Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

E[ALG]≥(1−(1−1/n)n) OPT∗E[ALG]\ge(1-(1-1/n)^n)\,OPT^*E[ALG]≥(1−(1−1/n)n)OPT∗ for every feasible LP solution

Proved
ComplementFreeCA.XOSRounding.expected_alg_ge_lp_value

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

approximation-algorithmscombinatorial-auctionsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1randomized-roundingxos-valuations

Let n≥1n\ge1n≥1, let every bidder iii have an XOS valuation viv_ivi​ with admissible clause set WiW_iWi​ and XOS oracle cli\mathrm{cl}_icli​, and let win\mathrm{win}win be a highest-clause assignment rule. Let xxx be a feasible solution of the LP relaxation with value OPT∗(x)=∑i,Sxi,Svi(S)\mathrm{OPT}^*(x)=\sum_{i,S}x_{i,S}v_i(S)OPT∗(x)=∑i,S​xi,S​vi​(S). Run the algorithm of §3.2 on the preallocation drawn by randomized rounding from xxx, and let ALG\mathrm{ALG}ALG be the welfare of its allocation. Then

E[ALG] ≥ (1−(1−1n)n) OPT∗(x).\mathbb E[\mathrm{ALG}]\ \ge\ \Big(1-\Big(1-\frac1n\Big)^n\Big)\,\mathrm{OPT}^*(x).E[ALG] ≥ (1−(1−n1​)n)OPT∗(x).

This is the bound the proof of Theorem 3.2 establishes against the fractional value, from which the guarantee against the integral optimum follows.

Formalization Note The statement holds for every feasible xxx, every choice of maximizing clauses and every tie-breaking in step (iii).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_XOSRounding_Model
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_XOSRounding_Rounding
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_XOSRounding_Algorithm
Formal statement
namespace ComplementFreeCA.XOSRounding

theorem expected_alg_ge_lp_value {n m : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
    (W : Fin n → Finset (Fin m → ℝ)) (v : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ)
    (hv : ∀ i, IsXOSWith (v i) (W i))
    (cl : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → Fin m → ℝ) (hcl : ∀ i, IsXOSOracle (v i) (W i) (cl i))
    (win : (Fin n → Finset (Fin m)) → Fin m → Fin n) (hwin : IsHighestClauseRule cl win)
    (x : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ) (hx : IsLPFeasible x) :
    (1 - (1 - 1 / (n : ℝ)) ^ n) * lpValue v x ≤
      roundingExpectation x (algWelfare v win) := by sorry

end ComplementFreeCA.XOSRounding
Source
Dobzinski, Nisan, Schapira, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders, Math. Oper. Res. 35(1), 2010, p. 7, §3.2, proof of Theorem 3.2, display preceding Lemma 3.3
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me