Over K ≤ F, a 2×3 configuration in V₀ + Ku + Ku⁻¹, with V₀ ⊆ F and u transcendental over F, has its products in V₀
ProvedDiazModulus.rank_one_config_inverse_adjoinLet be subfields of , a -subspace of contained in , and transcendental over . If free and free over have all six products in , then all six products lie in .
Proof. Write with and , and , so . The minors of vanish at , hence vanish, and DiazModulus.rank_one_polynomial_matrix_factor gives ; the are -free, and so are the , being non-zero multiples of and . If some : when every is constant, the two lie on one -line; otherwise every has degree at most and, using that the constant and coefficients of lie in , the three lie in a -span of two numbers. Both are impossible, so every ; replacing by , which is also transcendental over , gives every . So .
Novelty. Not found in the sources read in this form. Waldschmidt (Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups, Prop. 12.2 and the Remark on p. 424) covers without ; the factorisation and degree argument is that of DiazModulus.generic_circle_point_no_two_by_three_configuration. Routine.
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
open Complex ComplexConjugate
namespace DiazModulus
theorem rank_one_config_inverse_adjoin (K F : Subfield ℂ) (hKF : K ≤ F)
(V₀ : Submodule K ℂ) (hV₀ : ∀ v ∈ V₀, v ∈ F) (u : ℂ) (hu : Transcendental F u)
(x : Fin 2 → ℂ) (y : Fin 3 → ℂ) (hx : LinearIndependent K x) (hy : LinearIndependent K y)
(hxy : ∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ V₀ ⊔ Submodule.span K ({u, u⁻¹} : Set ℂ)) :
∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ V₀ := by
sorry
end DiazModulus