Limits of normalized fast planes have asymptotic winding one at
ProvedFiniteEnergyPlane.hasWindInfAt_one_of_tendstoCInftyLocOncompactnesspseudoholomorphic-curvessymplectization
Let be a sequence in the set of fast finite-energy planes asymptotic to a periodic Reeb orbit at on a strictly star-shaped level , with and -energy outside the closed unit disk. Suppose the radial rescalings of the normalized at the point converge in , with a finite subset of the closed unit disk, to a finite-energy -holomorphic curve on that has a nondegenerate positive puncture at over and nonzero -energy. Then .
The fast condition on planes is thus inherited at by those limits that carry -energy.
Formalization Note is V 1 \ {0}, with = aCoord H and = proj H; = fastPlaneSet H J P K γ. The conclusion is HasWindInfAt H w cylInf 1 1; the rescaling is (Real.exp (-(2 * a_k 2))) • u_k.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane
open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real
/-- Let `uₖ` be a sequence in `fastPlaneSet H J P K γ` whose shifts `e^{-2aₖ(2)} • uₖ` converge in
`C^∞_loc(ℂ \ Γ)` to a finite-energy `J̃`-holomorphic curve `w` on `ℂ \ Γ`, with `Γ` a finite subset of
the closed unit disk. If `w` has a nondegenerate positive puncture at `∞` over `P` and positive
`dλ`-energy, then `wind_∞(w, ∞) = 1` in the global frame. -/
theorem hasWindInfAt_one_of_tendstoCInftyLocOn (H : V 1 → ℝ)
(hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H) (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
(P : ReebOrbit H) (K : Set (V 1)) (γ : ℝ)
(u : ℕ → ℂ → V 1) (hu : ∀ k, u k ∈ fastPlaneSet H J P K γ)
(Γ : Finset ℂ) (hΓ : ∀ z ∈ Γ, ‖z‖ ≤ 1) (w : ℂ → V 1) (hw : IsFiniteEnergyCurve H J (↑Γ)ᶜ w)
(hconv : JHolomorphic.TendstoCInftyLocOn
(fun k z => Real.exp (-(2 * aCoord H (u k 2))) • u k z) w (↑Γ)ᶜ)
(hinf : IsNondegenerateEnd H w cylInf P 1) (hpos : dlambdaEnergy H (↑Γ)ᶜ w ≠ 0) :
HasWindInfAt H w cylInf 1 1 := by
sorry
end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Trans. AMS 364 (2012), arXiv:0812.4076, Section 4 (Lemma 4.17 and its proof)