Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

A linear lower bound 9392000p<Kp\tfrac{939}{2000}p<K_p2000939​p<Kp​ for the cyclic candidate constant

Proved
HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction.cyclicConstant_gt_separator

by savarin · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

hlawka-schattenscalar-estimatesharp-constanttail-bound

For a real exponent ppp and t≥0t\ge0t≥0, let Ap(t)=(tp+2)1/pA_p(t)=(t^p+2)^{1/p}Ap​(t)=(tp+2)1/p, Bp(t)=(2∣1−t∣p+2p)1/pB_p(t)=(2|1-t|^p+2^p)^{1/p}Bp​(t)=(2∣1−t∣p+2p)1/p; let

Rp(t)  =  3Ap(t)−31/p∣2−t∣6Ap(t)−3Bp(t)R_p(t) \;=\; \frac{3A_p(t)-3^{1/p}|2-t|}{6A_p(t)-3B_p(t)}Rp​(t)=6Ap​(t)−3Bp​(t)3Ap​(t)−31/p∣2−t∣​

be the cyclic ratio, and let

Kp  =  sup⁡{ Rp(t):1/2≤t≤2 }K_p \;=\; \sup\{\,R_p(t) : 1/2\le t\le2\,\}Kp​=sup{Rp​(t):1/2≤t≤2}

be the cyclic candidate constant.

The theorem states that for every real p≥256p\ge256p≥256,

9392000 p  <  Kp.\frac{939}{2000}\,p \;<\; K_p.2000939​p<Kp​.

It shows that KpK_pKp​ grows at least linearly in ppp, with an explicit rational slope. Elsewhere in the diagonal construction, after a hypothetical failure of the KpK_pKp​-Hlawka inequality has been relabeled so its total norm is the largest of the four vectors involved and rescaled so its three singleton norms sum to one, this lower bound on KpK_pKp​ is compared against a matching upper bound (from a separate scalar-envelope estimate) at the reference value 53/15053/15053/150; that comparison is what confines such a rescaled failure's total norm below 53/15053/15053/150.

Formalization Note. The proof evaluates RpR_pRp​ at the parameter constructionParameter p := Real.exp (-(Real.log p * p⁻¹)), i.e. t∗=exp⁡(−log⁡(p)/p)=p−1/pt^*=\exp(-\log(p)/p)=p^{-1/p}t∗=exp(−log(p)/p)=p−1/p for p>0p>0p>0; for p≥256p\ge256p≥256 it satisfies 1/2≤t∗≤11/2\le t^*\le11/2≤t∗≤1, so in particular t∗≥0t^*\ge0t∗≥0, and for t≥0t\ge0t≥0 the quantities Ap(t)A_p(t)Ap​(t) and Bp(t)B_p(t)Bp​(t) are the coordinate ppp-norms of each of the cyclic vectors (−t,1,1),(1,−t,1),(1,1,−t)∈R3(-t,1,1),(1,-t,1),(1,1,-t)\in\mathbb R^3(−t,1,1),(1,−t,1),(1,1,−t)∈R3 and of each of their pairwise sums.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_DiagonalConstruction_Cyclic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.ExponentialBounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Jensen
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.SpecificFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.NormPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sign.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Compact

/-
Copyright (c) 2026 Ezzeri Esa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ezzeri Esa
-/

/-!
# Explicit uniform estimates above the cutoff

Rational logarithm bounds separate the cyclic witness and scalar envelope
at the common intermediate value `939 * p / 2000`.
-/

open HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction
Formal statement
theorem HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction.cyclicConstant_gt_separator {p : ℝ} (hp : 256 ≤ p) :
    (939 / 2000 : ℝ) * p < cyclicConstant p := by sorry
Source
https://github.com/savarin/hlawka-schatten/blob/79aa498bfcf7b22bd91d771fb32ec278e2d4704b/HlawkaSchatten/DiagonalConstruction/TailEstimates.lean#L153-L169
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 29, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by savarin · Sep 29, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

  • Endorsed by marwahaha · Sep 30, 2026

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me