Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Uniform continuity on compact subsets of the constructed space

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.lemma4

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let GGG be a Hausdorff locally compact second-countable topological group and let AAA be a Hausdorff locally compact second-countable abelian topological group with a continuous action of GGG by automorphisms, written g⋅ag\cdot ag⋅a. Let F:G×G→AF:G\times G\to AF:G×G→A be a Borel measurable two-cocycle, with pointwise identity

F(g,h)+F(gh,k)=g⋅F(h,k)+F(g,hk),F(1,g)=F(g,1)=0.F(g,h)+F(gh,k)=g\cdot F(h,k)+F(g,hk),\qquad F(1,g)=F(g,1)=0.F(g,h)+F(gh,k)=g⋅F(h,k)+F(g,hk),F(1,g)=F(g,1)=0.

Assume that FFF is continuous on UF×UFU_F\times U_FUF​×UF​, where UFU_FUF​ is an open identity neighborhood. Let E=A×FGE=A\times_F GE=A×F​G, with multiplication (a,g)(b,h)=(a+g⋅b+F(g,h),gh)(a,g)(b,h)=(a+g\cdot b+F(g,h),gh)(a,g)(b,h)=(a+g⋅b+F(g,h),gh) and inverse (a,g)−1=(−g−1⋅(a+F(g,g−1)),g−1)(a,g)^{-1}=(-g^{-1}\cdot(a+F(g,g^{-1})),g^{-1})(a,g)−1=(−g−1⋅(a+F(g,g−1)),g−1). Equip EEE with the topology generated by left translates of the rectangles UA×UGU_A\times U_GUA​×UG​, where UA,UGU_A,U_GUA​,UG​ are open identity neighborhoods and FFF is continuous on UG×UGU_G\times U_GUG​×UG​. Write e=(0,1)e=(0,1)e=(0,1) and π(a,g)=g\pi(a,g)=gπ(a,g)=g.

Let f:E→Rf:E\to\mathbb Rf:E→R be continuous, let ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, and let C⊆EC\subseteq EC⊆E be compact. There is a neighborhood VVV of eee such that

x,y∈C,x−1y∈V⟹∣f(x)−f(y)∣<ε.x,y\in C,\quad x^{-1}y\in V\quad\Longrightarrow\quad |f(x)-f(y)|<\varepsilon.x,y∈C,x−1y∈V⟹∣f(x)−f(y)∣<ε.

The assertion supplies compact-set uniform continuity without a pre-assumed uniform group structure.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P08
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08

open Set MeasureTheory

open scoped BigOperators Topology CompactlySupported

section ConstructedExtension

variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
  [T2Space G] [LocallyCompactSpace G] [SecondCountableTopology G]
  [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
  [AddCommGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalAddGroup A]
  [T2Space A] [LocallyCompactSpace A] [SecondCountableTopology A]
  [MeasurableSpace A] [BorelSpace A]

/-- Lemma 4, PDF p. 15: compact-set uniform continuity for the constructed
space, before global group continuity is known. Empty compact sets are permitted. -/
theorem lemma4 (D : LocalCocycle G A) (f : ExtensionPoint D → ℝ)
    (hf : Continuous f) (eps : ℝ) (heps : 0 < eps)
    (C : Set (ExtensionPoint D)) (hC : IsCompact C) :
    ∃ V : Set (ExtensionPoint D), V ∈ nhds (identityPoint D) ∧
      ∀ x ∈ C, ∀ y ∈ C, actionTwistedMul D (twistedInv D x) y ∈ V →
        |f x - f y| < eps := by sorry

end ConstructedExtension

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08
Source
On Cohomology theory for topological groups, arXiv:1009.4519v1, PDF p. 15, Lemma 4: uniform continuity on compact sets before global group continuity
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable additive abelian topological group, both with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms αp\alpha_pαp​, with α1=id\alpha_1=\mathrm{id}α1​=id, αpq=αp∘αq\alpha_{pq}=\alpha_p\circ\alpha_qαpq​=αp​∘αq​, and jointly continuous evaluation; a measurable function κ:G×G→A\kappa:G\times G\to Aκ:G×G→A satisfying αp(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r)\alpha_p(\kappa(q,r))+\kappa(p,qr)=\kappa(p,q)+\kappa(pq,r)αp​(κ(q,r))+κ(p,qr)=κ(p,q)+κ(pq,r) and κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0\kappa(1,p)=\kappa(p,1)=0κ(1,p)=κ(p,1)=0; and an open neighborhood U0U_0U0​ of 111 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on U02U_0^2U02​. Put E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G, define (a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp(b)+κ(p,q),pq)(a,p)\star(b,q)=(a+\alpha_p(b)+\kappa(p,q),pq)(a,p)⋆(b,q)=(a+αp​(b)+κ(p,q),pq), and give EEE the topology generated by z⋆(UA×UG)z\star(U_A\times U_G)z⋆(UA​×UG​) for z∈Ez\in Ez∈E, open UA∋0U_A\ni0UA​∋0, and open UG∋1U_G\ni1UG​∋1 such that κ\kappaκ is continuous on UG2U_G^2UG2​. Define e=(0,1)e=(0,1)e=(0,1) and x†=(αp−1(−(a+κ(p,p−1))),p−1)x^\dagger=(\alpha_{p^{-1}}(-(a+\kappa(p,p^{-1}))),p^{-1})x†=(αp−1​(−(a+κ(p,p−1))),p−1) for x=(a,p)x=(a,p)x=(a,p). For every continuous function f:E→Rf:E\to\mathbb Rf:E→R, every real number ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, and every compact set C⊆EC\subseteq EC⊆E, there exists a neighborhood VVV of eee such that

x,y∈C and x†⋆y∈V⟹∣f(x)−f(y)∣<ε.x,y\in C\ \text{and}\ x^\dagger\star y\in V \quad\Longrightarrow\quad |f(x)-f(y)|<\varepsilon.x,y∈C and x†⋆y∈V⟹∣f(x)−f(y)∣<ε.

Here a neighborhood need only contain an open set containing eee; VVV itself need not be open. No support or sign condition is imposed on fff. The compact set CCC may be empty, in which case the condition on x,yx,yx,y is vacuous.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me