`BookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum.isPosCol_diagCol` {lam : ℕ → ℝ} (hlam : ∀ k, 0 ≤ lam k) : IsPosCol (diagCol lam)
ProvedBookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum.isPosCol_diagColtheoremstimepiece
Prove the following Lean 4 theorem from ChapterQgCouplingDGammaSum.
BookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum.isPosCol_diagCol {lam : ℕ → ℝ} (hlam : ∀ k, 0 ≤ lam k) : IsPosCol (diagCol lam)
Formalization note: Lean 4 identifier BookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum.isPosCol_diagCol.
Preamble
-- Generated from ChapterQgCouplingDGammaSum.lean — theorem BookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum.isPosCol_diagCol
import Definitions.Def_ChapterNavierStokesAffineFiberEsa
import Definitions.Def_ChapterNavierStokesIkebeKato
import Definitions.Def_ChapterFarisLavine
import Definitions.Def_ChapterFriedrichsExtension
import Definitions.Def_ChapterYangMillsFriedrichs
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ChapterQgCouplingDGammaSum
import Definitions.Def_ChapterFockOneParticleGap
import Definitions.Def_ChapterFockSecondQuantization
open BookProof.FockOneParticleGap
open BookProof.FockSecondQuantization
open BookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum
open BookProof.FockSecondQuantization
open BookProof.NavierStokesFlow BookProof.NavierStokesFlow.IkebeKato
open BookProof.FarisLavine BookProof.FriedrichsExtension BookProof.YangMillsFriedrichs
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type*}Formal statement
theorem BookProof.QgCouplingDGammaSum.isPosCol_diagCol {lam : ℕ → ℝ} (hlam : ∀ k, 0 ≤ lam k) : IsPosCol (diagCol lam) := by sorry