Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 4.1, p. 11 — bounding the dual variable: the dual step is controlled by the primal steps

Proved
NAPPAL.Rate.lemma_4_1

by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

augmented-lagrangiandual-variablep2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1primal-dual

Let Assumptions 1 and 2 hold and let {wk}\{w^k\}{wk} be generated by NAPP-AL (with any admissible steps). Then:

  1. for every k≥0k\ge0k≥0,
∥B⊤(pk−pk+1)∥2≥λmin⁡(B⊤B)∥pk−pk+1∥2;\|B^\top(p^k-p^{k+1})\|^2\ge\lambda_{\min}(B^\top B)\|p^k-p^{k+1}\|^2;∥B⊤(pk−pk+1)∥2≥λmin​(B⊤B)∥pk−pk+1∥2;
  1. for every k≥1k\ge1k≥1,
B⊤pk=−∇vG(uk−1,vk−1)−∇H(vk−1)+γB⊤[Θ(uk)−Θ(uk−1)];B^\top p^k=-\nabla_vG(u^{k-1},v^{k-1})-\nabla H(v^{k-1})+\gamma B^\top[\Theta(u^k)-\Theta(u^{k-1})];B⊤pk=−∇v​G(uk−1,vk−1)−∇H(vk−1)+γB⊤[Θ(uk)−Θ(uk−1)];
  1. for every k≥1k\ge1k≥1,
∥pk−pk+1∥2≤3γ2∥B∥2(LΘ0)2λmin⁡(B⊤B)∥uk−uk+1∥2+3(LG+γ∥B∥LΘ0)2λmin⁡(B⊤B)∥uk−1−uk∥2+3(LG+LH)2λmin⁡(B⊤B)∥vk−1−vk∥2.\|p^k-p^{k+1}\|^2\le\frac{3\gamma^2\|B\|^2(L^0_\Theta)^2}{\lambda_{\min}(B^\top B)}\|u^k-u^{k+1}\|^2+\frac{3(L_G+\gamma\|B\|L^0_\Theta)^2}{\lambda_{\min}(B^\top B)}\|u^{k-1}-u^k\|^2+\frac{3(L_G+L_H)^2}{\lambda_{\min}(B^\top B)}\|v^{k-1}-v^k\|^2.∥pk−pk+1∥2≤λmin​(B⊤B)3γ2∥B∥2(LΘ0​)2​∥uk−uk+1∥2+λmin​(B⊤B)3(LG​+γ∥B∥LΘ0​)2​∥uk−1−uk∥2+λmin​(B⊤B)3(LG​+LH​)2​∥vk−1−vk∥2.

The dual iterates have no step size of their own; this lemma bounds their movement by the movement of the primal iterates, which is what lets the potential Λk\Lambda^kΛk decrease.

Formalization Note Parts 2 and 3 involve wk−1w^{k-1}wk−1 and are stated for k≥1k\ge1k≥1. The lemma does not assume the step rule (8); its hypotheses are Assumptions 1–2 and the NAPP-AL relation only, as printed. B⊤B^\topB⊤ is the adjoint of BBB and ∥B∥\|B\|∥B∥ the operator norm.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NAPPAL_Rate_Setting
open Filter Topology
open scoped InnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace NAPPAL.Rate

theorem lemma_4_1 {n d m : ℕ} (P : NAPPAL.KL.Problem n d m) (LG LH L0 LK β γ σ : ℝ) (LOmj : Fin m → ℝ)
    (K : NAPPAL.KL.E n → ℝ) (δ ε : ℕ → ℝ) (u : ℕ → NAPPAL.KL.E n) (v : ℕ → NAPPAL.KL.E d) (p : ℕ → NAPPAL.KL.E m)
    (hA1 : NAPPAL.KL.Assumption1 P LG LH L0 LOmj) (hA2 : NAPPAL.KL.Assumption2 P K β LK γ LG LH)
    (hrun : IsNAPPAL P K γ σ δ ε u v p) :
    (∀ k : ℕ, ‖ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint P.B (p k - p (k + 1))‖ ^ 2 ≥
        NAPPAL.KL.lamMin P * ‖p k - p (k + 1)‖ ^ 2) ∧
    (∀ k : ℕ, 1 ≤ k →
      ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint P.B (p k) =
        -NAPPAL.KL.gradV P (u (k - 1)) (v (k - 1)) - gradient P.H (v (k - 1)) +
          γ • ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint P.B (NAPPAL.KL.Theta P (u k) - NAPPAL.KL.Theta P (u (k - 1)))) ∧
    (∀ k : ℕ, 1 ≤ k →
      ‖p k - p (k + 1)‖ ^ 2 ≤
        3 * γ ^ 2 * ‖P.B‖ ^ 2 * L0 ^ 2 / NAPPAL.KL.lamMin P * ‖u k - u (k + 1)‖ ^ 2 +
          3 * (LG + γ * ‖P.B‖ * L0) ^ 2 / NAPPAL.KL.lamMin P * ‖u (k - 1) - u k‖ ^ 2 +
          3 * (LG + LH) ^ 2 / NAPPAL.KL.lamMin P * ‖v (k - 1) - v k‖ ^ 2) := by sorry

end NAPPAL.Rate
Source
Zhu, Zhao, Zhang, A First-Order Primal-Dual Method for Nonconvex Constrained Optimization Based on the Augmented Lagrangian, arXiv:2007.12219v1, p. 11, Lemma 4.1(i)–(iii)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me