Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Case 2.1, OA pp. 26–31 — optimal outcomes for intermediate independent repair costs

Proved
RightRepair.Equilibrium.case_2_1

by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

equilibriump2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1repair-pricingright-to-repair

Suppose (δ+cM)/2≤cI<δ(\delta+c_M)/2\le c_I<\delta(δ+cM​)/2≤cI​<δ. The proof's Case 2.1 gives the no-repair outcome when c≤c‾c\le\underline cc≤c​, the partial-repair outcome when c‾<c<cˉ\underline c<c<\bar cc​<c<cˉ, and the full-repair outcome when cˉ≤c\bar c\le ccˉ≤c. In each regime, the displayed new-product price, repair price, used-product price, and repair probability form an equilibrium that maximizes the manufacturer's profit against every admissible competing equilibrium.

In the partial-repair regime, pn=(c+1+δ(1−f))/2p_n=(c+1+\delta(1-f))/2pn​=(c+1+δ(1−f))/2, pr=pu=(δ+cM)/2p_r=p_u=(\delta+c_M)/2pr​=pu​=(δ+cM​)/2, and 0<α^(pn,pr)<10<\hat\alpha(p_n,p_r)<10<α^(pn​,pr​)<1.

Formalization Note The full-repair price pr=0p_r=0pr​=0 is one point on the source's optimal line. The nonnegative unit-cost pins, zero-price excess-supply corner, and none encoding of pr=∞p_r=\inftypr​=∞ are part of the shared model.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RightRepair_Equilibrium_Setting
Formal statement
namespace RightRepair.Equilibrium

theorem case_2_1 (P : Params) (hP : Standing P)
    (hI : (P.δ + P.cM) / 2 ≤ P.cI ∧ P.cI < P.δ) :
    (P.c ≤ cLow P →
      OptimalOutcome P (pnNo P) none (puNo P) 0) ∧
    (cLow P < P.c → P.c < cBar P →
      OptimalOutcome P (pnNo P) (some ((P.δ + P.cM) / 2))
        ((P.δ + P.cM) / 2)
        (alphaHat P (pnNo P) ((P.δ + P.cM) / 2)) ∧
      0 < alphaHat P (pnNo P) ((P.δ + P.cM) / 2) ∧
      alphaHat P (pnNo P) ((P.δ + P.cM) / 2) < 1) ∧
    (cBar P ≤ P.c →
      OptimalOutcome P (pnFull P) (some 0) (puFull P) 1) := by sorry

end RightRepair.Equilibrium
Source
Jin, Yang & Zhu, Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications, authors' manuscript of Management Science (2022), doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401 (PDF sha256 b869b33a…1763), OA pp. 26–31, Case 2.1 and three conclusions (PDF 59–64)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me