Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 2 — the edge-load potential Φˇ\check\PhiΦˇ is strictly convex (and C2C^2C2 for C1C^1C1 costs)

Proved
BayesRouting.VOI.loadPotential_strictConvex

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

convexityp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1routing-game

Let

Φˇ(w)=∑s∑e∑tπ(s,t)∫0we(t)ces(z) dz\check\Phi(w)=\sum_{s}\sum_{e}\sum_{t}\pi(s,t)\int_0^{w_e(t)}c^s_e(z)\,dzΦˇ(w)=s∑​e∑​t∑​π(s,t)∫0we​(t)​ces​(z)dz

be the potential of a Bayesian routing game as a function of the edge load w=(we(t))e∈E,t∈Tw=(w_e(t))_{e\in\mathcal E,t\in\mathcal T}w=(we​(t))e∈E,t∈T​. Then:

  1. Φˇ\check\PhiΦˇ is strictly convex on the whole space of edge loads;
  2. if every cost cesc^s_eces​ is continuously differentiable, Φˇ\check\PhiΦˇ is twice continuously differentiable.

Strict convexity is the source of the uniqueness of the equilibrium edge load.

Formalization Note The paper states "twice continuously differentiable" under costs that are only assumed differentiable; that claim needs ces∈C1c^s_e\in C^1ces​∈C1, which is therefore an added hypothesis of the second clause. Strict convexity uses the added full-support assumption: a type profile with zero probability would contribute nothing to Φˇ\check\PhiΦˇ.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_BayesRouting_VOI_Game
import Definitions.Def_BayesRouting_VOI_Potential
Formal statement
namespace BayesRouting.VOI

/-- **Lemma 2** (Wu, Amin, Ozdaglar, Oper. Res. 69(1) 2021, p. 154). The edge-load potential
`Φ̌(w)` (11) is strictly convex, and it is twice continuously differentiable when every cost
`c^s_e` is continuously differentiable (the `C^2` clause needs this added hypothesis: the paper
assumes only differentiable costs). -/
theorem loadPotential_strictConvex {I : Type} [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] {T : I → Type} [∀ i, Fintype (T i)]
    [∀ i, DecidableEq (T i)] [∀ i, Nonempty (T i)] {S E R : Type} [Fintype S] [Fintype E]
    [DecidableEq E] [Fintype R] [Nonempty R]
    (G : Game I T S E R) :
    StrictConvexOn ℝ Set.univ (loadPotential G) ∧
      ((∀ s e, ContDiff ℝ 1 (G.cost s e)) → ContDiff ℝ 2 (loadPotential G)) := by sorry

end BayesRouting.VOI
Source
Wu, Amin, Ozdaglar, Value of Information in Bayesian Routing Games, Oper. Res. 69(1) 2021, p. 154, Lemma 2
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me