtraction in the inverse-profile integral; (3.15), (3.23), (4.17).
For D3 the dimensionless compactification radius is 1/2. -/
def uv (m : RotationalModel) (R a : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  match m with
  | .conformal => R / (2 * a ^ 2) + Real.log (a / R) / (8 * R)
  | .d3 => R / (2 * a ^ 2) + Real.log (a / R) / (8 * R)
  | .d4 => R ^ 2 / (2 * a ^ 2) - 3 / (2 * a) + Real.log a / (8 * R ^ 2)

example : uv .d4 1 1 = -1 := by
  norm_num [uv]

/-- Conformal reduced entropy, no end-cap term; (3.13), PDF p.9. -/
def conformalEntropy (N : ℕ) (l : ℝ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  4 * (N : ℝ) ^ 2 * l / (15 * Real.pi) * regulatedAction .conformal r a b

/-- Compactified D3 reduced entropy in the (3.17)/(3.23) normalization.
The extra pi in (3.19) is not used. -/
def d3Entropy (N : ℕ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  4 * (N : ℝ) ^ 2 / 15 * regulatedAction .d3 r a b

/-- Independent positive D4 scales with alpha-prime=1; PDF pp.14,20. -/
structure D4Parameters where
  coupling : ℝ
  circleRadius : ℝ
  coupling_pos : 0 < coupling
  circleRadius_pos : 0 < circleRadius

/-- D4 tip scale U0=4*pi*lambda/(9*R4^2), (4.2). -/
def d4U0 (P : D4Parameters) : ℝ :=
  4 * Real.pi * P.coupling / (9 * P.circleRadius ^ 2)

/-- Ten-dimensional Newton constant from (4.26); used only for N>=1. -/
def d4Newton (P : D4Parameters) (N : ℕ) : ℝ :=
  8 * Real.pi ^ 6 * P.coupling ^ 2 / (N : ℝ) ^ 2

/-- The explicitly reduced (4.8) prefactor, with R^6=(pi*lambda)^2.
No incorrect round-sphere volume is assumed to derive this expression. -/
def d4Prefactor (P : D4Parameters) (N : ℕ) : ℝ :=
  Real.pi ^ 3 * (Real.pi * P.coupling) ^ 2 * d4U0 P * P.circleRadius /
    (2 * d4Newton P N)

/-- D4 entropy for the source's reduced action (4.8). -/
def d4Entropy (P : D4Parameters) (N : ℕ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  d4Prefactor P N * regulatedAction .d4 r a b

example (P : D4Parameters) : d4Newton P 0 = 0 := by
  simp [d4Newton]

/-- Corrected conformal variable x=1-r/R in (3.9).
The printed x=1-R/r on PDF p.7 has the wrong sign in the physical interior. -/
def conformalF (R b : ℝ) (r : ℝ → ℝ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  height r b (R * (1 - x)) / (2 * R * Real.sqrt x)

/-- The first D4 large-radius coefficient equation (4.19), with regular endpoint
and boundary data only. Its vanishing is a theorem conclusion, not a hypothesis. -/
def FirstD4Coefficient (f : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  f 0 = 0 ∧ (∀ z ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ContDiffAt ℝ 2 f z) ∧
  ∀ z ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1,
    4 * deriv f z + 2 * z ^ 3 * deriv f z + 5 * z * deriv f z ^ 3 -
      7 * z ^ 4 * deriv f z ^ 3 + 2 * z ^ 7 * deriv f z ^ 3 -
      2 * z * deriv (deriv f) z + 2 * z ^ 4 * deriv (deriv f) z = 0

/-- The next regular coefficient problem (4.20), after the leading coefficient vanishes. -/
def SecondD4Coefficient (g : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  g 0 = 0 ∧ (∀ z ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ContDiffAt ℝ 2 g z) ∧
  ∀ z ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1,
    4 + 4 * deriv g z + 2 * z ^ 3 * deriv g z -
      2 * z * deriv (deriv g) z + 2 * z ^ 4 * deriv (deriv g) z = 0

/-- The explicit regular coefficient (4.23), PDF p.20. -/
def d4G (z : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  -Real.arctan ((1 + 2 * z) / Real.sqrt 3) / Real.sqrt 3 -
    Real.log (1 + z + z ^ 2) / 2 + Real.pi / (6 * Real.sqrt 3)

/-- Simplified derivative (4.22), including its regular value at z=1. -/
def d4GPrime (z : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  -(1 + z) / (1 + z + z ^ 2)

example : d4GPrime 1 = -(2 : ℝ) / 3 := by
  norm_num [d4GPrime]

/-- Radius-independent integrand of (4.24), before its disputed printed evaluation. -/
def d4ConstantDensity (z : ℝ) : ℝ :=
  (4 * d4G z + z * (1 - z ^ 3) * d4GPrime z ^ 2) / (2 * z ^ 3)

/-- Usual qualitative diminishing-envelope oscillation: a finite limit, with
values strictly on both sides in every punctured neighborhood. No rate, exact
decimal, or monotonicity of successive numerical extrema is added. -/
def ShrinkingOscillations (f : ℝ → ℝ) (side : Set ℝ) (endpoint limit : ℝ) : Prop :=
  Tendsto f (nhdsWithin endpoint side) (nhds limit) ∧
  ∀ delta : ℝ, 0 < delta →
    (∃ x ∈ side, 0 < |x - endpoint| ∧ |x - endpoint| < delta ∧ f x < limit) ∧
    (∃ x ∈ side, 0 < |x - endpoint| ∧ |x - endpoint| < delta ∧ limit < f x)

/-- Nontrivial stationary annular surface, PDF pp.11,22--25 (and conformal pp.8--9).
There is no global-minimality field. -/
def IsAnnulus (m : RotationalModel) (Ri Re : ℝ) (Z : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  0 < Ri ∧ Ri < Re ∧ ContinuousOn Z (Icc Ri Re) ∧ Z Ri = 0 ∧ Z Re = 0 ∧
  ∀ t ∈ Ioo Ri Re, ContDiffAt ℝ 2 Z t ∧ 0 < Z t ∧
    (m = .conformal ∨ Z t < 1) ∧ DirectEquation m Z t

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58
Source
Topological Entanglement Entropy and Holography, arXiv:0805.1891v2, https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.1891v2
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.D4Parameters

This defines a structure whose data consist of two real numbers, called the coupling λ\lambdaλ and the circle radius ccc, together with proofs of the strict inequalities λ>0\lambda>0λ>0 and c>0c>0c>0. Thus every element of this structure carries both positive real parameters and evidence of their positivity.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.DirectEquation

For every rotational model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, every function Z:R→RZ:\mathbb R\to\mathbb RZ:R→R, and every real ttt, the direct-equation predicate means precisely the equality

ddu(unmZ′(u)Z(u)3wm(Z(u))+(Z′(u))2)∣u=t=tnm(vm(Z(t))2Z(t)3wm(Z(t))+(Z′(t))2−3wm(Z(t))+(Z′(t))2Z(t)4),\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{u^{n_m}Z'(u)} {Z(u)^3\sqrt{w_m(Z(u))+(Z'(u))^2}} \right)\right|_{u=t} = t^{n_m} \left( \frac{v_m(Z(t))} {2Z(t)^3\sqrt{w_m(Z(t))+(Z'(t))^2}} - \frac{3\sqrt{w_m(Z(t))+(Z'(t))^2}}{Z(t)^4} \right),dud​(Z(u)3wm​(Z(u))+(Z′(u))2​unm​Z′(u)​)​u=t​=tnm​(2Z(t)3wm​(Z(t))+(Z′(t))2​vm​(Z(t))​−Z(t)43wm​(Z(t))+(Z′(t))2​​),

where nconformal=nd3=1n_{\mathrm{conformal}}=n_{\mathrm{d3}}=1nconformal​=nd3​=1, nd4=2n_{\mathrm{d4}}=2nd4​=2; wconformal(s)=1w_{\mathrm{conformal}}(s)=1wconformal​(s)=1, wd3(s)=1−s4w_{\mathrm{d3}}(s)=1-s^4wd3​(s)=1−s4, wd4(s)=s(1−s3)w_{\mathrm{d4}}(s)=s(1-s^3)wd4​(s)=s(1−s3); and vconformal(s)=0v_{\mathrm{conformal}}(s)=0vconformal​(s)=0, vd3(s)=−4s3v_{\mathrm{d3}}(s)=-4s^3vd3​(s)=−4s3, vd4(s)=1−4s3v_{\mathrm{d4}}(s)=1-4s^3vd4​(s)=1−4s3, for all real sss. No differentiability, positivity, or nonzero-denominator hypotheses are included. Every derivative is assigned value 000 where the relevant function is not differentiable, division by zero has value 000, and square roots of nonpositive arguments have value 000. Thus the equality is meaningful also when t=0t=0t=0, when Z(t)=0Z(t)=0Z(t)=0, or when the square-root argument is nonpositive; its right-hand side is 000 in each of these cases.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.FirstD4Coefficient

For any function f:R→Rf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rf:R→R, this defines the proposition that f(0)=0f(0)=0f(0)=0, that fff is twice continuously differentiable at every real point z∈[0,1]z\in[0,1]z∈[0,1], and that at every z∈(0,1)z\in(0,1)z∈(0,1),

4f′(z)+2z3f′(z)+5z(f′(z))3−7z4(f′(z))3+2z7(f′(z))3−2zf′′(z)+2z4f′′(z)=0.4f'(z)+2z^3f'(z)+5z\bigl(f'(z)\bigr)^3 -7z^4\bigl(f'(z)\bigr)^3 +2z^7\bigl(f'(z)\bigr)^3 -2zf''(z)+2z^4f''(z)=0.4f′(z)+2z3f′(z)+5z(f′(z))3−7z4(f′(z))3+2z7(f′(z))3−2zf′′(z)+2z4f′′(z)=0.

The differentiability requirement at both endpoints is with respect to the full real domain, rather than merely within [0,1][0,1][0,1]. The differential equation is required only on the open interval, and no value at z=1z=1z=1 is prescribed.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.InverseEquation

For every rotational model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, every function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, and every real zzz, the inverse-equation predicate means precisely the equality

ddu(r(u)nmwm(u)r′(u)u31+wm(u)(r′(u))2)∣u=z=nmr(z)nm−1z31+wm(z)(r′(z))2,\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{r(u)^{n_m}w_m(u)r'(u)} {u^3\sqrt{1+w_m(u)(r'(u))^2}} \right)\right|_{u=z} = \frac{n_m r(z)^{n_m-1}}{z^3} \sqrt{1+w_m(z)(r'(z))^2},dud​(u31+wm​(u)(r′(u))2​r(u)nm​wm​(u)r′(u)​)​u=z​=z3nm​r(z)nm​−1​1+wm​(z)(r′(z))2​,

where nconformal=nd3=1n_{\mathrm{conformal}}=n_{\mathrm{d3}}=1nconformal​=nd3​=1, nd4=2n_{\mathrm{d4}}=2nd4​=2, and wconformal(u)=1w_{\mathrm{conformal}}(u)=1wconformal​(u)=1, wd3(u)=1−u4w_{\mathrm{d3}}(u)=1-u^4wd3​(u)=1−u4, wd4(u)=u(1−u3)w_{\mathrm{d4}}(u)=u(1-u^3)wd4​(u)=u(1−u3). Thus the exponent nm−1n_m-1nm​−1 is 000 for the first two models and 111 for the third, with r(z)0=1r(z)^0=1r(z)0=1 even when r(z)=0r(z)=0r(z)=0. No differentiability or positivity assumptions accompany the equality: every derivative displayed is assigned value 000 where the function being differentiated is not differentiable, division by zero has value 000, and square roots of nonpositive real numbers have value 000. The predicate therefore also applies at z=0z=0z=0, where its right-hand side is 000.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.IsAnnulus

For a model mmm chosen from {conformal,d3,d4}\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}{conformal,d3,d4}, real numbers Ri,ReR_i,R_eRi​,Re​, and a function Z:R→RZ:\mathbb R\to\mathbb RZ:R→R, this predicate requires 0<Ri<Re0<R_i<R_e0<Ri​<Re​, continuity of ZZZ on [Ri,Re][R_i,R_e][Ri​,Re​], and Z(Ri)=Z(Re)=0Z(R_i)=Z(R_e)=0Z(Ri​)=Z(Re​)=0. At every t∈(Ri,Re)t\in(R_i,R_e)t∈(Ri​,Re​), it additionally requires that ZZZ be twice continuously differentiable at ttt as a function on R\mathbb RR, that Z(t)>0Z(t)>0Z(t)>0, that either m=conformalm=\mathrm{conformal}m=conformal or Z(t)<1Z(t)<1Z(t)<1, and that

ddu(unZ′(u)Z(u)3W(Z(u))+Z′(u)2)∣u=t=tn(V(Z(t))2Z(t)3W(Z(t))+Z′(t)2−3W(Z(t))+Z′(t)2Z(t)4),\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{u^n Z'(u)} {Z(u)^3\sqrt{W(Z(u))+Z'(u)^2}} \right)\right|_{u=t} = t^n\left( \frac{V(Z(t))} {2Z(t)^3\sqrt{W(Z(t))+Z'(t)^2}} -\frac{3\sqrt{W(Z(t))+Z'(t)^2}}{Z(t)^4} \right),dud​(Z(u)3W(Z(u))+Z′(u)2​unZ′(u)​)​u=t​=tn(2Z(t)3W(Z(t))+Z′(t)2​V(Z(t))​−Z(t)43W(Z(t))+Z′(t)2​​),

where the model determines the quantities by

(n,W(z),V(z))={(1,1,0),m=conformal,(1,1−z4,−4z3),m=d3,(2,z(1−z3),1−4z3),m=d4.(n,W(z),V(z))= \begin{cases} (1,1,0),&m=\mathrm{conformal},\\ (1,1-z^4,-4z^3),&m=\mathrm{d3},\\ (2,z(1-z^3),1-4z^3),&m=\mathrm{d4}. \end{cases}(n,W(z),V(z))=⎩⎨⎧​(1,1,0),(1,1−z4,−4z3),(2,z(1−z3),1−4z3),​m=conformal,m=d3,m=d4.​

The differential equation and the differentiability requirements are imposed only in the open interval; at its endpoints, the stated requirements are continuity and zero boundary values.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.IsCylinder

For a model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, a real number RRR, and a function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, the cylinder predicate holds exactly when m=d3m=\mathrm{d3}m=d3 or m=d4m=\mathrm{d4}m=d4, R>0R>0R>0, the endpoint 111 is positive, r(0)=Rr(0)=Rr(0)=R, rrr is continuous on [0,1][0,1][0,1], r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x) whenever 0≤x<y≤10\le x<y\le10≤x<y≤1, and rrr is twice continuously differentiable at every point of [0,1)[0,1)[0,1); for every z∈(0,1)z\in(0,1)z∈(0,1), r(z)>0r(z)>0r(z)>0 and

ddu(r(u)nw(u)r′(u)u31+w(u)(r′(u))2)∣u=z=nr(z)n−1z31+w(z)(r′(z))2;\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{r(u)^n w(u)r'(u)} {u^3\sqrt{1+w(u)(r'(u))^2}} \right)\right|_{u=z} = \frac{n r(z)^{n-1}}{z^3} \sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2};dud​(u31+w(u)(r′(u))2​r(u)nw(u)r′(u)​)​u=z​=z3nr(z)n−1​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​;

for every real aaa with 0<a<10<a<10<a<1, the function z↦r(z)nz−31+w(z)(r′(z))2z\mapsto r(z)^n z^{-3}\sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2}z↦r(z)nz−31+w(z)(r′(z))2​ is Lebesgue integrable from aaa to 111; and r(1)>0r(1)>0r(1)>0 and rrr is twice continuously differentiable at 111 as well. Here n=1n=1n=1 and w(u)=1−u4w(u)=1-u^4w(u)=1−u4 when m=d3m=\mathrm{d3}m=d3, while n=2n=2n=2 and w(u)=u(1−u3)w(u)=u(1-u^3)w(u)=u(1−u3) when m=d4m=\mathrm{d4}m=d4. Derivatives in the formulas are assigned value 000 where differentiability fails, division by zero has value 000, and square roots of nonpositive arguments have value 000. The equation is required only for 0<z<10<z<10<z<1, and the integrability condition does not include a=0a=0a=0.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.IsDisk

For a model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, real numbers R,bR,bR,b, and a function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, the disk predicate means that R>0R>0R>0, b>0b>0b>0, r(0)=Rr(0)=Rr(0)=R, rrr is continuous on [0,b][0,b][0,b], r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x) for every 0≤x<y≤b0\le x<y\le b0≤x<y≤b, and rrr is twice continuously differentiable at every point of [0,b)[0,b)[0,b); for every z∈(0,b)z\in(0,b)z∈(0,b), r(z)>0r(z)>0r(z)>0 and

ddu(r(u)nw(u)r′(u)u31+w(u)(r′(u))2)∣u=z=nr(z)n−1z31+w(z)(r′(z))2;\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{r(u)^n w(u)r'(u)} {u^3\sqrt{1+w(u)(r'(u))^2}} \right)\right|_{u=z} = \frac{n r(z)^{n-1}}{z^3} \sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2};dud​(u31+w(u)(r′(u))2​r(u)nw(u)r′(u)​)​u=z​=z3nr(z)n−1​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​;

and for every real aaa with 0<a<b0<a<b0<a<b, the function z↦r(z)nz−31+w(z)(r′(z))2z\mapsto r(z)^n z^{-3}\sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2}z↦r(z)nz−31+w(z)(r′(z))2​ is Lebesgue integrable from aaa to bbb. Here (n,w(u))=(1,1)(n,w(u))=(1,1)(n,w(u))=(1,1), (1,1−u4)(1,1-u^4)(1,1−u4), or (2,u(1−u3))(2,u(1-u^3))(2,u(1−u3)) according as mmm is conformal\mathrm{conformal}conformal, d3\mathrm{d3}d3, or d4\mathrm{d4}d4, respectively. In addition, r(b)=0r(b)=0r(b)=0, either m=conformalm=\mathrm{conformal}m=conformal or b<1b<1b<1, and the function

H(t)=inf⁡{z∈[0,b]:r(z)=t}H(t)=\inf\{z\in[0,b]:r(z)=t\}H(t)=inf{z∈[0,b]:r(z)=t}

is twice continuously differentiable within [0,R)[0,R)[0,R) and has derivative 000 at t=0t=0t=0 when restricted to [0,∞)[0,\infty)[0,∞). The infimum defining HHH is assigned value 000 if its defining set is empty; its definition is for every real ttt. Derivatives in the displayed equation and integrand are assigned value 000 where differentiability fails, division by zero has value 000, and square roots of nonpositive arguments have value 000. No equation is imposed at z=0z=0z=0 or z=bz=bz=b, no integrability down to a=0a=0a=0 is required, and the stated regularity of HHH excludes t=Rt=Rt=R.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.IsProfile

For a model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, real numbers R,bR,bR,b, and a function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, the profile predicate holds exactly when the following common requirements hold and at least one of the two alternatives below holds: R>0R>0R>0, b>0b>0b>0, r(0)=Rr(0)=Rr(0)=R, rrr is continuous on [0,b][0,b][0,b], r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x) whenever 0≤x<y≤b0\le x<y\le b0≤x<y≤b, rrr is twice continuously differentiable at every point of [0,b)[0,b)[0,b), and for every z∈(0,b)z\in(0,b)z∈(0,b), r(z)>0r(z)>0r(z)>0 and

ddu(r(u)nw(u)r′(u)u31+w(u)(r′(u))2)∣u=z=nr(z)n−1z31+w(z)(r′(z))2;\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{r(u)^n w(u)r'(u)} {u^3\sqrt{1+w(u)(r'(u))^2}} \right)\right|_{u=z} = \frac{n r(z)^{n-1}}{z^3} \sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2};dud​(u31+w(u)(r′(u))2​r(u)nw(u)r′(u)​)​u=z​=z3nr(z)n−1​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​;

also, for every real aaa with 0<a<b0<a<b0<a<b, the function z↦r(z)nz−31+w(z)(r′(z))2z\mapsto r(z)^n z^{-3}\sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2}z↦r(z)nz−31+w(z)(r′(z))2​ is Lebesgue integrable from aaa to bbb. Here (n,w(u))=(1,1)(n,w(u))=(1,1)(n,w(u))=(1,1), (1,1−u4)(1,1-u^4)(1,1−u4), or (2,u(1−u3))(2,u(1-u^3))(2,u(1−u3)) according as mmm is conformal\mathrm{conformal}conformal, d3\mathrm{d3}d3, or d4\mathrm{d4}d4, respectively. The first alternative is that r(b)=0r(b)=0r(b)=0, either m=conformalm=\mathrm{conformal}m=conformal or b<1b<1b<1, and the function H(t)=inf⁡{z∈[0,b]:r(z)=t}H(t)=\inf\{z\in[0,b]:r(z)=t\}H(t)=inf{z∈[0,b]:r(z)=t} is twice continuously differentiable within [0,R)[0,R)[0,R) and has derivative 000 at t=0t=0t=0 within [0,∞)[0,\infty)[0,∞). The second alternative is that b=1b=1b=1, m=d3m=\mathrm{d3}m=d3 or m=d4m=\mathrm{d4}m=d4, r(1)>0r(1)>0r(1)>0, and rrr is twice continuously differentiable at 111. The height function HHH is defined for every real ttt, with value 000 when its defining set is empty. Derivatives in the equation and integrand are assigned value 000 where differentiability fails, division by zero has value 000, and square roots of nonpositive arguments have value 000. Neither alternative requires the displayed equation at either endpoint or integrability from a=0a=0a=0.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.RegularGraph

For a model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, real numbers R,bR,bR,b, and a function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, the regular-graph predicate holds exactly when R>0R>0R>0, b>0b>0b>0, r(0)=Rr(0)=Rr(0)=R, rrr is continuous on [0,b][0,b][0,b], r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x)r(y)<r(x) whenever 0≤x<y≤b0\le x<y\le b0≤x<y≤b, and rrr is twice continuously differentiable at every z∈[0,b)z\in[0,b)z∈[0,b); additionally, for every z∈(0,b)z\in(0,b)z∈(0,b), one has r(z)>0r(z)>0r(z)>0 and

ddu(r(u)nw(u)r′(u)u31+w(u)(r′(u))2)∣u=z=nr(z)n−1z31+w(z)(r′(z))2;\left.\frac{d}{du} \left( \frac{r(u)^n w(u)r'(u)} {u^3\sqrt{1+w(u)(r'(u))^2}} \right)\right|_{u=z} = \frac{n r(z)^{n-1}}{z^3} \sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2};dud​(u31+w(u)(r′(u))2​r(u)nw(u)r′(u)​)​u=z​=z3nr(z)n−1​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​;

finally, for every real aaa satisfying 0<a<b0<a<b0<a<b, the function

z⟼r(z)nz31+w(z)(r′(z))2z\longmapsto \frac{r(z)^n}{z^3}\sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2}z⟼z3r(z)n​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​

is Lebesgue integrable on the interval from aaa to bbb. Here (n,w(u))=(1,1)(n,w(u))=(1,1)(n,w(u))=(1,1) for m=conformalm=\mathrm{conformal}m=conformal, (1,1−u4)(1,1-u^4)(1,1−u4) for m=d3m=\mathrm{d3}m=d3, and (2,u(1−u3))(2,u(1-u^3))(2,u(1−u3)) for m=d4m=\mathrm{d4}m=d4, so n−1n-1n−1 is respectively 0,0,10,0,10,0,1. All derivatives in these formulas are totalized by assigning value 000 where differentiability fails, division by zero has value 000, and square roots of nonpositive arguments have value 000. The twice-continuous-differentiability requirement includes 000 as a point of the full real domain but excludes bbb; the equation and strict positivity of rrr are required only on (0,b)(0,b)(0,b), and no integrability requirement down to a=0a=0a=0 is included.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.RotationalModel

The type of rotational models has exactly three distinct values, named conformal\mathrm{conformal}conformal, d3\mathrm{d3}d3, and d4\mathrm{d4}d4. Equality between any two values of this type is decidable.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.SecondD4Coefficient

For any function g:R→Rg:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rg:R→R, this defines the proposition that g(0)=0g(0)=0g(0)=0, that ggg is twice continuously differentiable at every real point z∈[0,1]z\in[0,1]z∈[0,1], and that at every z∈(0,1)z\in(0,1)z∈(0,1),

4+4g′(z)+2z3g′(z)−2zg′′(z)+2z4g′′(z)=0.4+4g'(z)+2z^3g'(z)-2zg''(z)+2z^4g''(z)=0.4+4g′(z)+2z3g′(z)−2zg′′(z)+2z4g′′(z)=0.

The differentiability requirement at both endpoints is with respect to the full real domain, rather than merely within [0,1][0,1][0,1]. The differential equation is required only on the open interval, and no value at z=1z=1z=1 is prescribed.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.ShrinkingOscillations

For an arbitrary function f:R→Rf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rf:R→R, an arbitrary set S⊆RS\subseteq\mathbb RS⊆R, and arbitrary real numbers eee and LLL, this predicate means that fff converges to LLL as its argument approaches eee within SSS, and that it takes values strictly below and strictly above LLL at points of SSS arbitrarily close to, but distinct from, eee. More explicitly, the convergence requires that for every ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 there is an η>0\eta>0η>0 such that every x∈Sx\in Sx∈S with ∣x−e∣<η|x-e|<\eta∣x−e∣<η satisfies ∣f(x)−L∣<ε|f(x)-L|<\varepsilon∣f(x)−L∣<ε; additionally, for every real δ>0\delta>0δ>0, there exist x−,x+∈Sx_-,x_+\in Sx−​,x+​∈S such that

0<∣x−−e∣<δ,f(x−)<L,0<∣x+−e∣<δ,L<f(x+).0<|x_--e|<\delta,\qquad f(x_-)<L, \qquad 0<|x_+-e|<\delta,\qquad L<f(x_+).0<∣x−​−e∣<δ,f(x−​)<L,0<∣x+​−e∣<δ,L<f(x+​).

The endpoint eee need not belong to SSS; if it does, the convergence requirement forces f(e)=Lf(e)=Lf(e)=L. The witness requirements exclude an empty set or a set with no points distinct from eee sufficiently close to eee.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.conformalEntropy

For every natural number NNN, including N=0N=0N=0, every real number lll, every function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, and every pair of real endpoints a,ba,ba,b, this defines

conformalEntropy⁡(N,l,r,a,b)=4N2l15π∫abr(z)z31+r′(z)2 dz.\operatorname{conformalEntropy}(N,l,r,a,b) =\frac{4N^2l}{15\pi} \int_a^b\frac{r(z)}{z^3}\sqrt{1+r'(z)^2}\,dz.conformalEntropy(N,l,r,a,b)=15π4N2l​∫ab​z3r(z)​1+r′(z)2​dz.

The natural number NNN is viewed as a real number in this expression. No sign, differentiability, or integrability assumptions are imposed. The derivative is assigned zero wherever it does not exist, and division by zero is zero, so the integrand is zero at z=0z=0z=0. The integral is the oriented Lebesgue interval integral, assigned zero if its integrand is not integrable between the endpoints; equal endpoints give zero. The resulting expression is also zero whenever N=0N=0N=0 or l=0l=0l=0.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.conformalF

For any real numbers R,b,xR,b,xR,b,x and any function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, this defines

conformalF⁡(R,b,r,x)=inf⁡{z∈R:0≤z≤b and r(z)=R(1−x)}2Rx.\operatorname{conformalF}(R,b,r,x) = \frac{\displaystyle\inf\{z\in\mathbb R:0\le z\le b \ \text{and}\ r(z)=R(1-x)\}} {2R\sqrt{x}}.conformalF(R,b,r,x)=2Rx​inf{z∈R:0≤z≤b and r(z)=R(1−x)}​.

No continuity, monotonicity, positivity, or existence of a point in the displayed set is assumed. If the set is nonempty, it is bounded below and its ordinary real infimum is used; if it is empty, its assigned infimum is zero, including when b<0b<0b<0. The real square root is zero for x≤0x\le0x≤0, and division by zero is zero. Thus the defined value is zero whenever x≤0x\le0x≤0, R=0R=0R=0, or the displayed set is empty.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d3Entropy

For every natural number NNN, including N=0N=0N=0, every function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, and every pair of real endpoints a,ba,ba,b, this defines

d3Entropy⁡(N,r,a,b)=4N215∫abr(z)z31+(1−z4)r′(z)2 dz.\operatorname{d3Entropy}(N,r,a,b) =\frac{4N^2}{15} \int_a^b\frac{r(z)}{z^3}\sqrt{1+(1-z^4)r'(z)^2}\,dz.d3Entropy(N,r,a,b)=154N2​∫ab​z3r(z)​1+(1−z4)r′(z)2​dz.

Here NNN is viewed as a real number. No positivity, differentiability, or integrability hypotheses are required. The derivative is assigned zero wherever it does not exist, division by zero is zero, and the real square root is zero for nonpositive arguments; hence the integrand is zero at z=0z=0z=0. The integral is the oriented Lebesgue interval integral, assigned zero when its integrand is not integrable between the endpoints; equal endpoints give zero. For N=0N=0N=0, the defined value is zero.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4ConstantDensity

For every real number zzz, this defines

4[−arctan⁡ ⁣(1+2z3)3−log⁡(1+z+z2)2+π63]+z(1−z3)(−1+z1+z+z2)22z3.\frac{ 4\left[ -\frac{\arctan\!\left(\frac{1+2z}{\sqrt3}\right)}{\sqrt3} -\frac{\log(1+z+z^2)}2 +\frac{\pi}{6\sqrt3} \right] +z(1-z^3)\left(-\frac{1+z}{1+z+z^2}\right)^2 }{2z^3}.2z34[−3​arctan(3​1+2z​)​−2log(1+z+z2)​+63​π​]+z(1−z3)(−1+z+z21+z​)2​.

Here log⁡\loglog is the natural logarithm. The definition includes z=0z=0z=0: division by zero in the real-number operations used here yields 000, so the defined density has value 000 at z=0z=0z=0.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4Entropy

For every parameter structure PPP, consisting of real numbers λ=P.coupling>0\lambda=P.\mathrm{coupling}>0λ=P.coupling>0 and c=P.circleRadius>0c=P.\mathrm{circleRadius}>0c=P.circleRadius>0 together with proofs of these inequalities, every natural number NNN, every function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, and all real endpoints a,ba,ba,b, this defines

d4Entropy⁡(P,N,r,a,b)=π3(πλ)2(4πλ9c2)c2(8π6λ2N2)∫abr(z)2z31+z(1−z3)r′(z)2 dz,\operatorname{d4Entropy}(P,N,r,a,b) = \frac{\displaystyle \pi^3(\pi\lambda)^2 \left(\frac{4\pi\lambda}{9c^2}\right)c} {\displaystyle 2\left(\frac{8\pi^6\lambda^2}{N^2}\right)} \int_a^b \frac{r(z)^2}{z^3} \sqrt{1+z(1-z^3)r'(z)^2}\,dz,d4Entropy(P,N,r,a,b)=2(N28π6λ2​)π3(πλ)2(9c24πλ​)c​∫ab​z3r(z)2​1+z(1−z3)r′(z)2​dz,

with NNN viewed as a real number. No regularity or sign assumptions on rrr, and no restrictions on the endpoints, are imposed. The derivative is assigned zero wherever it does not exist, division by zero is zero, and the real square root is zero for nonpositive arguments; the integrand is therefore zero at z=0z=0z=0. The integral is the oriented Lebesgue interval integral and is assigned zero if its integrand is not integrable between the endpoints; equal endpoints give zero. The case N=0N=0N=0 is included and makes the prefactor, and hence the defined value, zero.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4G

For every real number zzz, this defines the real-valued function

G(z)=−arctan⁡ ⁣(1+2z3)3−log⁡(1+z+z2)2+π63,G(z)= -\frac{\arctan\!\left(\frac{1+2z}{\sqrt3}\right)}{\sqrt3} -\frac{\log(1+z+z^2)}2 +\frac{\pi}{6\sqrt3},G(z)=−3​arctan(3​1+2z​)​−2log(1+z+z2)​+63​π​,

where log⁡\loglog is the natural logarithm and 3\sqrt33​ is the nonnegative square root of 333. The definition applies to all real zzz; its logarithm has a strictly positive argument for every such zzz.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4GPrime

For every real number zzz, this defines the real-valued function

Gprime(z)=−1+z1+z+z2.G_{\mathrm{prime}}(z)=-\frac{1+z}{1+z+z^2}.Gprime​(z)=−1+z+z21+z​.

Its denominator is strictly positive for every real zzz, so the formula applies without any restriction on zzz.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4Newton

For every parameter structure PPP, consisting of real numbers λ=P.coupling>0\lambda=P.\mathrm{coupling}>0λ=P.coupling>0 and c=P.circleRadius>0c=P.\mathrm{circleRadius}>0c=P.circleRadius>0 together with proofs of these inequalities, and every natural number NNN, this defines

d4Newton⁡(P,N)=8π6λ2N2,\operatorname{d4Newton}(P,N)=\frac{8\pi^6\lambda^2}{N^2},d4Newton(P,N)=N28π6λ2​,

where NNN is viewed as a real number. The circle radius is part of the input structure although it does not occur in the formula. The case N=0N=0N=0 is included and gives zero, because division by zero is defined to be zero.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4Prefactor

For every parameter structure PPP, consisting of real numbers λ=P.coupling>0\lambda=P.\mathrm{coupling}>0λ=P.coupling>0 and c=P.circleRadius>0c=P.\mathrm{circleRadius}>0c=P.circleRadius>0 together with proofs of these inequalities, and every natural number NNN, viewed as a real number in the formula, this defines

d4Prefactor⁡(P,N)=π3(πλ)2(4πλ9c2)c2(8π6λ2N2).\operatorname{d4Prefactor}(P,N) = \frac{\displaystyle \pi^3(\pi\lambda)^2 \left(\frac{4\pi\lambda}{9c^2}\right)c} {\displaystyle 2\left(\frac{8\pi^6\lambda^2}{N^2}\right)}.d4Prefactor(P,N)=2(N28π6λ2​)π3(πλ)2(9c24πλ​)c​.

There is no assumption that NNN is positive. All divisions use the convention that division by zero is zero; consequently, when N=0N=0N=0, both the inner quotient in the denominator and the entire displayed quotient evaluate to zero.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.d4U0

For every parameter structure PPP, consisting of real numbers λ=P.coupling>0\lambda=P.\mathrm{coupling}>0λ=P.coupling>0 and c=P.circleRadius>0c=P.\mathrm{circleRadius}>0c=P.circleRadius>0 together with proofs of these inequalities, this defines

d4U0⁡(P)=4πλ9c2.\operatorname{d4U0}(P)=\frac{4\pi\lambda}{9c^2}.d4U0(P)=9c24πλ​.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.height

For every function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R and every pair of real numbers b,tb,tb,t, the height Hr,b(t)H_{r,b}(t)Hr,b​(t) is defined to be

Hr,b(t)=inf⁡{z∈R:0≤z≤b and r(z)=t}.H_{r,b}(t)=\inf\{z\in\mathbb R:0\le z\le b\ \text{and}\ r(z)=t\}.Hr,b​(t)=inf{z∈R:0≤z≤b and r(z)=t}.

No continuity, monotonicity, positivity, or existence of a solution is assumed. When the set is nonempty, it is bounded and this is its real infimum, which need not itself belong to the set. When the set is empty, the defined value is 000; this includes every ttt when b<0b<0b<0. For b=0b=0b=0, the set is either empty or {0}\{0\}{0}, so the height is 000 for every ttt.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.large_Nc_scaling

Use either the choice k=1k=1k=1, w(z)=1−z4w(z)=1-z^4w(z)=1−z4, called the d3\mathrm{d3}d3 case, or the choice k=2k=2k=2, w(z)=z(1−z3)w(z)=z(1-z^3)w(z)=z(1−z3), called the d4\mathrm{d4}d4 case, and write

Dr(z)=r(z)kz31+w(z)(r′(z))2.D_r(z)=\frac{r(z)^k}{z^3}\sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2}.Dr​(z)=z3r(z)k​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​.

For each choice, say that real numbers R,bR,bR,b and a function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R satisfy the profile conditions when all of the following hold: R>0R>0R>0, b>0b>0b>0, r(0)=Rr(0)=Rr(0)=R, rrr is continuous and strictly decreasing on [0,b][0,b][0,b], rrr is twice continuously differentiable at every point of [0,b)[0,b)[0,b), and, for every 0<z<b0<z<b0<z<b, r(z)>0r(z)>0r(z)>0 and

ddu(r(u)kw(u)r′(u)u31+w(u)(r′(u))2)∣u=z=k r(z)k−1z31+w(z)(r′(z))2.\left.\frac{d}{du} \left(\frac{r(u)^k w(u)r'(u)} {u^3\sqrt{1+w(u)(r'(u))^2}}\right)\right|_{u=z} = \frac{k\,r(z)^{k-1}}{z^3}\sqrt{1+w(z)(r'(z))^2}.dud​(u31+w(u)(r′(u))2​r(u)kw(u)r′(u)​)​u=z​=z3kr(z)k−1​1+w(z)(r′(z))2​.

Also require that DrD_rDr​ be interval integrable with respect to Lebesgue measure from sss to bbb for every real 0<s<b0<s<b0<s<b, and require one of two alternatives: either r(b)=0r(b)=0r(b)=0, b<1b<1b<1, and the function

h(t)=inf⁡{z∈[0,b]:r(z)=t}h(t)=\inf\{z\in[0,b]:r(z)=t\}h(t)=inf{z∈[0,b]:r(z)=t}

is twice continuously differentiable on [0,R)[0,R)[0,R) and has derivative zero at t=0t=0t=0 within [0,∞)[0,\infty)[0,∞); or b=1b=1b=1, r(1)>0r(1)>0r(1)>0, and rrr is twice continuously differentiable at 111. Here the real infimum is the total infimum operation, taking value zero for an empty set. The theorem asserts the conjunction of two statements. First, for every real R,bR,bR,b and every r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R satisfying these profile conditions in the d3\mathrm{d3}d3 case, there exists a real FFF such that, for every natural number N>0N>0N>0,

lim⁡a→0+4N215[∫abr(z)z31+(1−z4)(r′(z))2 dz−R2a2−log⁡(a/R)8R]=N2F.\lim_{a\to0^+} \frac{4N^2}{15} \left[ \int_a^b\frac{r(z)}{z^3}\sqrt{1+(1-z^4)(r'(z))^2}\,dz -\frac{R}{2a^2}-\frac{\log(a/R)}{8R} \right] =N^2F.a→0+lim​154N2​[∫ab​z3r(z)​1+(1−z4)(r′(z))2​dz−2a2R​−8Rlog(a/R)​]=N2F.

Second, for every parameter pair PPP with real coupling κ>0\kappa>0κ>0 and circle radius L>0L>0L>0, every real R,bR,bR,b, and every r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R satisfying these profile conditions in the d4\mathrm{d4}d4 case, there exists a real FFF such that, for every natural number N>0N>0N>0, on setting

KP,N=π3(πκ)2(4πκ9L2)L2(8π6κ2N2),K_{P,N}= \frac{\pi^3(\pi\kappa)^2\left(\frac{4\pi\kappa}{9L^2}\right)L} {2\left(\frac{8\pi^6\kappa^2}{N^2}\right)},KP,N​=2(N28π6κ2​)π3(πκ)2(9L24πκ​)L​,

one has

lim⁡a→0+KP,N[∫abr(z)2z31+z(1−z3)(r′(z))2 dz−R22a2+32a−log⁡a8R2]=N2F.\lim_{a\to0^+} K_{P,N} \left[ \int_a^b\frac{r(z)^2}{z^3}\sqrt{1+z(1-z^3)(r'(z))^2}\,dz -\frac{R^2}{2a^2}+\frac{3}{2a}-\frac{\log a}{8R^2} \right] =N^2F.a→0+lim​KP,N​[∫ab​z3r(z)2​1+z(1−z3)(r′(z))2​dz−2a2R2​+2a3​−8R2loga​]=N2F.

In each statement FFF is chosen independently of NNN, although it may depend on the previously quantified profile and, in the second statement, on PPP; neither statement requires the limit assertion for N=0N=0N=0.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.profileDensity

For every rotational model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4}, every function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, and every real zzz, the profile density is the real number

ρm,r(z)=r(z)nmz31+wm(z)(r′(z))2,\rho_{m,r}(z)=\frac{r(z)^{n_m}}{z^3} \sqrt{1+w_m(z)\bigl(r'(z)\bigr)^2},ρm,r​(z)=z3r(z)nm​​1+wm​(z)(r′(z))2​,

where nconformal=nd3=1n_{\mathrm{conformal}}=n_{\mathrm{d3}}=1nconformal​=nd3​=1, nd4=2n_{\mathrm{d4}}=2nd4​=2, and wconformal(z)=1w_{\mathrm{conformal}}(z)=1wconformal​(z)=1, wd3(z)=1−z4w_{\mathrm{d3}}(z)=1-z^4wd3​(z)=1−z4, wd4(z)=z(1−z3)w_{\mathrm{d4}}(z)=z(1-z^3)wd4​(z)=z(1−z3). No differentiability, positivity, or nonzero-denominator assumptions are imposed. Here and in the formula, the derivative is assigned the value 000 at a point where rrr is not differentiable, division by zero has value 000, and the real square root has value 000 for a nonpositive argument; in particular, the density is defined at z=0z=0z=0 and has value 000 there.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.radialDegree

For a rotational model mmm, whose possible values are conformal\mathrm{conformal}conformal, d3\mathrm{d3}d3, and d4\mathrm{d4}d4, the natural number nmn_mnm​ called its radial degree is defined by

nconformal=1,nd3=1,nd4=2.n_{\mathrm{conformal}}=1,\qquad n_{\mathrm{d3}}=1,\qquad n_{\mathrm{d4}}=2.nconformal​=1,nd3​=1,nd4​=2.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.regulatedAction

For any model mmm among conformal,d3,d4\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}conformal,d3,d4, any function r:R→Rr:\mathbb R\to\mathbb Rr:R→R, and any real endpoints a,ba,ba,b, this defines

regulatedAction⁡(m,r,a,b)={∫abr(z)z31+r′(z)2 dz,m=conformal,∫abr(z)z31+(1−z4)r′(z)2 dz,m=d3,∫abr(z)2z31+z(1−z3)r′(z)2 dz,m=d4.\operatorname{regulatedAction}(m,r,a,b)= \begin{cases} \displaystyle\int_a^b \frac{r(z)}{z^3}\sqrt{1+r'(z)^2}\,dz, & m=\mathrm{conformal},\\[4pt] \displaystyle\int_a^b \frac{r(z)}{z^3}\sqrt{1+(1-z^4)r'(z)^2}\,dz, & m=\mathrm{d3},\\[4pt] \displaystyle\int_a^b \frac{r(z)^2}{z^3}\sqrt{1+z(1-z^3)r'(z)^2}\,dz, & m=\mathrm{d4}. \end{cases}regulatedAction(m,r,a,b)=⎩⎨⎧​∫ab​z3r(z)​1+r′(z)2​dz,∫ab​z3r(z)​1+(1−z4)r′(z)2​dz,∫ab​z3r(z)2​1+z(1−z3)r′(z)2​dz,​m=conformal,m=d3,m=d4.​

These are oriented Lebesgue interval integrals: reversing the endpoints reverses the sign, and equal endpoints give zero. No regularity, integrability, or positivity hypotheses are imposed. Here r′(z)r'(z)r′(z) is assigned zero wherever rrr is not differentiable, division by zero is zero, and the real square root is zero for nonpositive arguments; in particular, each displayed integrand is zero at z=0z=0z=0. If the integrand is not integrable on the interval between the endpoints, the interval integral is assigned zero.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.uv

For any model mmm among conformal,d3,d4\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}conformal,d3,d4 and any real numbers R,aR,aR,a, this defines

uv⁡(m,R,a)={R2a2+log⁡(a/R)8R,m=conformal or m=d3,R22a2−32a+log⁡a8R2,m=d4.\operatorname{uv}(m,R,a)= \begin{cases} \displaystyle\frac{R}{2a^2}+\frac{\log(a/R)}{8R}, & m=\mathrm{conformal}\text{ or }m=\mathrm{d3},\\[6pt] \displaystyle\frac{R^2}{2a^2}-\frac{3}{2a}+\frac{\log a}{8R^2}, & m=\mathrm{d4}. \end{cases}uv(m,R,a)=⎩⎨⎧​2a2R​+8Rlog(a/R)​,2a2R2​−2a3​+8R2loga​,​m=conformal or m=d3,m=d4.​

There are no positivity or nonzero assumptions on RRR or aaa. Every division by zero evaluates to zero; the real logarithm satisfies log⁡0=0\log 0=0log0=0 and, for nonzero real ttt, means log⁡∣t∣\log|t|log∣t∣. Thus the definition includes zero and negative inputs.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.warp

For every rotational model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4} and every real number zzz, the real number wm(z)w_m(z)wm​(z) is defined by

wconformal(z)=1,wd3(z)=1−z4,wd4(z)=z(1−z3).w_{\mathrm{conformal}}(z)=1,\qquad w_{\mathrm{d3}}(z)=1-z^4,\qquad w_{\mathrm{d4}}(z)=z(1-z^3).wconformal​(z)=1,wd3​(z)=1−z4,wd4​(z)=z(1−z3).

There is no restriction on zzz, including no positivity restriction on zzz or on the resulting value.

QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P58.warpDerivative

For every rotational model m∈{conformal,d3,d4}m\in\{\mathrm{conformal},\mathrm{d3},\mathrm{d4}\}m∈{conformal,d3,d4} and every real number zzz, the real number vm(z)v_m(z)vm​(z) is defined by

vconformal(z)=0,vd3(z)=−4z3,vd4(z)=1−4z3.v_{\mathrm{conformal}}(z)=0,\qquad v_{\mathrm{d3}}(z)=-4z^3,\qquad v_{\mathrm{d4}}(z)=1-4z^3.vconformal​(z)=0,vd3​(z)=−4z3,vd4​(z)=1−4z3.

These formulas define the function for all real zzz.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me