Okun's law: growth-rate form with exact remainder
ProvedOkunsLaw.growth_rate_formLet , , , be the series of actual output, potential GDP, actual unemployment rate and natural rate of unemployment, let , and let be a year with , and . Write . Assume
- the gap version of Okun's law holds for and ;
- the natural rate of unemployment does not change: ;
- full-employment output grows at rate : .
Then
This is the growth-rate (difference) form of Okun's law, , with the approximation made exact: the last term is exactly the error committed by replacing the factor with .
Formalization Note The source's approximations and are taken as exact hypotheses 2 and 3; the approximation is replaced by the explicit remainder term.
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_OkunsLaw_defs
namespace OkunsLaw
theorem growth_rate_form (c k : ℝ) (Y Ybar u ubar : ℕ → ℝ) (t : ℕ)
(hY : 0 < Y t) (hYbar₀ : 0 < Ybar t) (hYbar₁ : 0 < Ybar (t + 1))
(h₀ : GapLaw c Y Ybar u ubar t) (h₁ : GapLaw c Y Ybar u ubar (t + 1))
(hnatural : delta ubar t = 0) (hpotential : growthRate Ybar t = k) :
growthRate Y t
= k - c * delta u t - c * delta u t * ((Ybar t + delta Ybar t) / Y t - 1) := by
sorry
end OkunsLawRead-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent that drafted the statements (non-blind)
Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statements, at the account owner's explicit request. It was not produced by a blind, independent auditor, and the author knew the intended meaning when writing it. Reviewers should not treat it as independent evidence of faithfulness.
Throughout, is a real number; are arbitrary real sequences (indexed by years ), with no sign, boundedness or other assumptions beyond those listed; and is an arbitrary year. denotes , and denotes the proposition
(with the convention that a real number divided by is ). Additionally is an arbitrary real number.
Hypotheses.
- , and .
- and both hold, with the same .
- , i.e. .
- , i.e. is exactly the growth rate of from to (not an average over several years).
Conclusion. An exact equality:
There is no approximation and no bound on the last term; the statement is the identity above. All hypotheses concern only indices and . Since , the bracket equals . The hypotheses are jointly satisfiable (e.g. , , ).
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.